Cargando…
Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing
Mental imagery is considered to be important for normal conscious experience. It is most frequently investigated in the visual, auditory and motor domain (imagination of movement), while the studies on tactile imagery (imagination of touch) are scarce. The current study investigated the effect of ta...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3324683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22354100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3020-0 |
_version_ | 1782229337539346432 |
---|---|
author | Anema, Helen A. de Haan, Alyanne M. Gebuis, Titia Dijkerman, H. Chris |
author_facet | Anema, Helen A. de Haan, Alyanne M. Gebuis, Titia Dijkerman, H. Chris |
author_sort | Anema, Helen A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mental imagery is considered to be important for normal conscious experience. It is most frequently investigated in the visual, auditory and motor domain (imagination of movement), while the studies on tactile imagery (imagination of touch) are scarce. The current study investigated the effect of tactile and auditory imagery on the left/right discriminations of tactile and auditory stimuli. In line with our hypothesis, we observed that after tactile imagery, tactile stimuli were responded to faster as compared to auditory stimuli and vice versa. On average, tactile stimuli were responded to faster as compared to auditory stimuli, and stimuli in the imagery condition were on average responded to slower as compared to baseline performance (left/right discrimination without imagery assignment). The former is probably due to the spatial and somatotopic proximity of the fingers receiving the taps and the thumbs performing the response (button press), the latter to a dual task cost. Together, these results provide the first evidence of a behavioural effect of a tactile imagery assignment on the perception of real tactile stimuli. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3020-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3324683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33246832012-04-20 Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing Anema, Helen A. de Haan, Alyanne M. Gebuis, Titia Dijkerman, H. Chris Exp Brain Res Research Article Mental imagery is considered to be important for normal conscious experience. It is most frequently investigated in the visual, auditory and motor domain (imagination of movement), while the studies on tactile imagery (imagination of touch) are scarce. The current study investigated the effect of tactile and auditory imagery on the left/right discriminations of tactile and auditory stimuli. In line with our hypothesis, we observed that after tactile imagery, tactile stimuli were responded to faster as compared to auditory stimuli and vice versa. On average, tactile stimuli were responded to faster as compared to auditory stimuli, and stimuli in the imagery condition were on average responded to slower as compared to baseline performance (left/right discrimination without imagery assignment). The former is probably due to the spatial and somatotopic proximity of the fingers receiving the taps and the thumbs performing the response (button press), the latter to a dual task cost. Together, these results provide the first evidence of a behavioural effect of a tactile imagery assignment on the perception of real tactile stimuli. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3020-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2012-02-22 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3324683/ /pubmed/22354100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3020-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Anema, Helen A. de Haan, Alyanne M. Gebuis, Titia Dijkerman, H. Chris Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing |
title | Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing |
title_full | Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing |
title_fullStr | Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing |
title_short | Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing |
title_sort | thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3324683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22354100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3020-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anemahelena thinkingabouttouchfacilitatestactilebutnotauditoryprocessing AT dehaanalyannem thinkingabouttouchfacilitatestactilebutnotauditoryprocessing AT gebuistitia thinkingabouttouchfacilitatestactilebutnotauditoryprocessing AT dijkermanhchris thinkingabouttouchfacilitatestactilebutnotauditoryprocessing |