Cargando…

Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing

Mental imagery is considered to be important for normal conscious experience. It is most frequently investigated in the visual, auditory and motor domain (imagination of movement), while the studies on tactile imagery (imagination of touch) are scarce. The current study investigated the effect of ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anema, Helen A., de Haan, Alyanne M., Gebuis, Titia, Dijkerman, H. Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3324683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22354100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3020-0
_version_ 1782229337539346432
author Anema, Helen A.
de Haan, Alyanne M.
Gebuis, Titia
Dijkerman, H. Chris
author_facet Anema, Helen A.
de Haan, Alyanne M.
Gebuis, Titia
Dijkerman, H. Chris
author_sort Anema, Helen A.
collection PubMed
description Mental imagery is considered to be important for normal conscious experience. It is most frequently investigated in the visual, auditory and motor domain (imagination of movement), while the studies on tactile imagery (imagination of touch) are scarce. The current study investigated the effect of tactile and auditory imagery on the left/right discriminations of tactile and auditory stimuli. In line with our hypothesis, we observed that after tactile imagery, tactile stimuli were responded to faster as compared to auditory stimuli and vice versa. On average, tactile stimuli were responded to faster as compared to auditory stimuli, and stimuli in the imagery condition were on average responded to slower as compared to baseline performance (left/right discrimination without imagery assignment). The former is probably due to the spatial and somatotopic proximity of the fingers receiving the taps and the thumbs performing the response (button press), the latter to a dual task cost. Together, these results provide the first evidence of a behavioural effect of a tactile imagery assignment on the perception of real tactile stimuli. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3020-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3324683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33246832012-04-20 Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing Anema, Helen A. de Haan, Alyanne M. Gebuis, Titia Dijkerman, H. Chris Exp Brain Res Research Article Mental imagery is considered to be important for normal conscious experience. It is most frequently investigated in the visual, auditory and motor domain (imagination of movement), while the studies on tactile imagery (imagination of touch) are scarce. The current study investigated the effect of tactile and auditory imagery on the left/right discriminations of tactile and auditory stimuli. In line with our hypothesis, we observed that after tactile imagery, tactile stimuli were responded to faster as compared to auditory stimuli and vice versa. On average, tactile stimuli were responded to faster as compared to auditory stimuli, and stimuli in the imagery condition were on average responded to slower as compared to baseline performance (left/right discrimination without imagery assignment). The former is probably due to the spatial and somatotopic proximity of the fingers receiving the taps and the thumbs performing the response (button press), the latter to a dual task cost. Together, these results provide the first evidence of a behavioural effect of a tactile imagery assignment on the perception of real tactile stimuli. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3020-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2012-02-22 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3324683/ /pubmed/22354100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3020-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Anema, Helen A.
de Haan, Alyanne M.
Gebuis, Titia
Dijkerman, H. Chris
Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing
title Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing
title_full Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing
title_fullStr Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing
title_full_unstemmed Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing
title_short Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing
title_sort thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3324683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22354100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3020-0
work_keys_str_mv AT anemahelena thinkingabouttouchfacilitatestactilebutnotauditoryprocessing
AT dehaanalyannem thinkingabouttouchfacilitatestactilebutnotauditoryprocessing
AT gebuistitia thinkingabouttouchfacilitatestactilebutnotauditoryprocessing
AT dijkermanhchris thinkingabouttouchfacilitatestactilebutnotauditoryprocessing