Cargando…
Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients
Terminal kidney patients are faced with lower quality of life, restricted diets and higher morbidity and mortality rates while waiting for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Fortunately, living kidney donation has proven to be a better treatment alternative (e.g. in terms of waiting time and gra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21512856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9326-z |
_version_ | 1782228757655846912 |
---|---|
author | Ismail, Sohal Y. Massey, Emma K. Luchtenburg, Annemarie E. Claassens, Lily Zuidema, Willij C. Busschbach, Jan J. v. Weimar, Willem |
author_facet | Ismail, Sohal Y. Massey, Emma K. Luchtenburg, Annemarie E. Claassens, Lily Zuidema, Willij C. Busschbach, Jan J. v. Weimar, Willem |
author_sort | Ismail, Sohal Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Terminal kidney patients are faced with lower quality of life, restricted diets and higher morbidity and mortality rates while waiting for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Fortunately, living kidney donation has proven to be a better treatment alternative (e.g. in terms of waiting time and graft survival rates). We observed an inequality in the number of living kidney transplantations performed between the non-European and the European patients in our center. Such inequality has been also observed elsewhere in this field and it has been suggested that this inequality relates to, among other things, attitude differences towards donation based on religious beliefs. In this qualitative research we investigated whether religion might indeed (partly) be the explanation of the inequalities in living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) among non-European patients. Fifty patients participated in focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. The interviews were conducted following the focus group method and analyzed in line with Grounded Theory. The qualitative data analyses were performed in Atlas.ti. We found that religion is not perceived as an obstacle to living donation and that religion actually promotes helping and saving the life of a person. Issues such as integrity of the body were not seen as barriers to LDKT. We observed also that there are still uncertainties and a lack of awareness about the position of religion regarding living organ donation within communities, confusion due to varying interpretations of Holy Scriptures and misconceptions regarding the process of donation. Faith leaders play an important educational role and their opinion is influential. This study has identified modifiable factors which may contribute to the ethnic disparity in our living donation program. We argue that we need to strive for more clarity and awareness regarding the stance of religion on the issue of living donation in the local community. Faith leaders could be key figures in increasing awareness and alleviating uncertainty regarding living donation and transplantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3319887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33198872012-04-05 Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients Ismail, Sohal Y. Massey, Emma K. Luchtenburg, Annemarie E. Claassens, Lily Zuidema, Willij C. Busschbach, Jan J. v. Weimar, Willem Med Health Care Philos Scientific Contribution Terminal kidney patients are faced with lower quality of life, restricted diets and higher morbidity and mortality rates while waiting for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Fortunately, living kidney donation has proven to be a better treatment alternative (e.g. in terms of waiting time and graft survival rates). We observed an inequality in the number of living kidney transplantations performed between the non-European and the European patients in our center. Such inequality has been also observed elsewhere in this field and it has been suggested that this inequality relates to, among other things, attitude differences towards donation based on religious beliefs. In this qualitative research we investigated whether religion might indeed (partly) be the explanation of the inequalities in living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) among non-European patients. Fifty patients participated in focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. The interviews were conducted following the focus group method and analyzed in line with Grounded Theory. The qualitative data analyses were performed in Atlas.ti. We found that religion is not perceived as an obstacle to living donation and that religion actually promotes helping and saving the life of a person. Issues such as integrity of the body were not seen as barriers to LDKT. We observed also that there are still uncertainties and a lack of awareness about the position of religion regarding living organ donation within communities, confusion due to varying interpretations of Holy Scriptures and misconceptions regarding the process of donation. Faith leaders play an important educational role and their opinion is influential. This study has identified modifiable factors which may contribute to the ethnic disparity in our living donation program. We argue that we need to strive for more clarity and awareness regarding the stance of religion on the issue of living donation in the local community. Faith leaders could be key figures in increasing awareness and alleviating uncertainty regarding living donation and transplantation. Springer Netherlands 2011-04-22 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3319887/ /pubmed/21512856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9326-z Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Contribution Ismail, Sohal Y. Massey, Emma K. Luchtenburg, Annemarie E. Claassens, Lily Zuidema, Willij C. Busschbach, Jan J. v. Weimar, Willem Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients |
title | Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients |
title_full | Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients |
title_fullStr | Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients |
title_short | Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients |
title_sort | religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among dutch renal patients |
topic | Scientific Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21512856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9326-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ismailsohaly religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients AT masseyemmak religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients AT luchtenburgannemariee religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients AT claassenslily religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients AT zuidemawillijc religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients AT busschbachjanjv religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients AT weimarwillem religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients |