Cargando…

Have the public's expectations for antibiotics for acute uncomplicated respiratory tract infections changed since the H1N1 influenza pandemic? A qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the H1N1 influenza pandemic on the public's expectations for a general practice consultation and antibiotic for acute respiratory illness. DESIGN: Mixed methods. PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative interviews: 17 participants with acute respiratory tract infection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNulty, Cliodna, Joshi, Puja, Butler, Chris C, Atkinson, Lou, Nichols, Tom, Hogan, Angela, French, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3323811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000674
_version_ 1782229255038435328
author McNulty, Cliodna
Joshi, Puja
Butler, Chris C
Atkinson, Lou
Nichols, Tom
Hogan, Angela
French, David
author_facet McNulty, Cliodna
Joshi, Puja
Butler, Chris C
Atkinson, Lou
Nichols, Tom
Hogan, Angela
French, David
author_sort McNulty, Cliodna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the H1N1 influenza pandemic on the public's expectations for a general practice consultation and antibiotic for acute respiratory illness. DESIGN: Mixed methods. PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative interviews: 17 participants with acute respiratory tract infection (RTI) visiting English pharmacies. Face-to-face survey: about 1700 adults aged 15 years and older were recruited from households in England in January 2008, 2009 and 2011. RESULTS: The qualitative data indicated that the general public had either forgotten about the ‘swine flu’ (H1N1 influenza) pandemic or it did not concern them as it had not affected them directly or affected their management of their current RTI illness. Between 2009 and 2011, we found that there was little or no change in people's expectations for antibiotics for runny nose, colds, sore throat or cough, but people's expectations for antibiotics for flu increased (26%–32%, p=0.004). Of the 1000 respondents in 2011 with an RTI in the previous 6 months, 13% reported that they took care of themselves without contacting their general practitioners and would not have done so before the pandemic, 9% reported that they had contacted their doctor's surgery and would not have done so before the pandemic and 0.6% stated that they had asked for antibiotics and would not have done so before the pandemic. In 2011, of 123 respondents with a young child (0–4 years) having an RTI in the previous 6 months, 7.4% requested antibiotics and would not have done so before the pandemic. Unprompted, 20% of respondents thought Tamiflu© (oseltamivir) was a vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Expectations of the general public for a consultation or antibiotics with an RTI are similar now to before the H1N1 influenza pandemic; therefore, public antibiotic campaign messages and general practice advice to patients can remain unchanged. Parents with young children and those with personal experience of the H1N1 influenza are more likely to consult and will need more reassurance. The public need more education about Tamiflu©.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3323811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33238112012-04-18 Have the public's expectations for antibiotics for acute uncomplicated respiratory tract infections changed since the H1N1 influenza pandemic? A qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire study McNulty, Cliodna Joshi, Puja Butler, Chris C Atkinson, Lou Nichols, Tom Hogan, Angela French, David BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the H1N1 influenza pandemic on the public's expectations for a general practice consultation and antibiotic for acute respiratory illness. DESIGN: Mixed methods. PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative interviews: 17 participants with acute respiratory tract infection (RTI) visiting English pharmacies. Face-to-face survey: about 1700 adults aged 15 years and older were recruited from households in England in January 2008, 2009 and 2011. RESULTS: The qualitative data indicated that the general public had either forgotten about the ‘swine flu’ (H1N1 influenza) pandemic or it did not concern them as it had not affected them directly or affected their management of their current RTI illness. Between 2009 and 2011, we found that there was little or no change in people's expectations for antibiotics for runny nose, colds, sore throat or cough, but people's expectations for antibiotics for flu increased (26%–32%, p=0.004). Of the 1000 respondents in 2011 with an RTI in the previous 6 months, 13% reported that they took care of themselves without contacting their general practitioners and would not have done so before the pandemic, 9% reported that they had contacted their doctor's surgery and would not have done so before the pandemic and 0.6% stated that they had asked for antibiotics and would not have done so before the pandemic. In 2011, of 123 respondents with a young child (0–4 years) having an RTI in the previous 6 months, 7.4% requested antibiotics and would not have done so before the pandemic. Unprompted, 20% of respondents thought Tamiflu© (oseltamivir) was a vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Expectations of the general public for a consultation or antibiotics with an RTI are similar now to before the H1N1 influenza pandemic; therefore, public antibiotic campaign messages and general practice advice to patients can remain unchanged. Parents with young children and those with personal experience of the H1N1 influenza are more likely to consult and will need more reassurance. The public need more education about Tamiflu©. BMJ Group 2012-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3323811/ /pubmed/22457479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000674 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Public Health
McNulty, Cliodna
Joshi, Puja
Butler, Chris C
Atkinson, Lou
Nichols, Tom
Hogan, Angela
French, David
Have the public's expectations for antibiotics for acute uncomplicated respiratory tract infections changed since the H1N1 influenza pandemic? A qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire study
title Have the public's expectations for antibiotics for acute uncomplicated respiratory tract infections changed since the H1N1 influenza pandemic? A qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire study
title_full Have the public's expectations for antibiotics for acute uncomplicated respiratory tract infections changed since the H1N1 influenza pandemic? A qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire study
title_fullStr Have the public's expectations for antibiotics for acute uncomplicated respiratory tract infections changed since the H1N1 influenza pandemic? A qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire study
title_full_unstemmed Have the public's expectations for antibiotics for acute uncomplicated respiratory tract infections changed since the H1N1 influenza pandemic? A qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire study
title_short Have the public's expectations for antibiotics for acute uncomplicated respiratory tract infections changed since the H1N1 influenza pandemic? A qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire study
title_sort have the public's expectations for antibiotics for acute uncomplicated respiratory tract infections changed since the h1n1 influenza pandemic? a qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3323811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000674
work_keys_str_mv AT mcnultycliodna havethepublicsexpectationsforantibioticsforacuteuncomplicatedrespiratorytractinfectionschangedsincetheh1n1influenzapandemicaqualitativeinterviewandquantitativequestionnairestudy
AT joshipuja havethepublicsexpectationsforantibioticsforacuteuncomplicatedrespiratorytractinfectionschangedsincetheh1n1influenzapandemicaqualitativeinterviewandquantitativequestionnairestudy
AT butlerchrisc havethepublicsexpectationsforantibioticsforacuteuncomplicatedrespiratorytractinfectionschangedsincetheh1n1influenzapandemicaqualitativeinterviewandquantitativequestionnairestudy
AT atkinsonlou havethepublicsexpectationsforantibioticsforacuteuncomplicatedrespiratorytractinfectionschangedsincetheh1n1influenzapandemicaqualitativeinterviewandquantitativequestionnairestudy
AT nicholstom havethepublicsexpectationsforantibioticsforacuteuncomplicatedrespiratorytractinfectionschangedsincetheh1n1influenzapandemicaqualitativeinterviewandquantitativequestionnairestudy
AT hoganangela havethepublicsexpectationsforantibioticsforacuteuncomplicatedrespiratorytractinfectionschangedsincetheh1n1influenzapandemicaqualitativeinterviewandquantitativequestionnairestudy
AT frenchdavid havethepublicsexpectationsforantibioticsforacuteuncomplicatedrespiratorytractinfectionschangedsincetheh1n1influenzapandemicaqualitativeinterviewandquantitativequestionnairestudy