Cargando…
Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response
We evaluated the usefulness of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism response. We performed a systematic review by searching relevant databases (e.g., MEDLINE) and Web sites for reports of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems that could be us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15078604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1001.030243 |
_version_ | 1782229098215505920 |
---|---|
author | Bravata, Dena M. Sundaram, Vandana McDonald, Kathryn M. Smith, Wendy M. Szeto, Herbert Schleinitz, Mark D. Owens, Douglas K. |
author_facet | Bravata, Dena M. Sundaram, Vandana McDonald, Kathryn M. Smith, Wendy M. Szeto, Herbert Schleinitz, Mark D. Owens, Douglas K. |
author_sort | Bravata, Dena M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluated the usefulness of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism response. We performed a systematic review by searching relevant databases (e.g., MEDLINE) and Web sites for reports of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems that could be used during bioterrorism responses. We reviewed over 24,000 citations and identified 55 detection systems and 23 diagnostic decision support systems. Only 35 systems have been evaluated: 4 reported both sensitivity and specificity, 13 were compared to a reference standard, and 31 were evaluated for their timeliness. Most evaluations of detection systems and some evaluations of diagnostic systems for bioterrorism responses are critically deficient. Because false-positive and false-negative rates are unknown for most systems, decision making on the basis of these systems is seriously compromised. We describe a framework for the design of future evaluations of such systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3322751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33227512012-04-16 Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response Bravata, Dena M. Sundaram, Vandana McDonald, Kathryn M. Smith, Wendy M. Szeto, Herbert Schleinitz, Mark D. Owens, Douglas K. Emerg Infect Dis Research We evaluated the usefulness of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism response. We performed a systematic review by searching relevant databases (e.g., MEDLINE) and Web sites for reports of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems that could be used during bioterrorism responses. We reviewed over 24,000 citations and identified 55 detection systems and 23 diagnostic decision support systems. Only 35 systems have been evaluated: 4 reported both sensitivity and specificity, 13 were compared to a reference standard, and 31 were evaluated for their timeliness. Most evaluations of detection systems and some evaluations of diagnostic systems for bioterrorism responses are critically deficient. Because false-positive and false-negative rates are unknown for most systems, decision making on the basis of these systems is seriously compromised. We describe a framework for the design of future evaluations of such systems. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2004-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3322751/ /pubmed/15078604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1001.030243 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Bravata, Dena M. Sundaram, Vandana McDonald, Kathryn M. Smith, Wendy M. Szeto, Herbert Schleinitz, Mark D. Owens, Douglas K. Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response |
title | Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response |
title_full | Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response |
title_short | Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response |
title_sort | evaluating detection and diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism response |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15078604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1001.030243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bravatadenam evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse AT sundaramvandana evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse AT mcdonaldkathrynm evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse AT smithwendym evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse AT szetoherbert evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse AT schleinitzmarkd evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse AT owensdouglask evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse |