Cargando…

Using Grizzly Bears to Assess Harvest-Ecosystem Tradeoffs in Salmon Fisheries

Implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) requires a clear conceptual and quantitative framework for assessing how different harvest options can modify benefits to ecosystem and human beneficiaries. We address this social-ecological need for Pacific salmon fisheries, which are ec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levi, Taal, Darimont, Chris T., MacDuffee, Misty, Mangel, Marc, Paquet, Paul, Wilmers, Christopher C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3323506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001303
_version_ 1782229213485465600
author Levi, Taal
Darimont, Chris T.
MacDuffee, Misty
Mangel, Marc
Paquet, Paul
Wilmers, Christopher C.
author_facet Levi, Taal
Darimont, Chris T.
MacDuffee, Misty
Mangel, Marc
Paquet, Paul
Wilmers, Christopher C.
author_sort Levi, Taal
collection PubMed
description Implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) requires a clear conceptual and quantitative framework for assessing how different harvest options can modify benefits to ecosystem and human beneficiaries. We address this social-ecological need for Pacific salmon fisheries, which are economically valuable but intercept much of the annual pulse of nutrient subsidies that salmon provide to terrestrial and aquatic food webs. We used grizzly bears, vectors of salmon nutrients and animals with densities strongly coupled to salmon abundance, as surrogates for “salmon ecosystem” function. Combining salmon biomass and stock-recruitment data with stable isotope analysis, we assess potential tradeoffs between fishery yields and bear population densities for six sockeye salmon stocks in Bristol Bay, Alaska, and British Columbia (BC), Canada. For the coastal stocks, we find that both bear densities and fishery yields would increase substantially if ecosystem allocations of salmon increase from currently applied lower to upper goals and beyond. This aligning of benefits comes at a potential cost, however, with the possibility of forgoing harvests in low productivity years. In contrast, we detect acute tradeoffs between bear densities and fishery yields in interior stocks within the Fraser River, BC, where biomass from other salmon species is low. There, increasing salmon allocations to ecosystems would benefit threatened bear populations at the cost of reduced long-term yields. To resolve this conflict, we propose an EBFM goal that values fisheries and bears (and by extension, the ecosystem) equally. At such targets, ecosystem benefits are unexpectedly large compared with losses in fishery yields. To explore other management options, we generate tradeoff curves that provide stock-specific accounting of the expected loss to fishers and gain to bears as more salmon escape the fishery. Our approach, modified to suit multiple scenarios, provides a generalizable method to resolve conflicts over shared resources in other systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3323506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33235062012-04-13 Using Grizzly Bears to Assess Harvest-Ecosystem Tradeoffs in Salmon Fisheries Levi, Taal Darimont, Chris T. MacDuffee, Misty Mangel, Marc Paquet, Paul Wilmers, Christopher C. PLoS Biol Research Article Implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) requires a clear conceptual and quantitative framework for assessing how different harvest options can modify benefits to ecosystem and human beneficiaries. We address this social-ecological need for Pacific salmon fisheries, which are economically valuable but intercept much of the annual pulse of nutrient subsidies that salmon provide to terrestrial and aquatic food webs. We used grizzly bears, vectors of salmon nutrients and animals with densities strongly coupled to salmon abundance, as surrogates for “salmon ecosystem” function. Combining salmon biomass and stock-recruitment data with stable isotope analysis, we assess potential tradeoffs between fishery yields and bear population densities for six sockeye salmon stocks in Bristol Bay, Alaska, and British Columbia (BC), Canada. For the coastal stocks, we find that both bear densities and fishery yields would increase substantially if ecosystem allocations of salmon increase from currently applied lower to upper goals and beyond. This aligning of benefits comes at a potential cost, however, with the possibility of forgoing harvests in low productivity years. In contrast, we detect acute tradeoffs between bear densities and fishery yields in interior stocks within the Fraser River, BC, where biomass from other salmon species is low. There, increasing salmon allocations to ecosystems would benefit threatened bear populations at the cost of reduced long-term yields. To resolve this conflict, we propose an EBFM goal that values fisheries and bears (and by extension, the ecosystem) equally. At such targets, ecosystem benefits are unexpectedly large compared with losses in fishery yields. To explore other management options, we generate tradeoff curves that provide stock-specific accounting of the expected loss to fishers and gain to bears as more salmon escape the fishery. Our approach, modified to suit multiple scenarios, provides a generalizable method to resolve conflicts over shared resources in other systems. Public Library of Science 2012-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3323506/ /pubmed/22505845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001303 Text en Levi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Levi, Taal
Darimont, Chris T.
MacDuffee, Misty
Mangel, Marc
Paquet, Paul
Wilmers, Christopher C.
Using Grizzly Bears to Assess Harvest-Ecosystem Tradeoffs in Salmon Fisheries
title Using Grizzly Bears to Assess Harvest-Ecosystem Tradeoffs in Salmon Fisheries
title_full Using Grizzly Bears to Assess Harvest-Ecosystem Tradeoffs in Salmon Fisheries
title_fullStr Using Grizzly Bears to Assess Harvest-Ecosystem Tradeoffs in Salmon Fisheries
title_full_unstemmed Using Grizzly Bears to Assess Harvest-Ecosystem Tradeoffs in Salmon Fisheries
title_short Using Grizzly Bears to Assess Harvest-Ecosystem Tradeoffs in Salmon Fisheries
title_sort using grizzly bears to assess harvest-ecosystem tradeoffs in salmon fisheries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3323506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22505845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001303
work_keys_str_mv AT levitaal usinggrizzlybearstoassessharvestecosystemtradeoffsinsalmonfisheries
AT darimontchrist usinggrizzlybearstoassessharvestecosystemtradeoffsinsalmonfisheries
AT macduffeemisty usinggrizzlybearstoassessharvestecosystemtradeoffsinsalmonfisheries
AT mangelmarc usinggrizzlybearstoassessharvestecosystemtradeoffsinsalmonfisheries
AT paquetpaul usinggrizzlybearstoassessharvestecosystemtradeoffsinsalmonfisheries
AT wilmerschristopherc usinggrizzlybearstoassessharvestecosystemtradeoffsinsalmonfisheries