Cargando…

Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response

We evaluated the usefulness of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism response. We performed a systematic review by searching relevant databases (e.g., MEDLINE) and Web sites for reports of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems that could be us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bravata, Dena M., Sundaram, Vandana, McDonald, Kathryn M., Smith, Wendy M., Szeto, Herbert, Schleinitz, Mark D., Owens, Douglas K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15078604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1001.030243
_version_ 1782229098215505920
author Bravata, Dena M.
Sundaram, Vandana
McDonald, Kathryn M.
Smith, Wendy M.
Szeto, Herbert
Schleinitz, Mark D.
Owens, Douglas K.
author_facet Bravata, Dena M.
Sundaram, Vandana
McDonald, Kathryn M.
Smith, Wendy M.
Szeto, Herbert
Schleinitz, Mark D.
Owens, Douglas K.
author_sort Bravata, Dena M.
collection PubMed
description We evaluated the usefulness of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism response. We performed a systematic review by searching relevant databases (e.g., MEDLINE) and Web sites for reports of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems that could be used during bioterrorism responses. We reviewed over 24,000 citations and identified 55 detection systems and 23 diagnostic decision support systems. Only 35 systems have been evaluated: 4 reported both sensitivity and specificity, 13 were compared to a reference standard, and 31 were evaluated for their timeliness. Most evaluations of detection systems and some evaluations of diagnostic systems for bioterrorism responses are critically deficient. Because false-positive and false-negative rates are unknown for most systems, decision making on the basis of these systems is seriously compromised. We describe a framework for the design of future evaluations of such systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3322751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33227512012-04-16 Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response Bravata, Dena M. Sundaram, Vandana McDonald, Kathryn M. Smith, Wendy M. Szeto, Herbert Schleinitz, Mark D. Owens, Douglas K. Emerg Infect Dis Research We evaluated the usefulness of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism response. We performed a systematic review by searching relevant databases (e.g., MEDLINE) and Web sites for reports of detection systems and diagnostic decision support systems that could be used during bioterrorism responses. We reviewed over 24,000 citations and identified 55 detection systems and 23 diagnostic decision support systems. Only 35 systems have been evaluated: 4 reported both sensitivity and specificity, 13 were compared to a reference standard, and 31 were evaluated for their timeliness. Most evaluations of detection systems and some evaluations of diagnostic systems for bioterrorism responses are critically deficient. Because false-positive and false-negative rates are unknown for most systems, decision making on the basis of these systems is seriously compromised. We describe a framework for the design of future evaluations of such systems. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2004-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3322751/ /pubmed/15078604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1001.030243 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bravata, Dena M.
Sundaram, Vandana
McDonald, Kathryn M.
Smith, Wendy M.
Szeto, Herbert
Schleinitz, Mark D.
Owens, Douglas K.
Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response
title Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response
title_full Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response
title_fullStr Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response
title_short Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response
title_sort evaluating detection and diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism response
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3322751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15078604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1001.030243
work_keys_str_mv AT bravatadenam evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse
AT sundaramvandana evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse
AT mcdonaldkathrynm evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse
AT smithwendym evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse
AT szetoherbert evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse
AT schleinitzmarkd evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse
AT owensdouglask evaluatingdetectionanddiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemsforbioterrorismresponse