Cargando…

Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) for breast masses. METHODS: For intraobserver reproducibility, each observer obtained three consecutive SWE images of 758 masses that were visible on ultrasound. 144 (19%) were malignant. Weighted kappa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cosgrove, David O., Berg, Wendie A., Doré, Caroline J, Skyba, Danny M., Henry, Jean-Pierre, Gay, Joel, Cohen-Bacrie, Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3321140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22210408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2340-y
_version_ 1782228914684297216
author Cosgrove, David O.
Berg, Wendie A.
Doré, Caroline J
Skyba, Danny M.
Henry, Jean-Pierre
Gay, Joel
Cohen-Bacrie, Claude
author_facet Cosgrove, David O.
Berg, Wendie A.
Doré, Caroline J
Skyba, Danny M.
Henry, Jean-Pierre
Gay, Joel
Cohen-Bacrie, Claude
author_sort Cosgrove, David O.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) for breast masses. METHODS: For intraobserver reproducibility, each observer obtained three consecutive SWE images of 758 masses that were visible on ultrasound. 144 (19%) were malignant. Weighted kappa was used to assess the agreement of qualitative elastographic features; the reliability of quantitative measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). For the interobserver reproducibility, a blinded observer reviewed images and agreement on features was determined. RESULTS: Mean age was 50 years; mean mass size was 13 mm. Qualitatively, SWE images were at least reasonably similar for 666/758 (87.9%). Intraclass correlation for SWE diameter, area and perimeter was almost perfect (ICC ≥ 0.94). Intraobserver reliability for maximum and mean elasticity was almost perfect (ICC = 0.84 and 0.87) and was substantial for the ratio of mass-to-fat elasticity (ICC = 0.77). Interobserver agreement was moderate for SWE homogeneity (κ = 0.57), substantial for qualitative colour assessment of maximum elasticity (κ = 0.66), fair for SWE shape (κ = 0.40), fair for B-mode mass margins (κ = 0.38), and moderate for B-mode mass shape (κ = 0.58), orientation (κ = 0.53) and BI-RADS assessment (κ = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: SWE is highly reproducible for assessing elastographic features of breast masses within and across observers. SWE interpretation is at least as consistent as that of BI-RADS ultrasound B-mode features. KEY POINTS: • Shear wave ultrasound elastography can measure the stiffness of breast tissue • It provides a qualitatively and quantitatively interpretable colour-coded map of tissue stiffness • Intraobserver reproducibility of SWE is almost perfect while intraobserver reproducibility of SWE proved to be moderate to substantial • The most reproducible SWE features between observers were SWE image homogeneity and maximum elasticity
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3321140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33211402012-04-20 Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible Cosgrove, David O. Berg, Wendie A. Doré, Caroline J Skyba, Danny M. Henry, Jean-Pierre Gay, Joel Cohen-Bacrie, Claude Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVES: To evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) for breast masses. METHODS: For intraobserver reproducibility, each observer obtained three consecutive SWE images of 758 masses that were visible on ultrasound. 144 (19%) were malignant. Weighted kappa was used to assess the agreement of qualitative elastographic features; the reliability of quantitative measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). For the interobserver reproducibility, a blinded observer reviewed images and agreement on features was determined. RESULTS: Mean age was 50 years; mean mass size was 13 mm. Qualitatively, SWE images were at least reasonably similar for 666/758 (87.9%). Intraclass correlation for SWE diameter, area and perimeter was almost perfect (ICC ≥ 0.94). Intraobserver reliability for maximum and mean elasticity was almost perfect (ICC = 0.84 and 0.87) and was substantial for the ratio of mass-to-fat elasticity (ICC = 0.77). Interobserver agreement was moderate for SWE homogeneity (κ = 0.57), substantial for qualitative colour assessment of maximum elasticity (κ = 0.66), fair for SWE shape (κ = 0.40), fair for B-mode mass margins (κ = 0.38), and moderate for B-mode mass shape (κ = 0.58), orientation (κ = 0.53) and BI-RADS assessment (κ = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: SWE is highly reproducible for assessing elastographic features of breast masses within and across observers. SWE interpretation is at least as consistent as that of BI-RADS ultrasound B-mode features. KEY POINTS: • Shear wave ultrasound elastography can measure the stiffness of breast tissue • It provides a qualitatively and quantitatively interpretable colour-coded map of tissue stiffness • Intraobserver reproducibility of SWE is almost perfect while intraobserver reproducibility of SWE proved to be moderate to substantial • The most reproducible SWE features between observers were SWE image homogeneity and maximum elasticity Springer-Verlag 2011-12-31 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3321140/ /pubmed/22210408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2340-y Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Breast
Cosgrove, David O.
Berg, Wendie A.
Doré, Caroline J
Skyba, Danny M.
Henry, Jean-Pierre
Gay, Joel
Cohen-Bacrie, Claude
Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible
title Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible
title_full Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible
title_fullStr Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible
title_full_unstemmed Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible
title_short Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible
title_sort shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3321140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22210408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2340-y
work_keys_str_mv AT cosgrovedavido shearwaveelastographyforbreastmassesishighlyreproducible
AT bergwendiea shearwaveelastographyforbreastmassesishighlyreproducible
AT dorecarolinej shearwaveelastographyforbreastmassesishighlyreproducible
AT skybadannym shearwaveelastographyforbreastmassesishighlyreproducible
AT henryjeanpierre shearwaveelastographyforbreastmassesishighlyreproducible
AT gayjoel shearwaveelastographyforbreastmassesishighlyreproducible
AT cohenbacrieclaude shearwaveelastographyforbreastmassesishighlyreproducible
AT shearwaveelastographyforbreastmassesishighlyreproducible