Cargando…

Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall

Many models of memory build in a term for encoding variability, the observation that there can be variability in the richness or extensiveness of processing at encoding, and that this variability has consequences for retrieval. In four experiments, we tested the expectation that encoding variability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hargreaves, Ian S., Pexman, Penny M., Johnson, Jeremy C., Zdrazilova, Lenka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22514526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00073
_version_ 1782229069116473344
author Hargreaves, Ian S.
Pexman, Penny M.
Johnson, Jeremy C.
Zdrazilova, Lenka
author_facet Hargreaves, Ian S.
Pexman, Penny M.
Johnson, Jeremy C.
Zdrazilova, Lenka
author_sort Hargreaves, Ian S.
collection PubMed
description Many models of memory build in a term for encoding variability, the observation that there can be variability in the richness or extensiveness of processing at encoding, and that this variability has consequences for retrieval. In four experiments, we tested the expectation that encoding variability could be driven by the properties of the to-be-remembered item. Specifically, that concepts associated with more semantic features would be better remembered than concepts associated with fewer semantic features. Using feature listing norms we selected sets of items for which people tend to list higher numbers of features (high NoF) and items for which people tend to list lower numbers of features (low NoF). Results showed more accurate free recall for high NoF concepts than for low NoF concepts in expected memory tasks (Experiments 1–3) and also in an unexpected memory task (Experiment 4). This effect was not the result of associative chaining between study items (Experiment 3), and can be attributed to the amount of item-specific processing that occurs at study (Experiment 4). These results provide evidence that stimulus-specific differences in processing at encoding have consequences for explicit memory retrieval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3322485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33224852012-04-18 Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall Hargreaves, Ian S. Pexman, Penny M. Johnson, Jeremy C. Zdrazilova, Lenka Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Many models of memory build in a term for encoding variability, the observation that there can be variability in the richness or extensiveness of processing at encoding, and that this variability has consequences for retrieval. In four experiments, we tested the expectation that encoding variability could be driven by the properties of the to-be-remembered item. Specifically, that concepts associated with more semantic features would be better remembered than concepts associated with fewer semantic features. Using feature listing norms we selected sets of items for which people tend to list higher numbers of features (high NoF) and items for which people tend to list lower numbers of features (low NoF). Results showed more accurate free recall for high NoF concepts than for low NoF concepts in expected memory tasks (Experiments 1–3) and also in an unexpected memory task (Experiment 4). This effect was not the result of associative chaining between study items (Experiment 3), and can be attributed to the amount of item-specific processing that occurs at study (Experiment 4). These results provide evidence that stimulus-specific differences in processing at encoding have consequences for explicit memory retrieval. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3322485/ /pubmed/22514526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00073 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hargreaves, Pexman, Johnson and Zdrazilova. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hargreaves, Ian S.
Pexman, Penny M.
Johnson, Jeremy C.
Zdrazilova, Lenka
Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall
title Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall
title_full Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall
title_fullStr Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall
title_full_unstemmed Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall
title_short Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall
title_sort richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22514526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00073
work_keys_str_mv AT hargreavesians richerconceptsarebetterrememberednumberoffeatureseffectsinfreerecall
AT pexmanpennym richerconceptsarebetterrememberednumberoffeatureseffectsinfreerecall
AT johnsonjeremyc richerconceptsarebetterrememberednumberoffeatureseffectsinfreerecall
AT zdrazilovalenka richerconceptsarebetterrememberednumberoffeatureseffectsinfreerecall