Cargando…
Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest in Academic Grant Evaluation: A Qualitative Study of Multiple Stakeholders in France
BACKGROUND: Peer review is the most widely used method for evaluating grant applications in clinical research. Criticisms of peer review include lack of equity, suspicion of biases, and conflicts of interest (CoI). CoIs raise questions of fairness, transparency, and trust in grant allocation. Few ob...
Autores principales: | Abdoul, Hendy, Perrey, Christophe, Tubach, Florence, Amiel, Philippe, Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle, Alberti, Corinne |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22496913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035247 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices
por: Abdoul, Hendy, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
How to Improve the Implementation of Academic Clinical Pediatric Trials Involving Drug Therapy? A Qualitative Study of Multiple Stakeholders
por: Girard, Delphine, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Toward improvement of knowledge of financial conflicts of interest in a large medical school in France
por: Alexandra, J. F., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Institutional financial conflicts of interest policies at Canadian academic health science centres: a national survey
por: Rochon, Paula A, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Conflicts of interest and the future of medicine: the US, France, and Japan
por: Kostera, Thomas
Publicado: (2012)