Cargando…

Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients

Terminal kidney patients are faced with lower quality of life, restricted diets and higher morbidity and mortality rates while waiting for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Fortunately, living kidney donation has proven to be a better treatment alternative (e.g. in terms of waiting time and gra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ismail, Sohal Y., Massey, Emma K., Luchtenburg, Annemarie E., Claassens, Lily, Zuidema, Willij C., Busschbach, Jan J. v., Weimar, Willem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21512856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9326-z
_version_ 1782228757655846912
author Ismail, Sohal Y.
Massey, Emma K.
Luchtenburg, Annemarie E.
Claassens, Lily
Zuidema, Willij C.
Busschbach, Jan J. v.
Weimar, Willem
author_facet Ismail, Sohal Y.
Massey, Emma K.
Luchtenburg, Annemarie E.
Claassens, Lily
Zuidema, Willij C.
Busschbach, Jan J. v.
Weimar, Willem
author_sort Ismail, Sohal Y.
collection PubMed
description Terminal kidney patients are faced with lower quality of life, restricted diets and higher morbidity and mortality rates while waiting for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Fortunately, living kidney donation has proven to be a better treatment alternative (e.g. in terms of waiting time and graft survival rates). We observed an inequality in the number of living kidney transplantations performed between the non-European and the European patients in our center. Such inequality has been also observed elsewhere in this field and it has been suggested that this inequality relates to, among other things, attitude differences towards donation based on religious beliefs. In this qualitative research we investigated whether religion might indeed (partly) be the explanation of the inequalities in living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) among non-European patients. Fifty patients participated in focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. The interviews were conducted following the focus group method and analyzed in line with Grounded Theory. The qualitative data analyses were performed in Atlas.ti. We found that religion is not perceived as an obstacle to living donation and that religion actually promotes helping and saving the life of a person. Issues such as integrity of the body were not seen as barriers to LDKT. We observed also that there are still uncertainties and a lack of awareness about the position of religion regarding living organ donation within communities, confusion due to varying interpretations of Holy Scriptures and misconceptions regarding the process of donation. Faith leaders play an important educational role and their opinion is influential. This study has identified modifiable factors which may contribute to the ethnic disparity in our living donation program. We argue that we need to strive for more clarity and awareness regarding the stance of religion on the issue of living donation in the local community. Faith leaders could be key figures in increasing awareness and alleviating uncertainty regarding living donation and transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3319887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33198872012-04-05 Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients Ismail, Sohal Y. Massey, Emma K. Luchtenburg, Annemarie E. Claassens, Lily Zuidema, Willij C. Busschbach, Jan J. v. Weimar, Willem Med Health Care Philos Scientific Contribution Terminal kidney patients are faced with lower quality of life, restricted diets and higher morbidity and mortality rates while waiting for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Fortunately, living kidney donation has proven to be a better treatment alternative (e.g. in terms of waiting time and graft survival rates). We observed an inequality in the number of living kidney transplantations performed between the non-European and the European patients in our center. Such inequality has been also observed elsewhere in this field and it has been suggested that this inequality relates to, among other things, attitude differences towards donation based on religious beliefs. In this qualitative research we investigated whether religion might indeed (partly) be the explanation of the inequalities in living donor kidney transplants (LDKT) among non-European patients. Fifty patients participated in focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. The interviews were conducted following the focus group method and analyzed in line with Grounded Theory. The qualitative data analyses were performed in Atlas.ti. We found that religion is not perceived as an obstacle to living donation and that religion actually promotes helping and saving the life of a person. Issues such as integrity of the body were not seen as barriers to LDKT. We observed also that there are still uncertainties and a lack of awareness about the position of religion regarding living organ donation within communities, confusion due to varying interpretations of Holy Scriptures and misconceptions regarding the process of donation. Faith leaders play an important educational role and their opinion is influential. This study has identified modifiable factors which may contribute to the ethnic disparity in our living donation program. We argue that we need to strive for more clarity and awareness regarding the stance of religion on the issue of living donation in the local community. Faith leaders could be key figures in increasing awareness and alleviating uncertainty regarding living donation and transplantation. Springer Netherlands 2011-04-22 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3319887/ /pubmed/21512856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9326-z Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Scientific Contribution
Ismail, Sohal Y.
Massey, Emma K.
Luchtenburg, Annemarie E.
Claassens, Lily
Zuidema, Willij C.
Busschbach, Jan J. v.
Weimar, Willem
Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients
title Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients
title_full Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients
title_fullStr Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients
title_full_unstemmed Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients
title_short Religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among Dutch renal patients
title_sort religious attitudes towards living kidney donation among dutch renal patients
topic Scientific Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21512856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9326-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ismailsohaly religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients
AT masseyemmak religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients
AT luchtenburgannemariee religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients
AT claassenslily religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients
AT zuidemawillijc religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients
AT busschbachjanjv religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients
AT weimarwillem religiousattitudestowardslivingkidneydonationamongdutchrenalpatients