Cargando…

Comparative Transcriptional Network Modeling of Three PPAR-α/γ Co-Agonists Reveals Distinct Metabolic Gene Signatures in Primary Human Hepatocytes

AIMS: To compare the molecular and biologic signatures of a balanced dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α/γ agonist, aleglitazar, with tesaglitazar (a dual PPAR-α/γ agonist) or a combination of pioglitazone (Pio; PPAR-γ agonist) and fenofibrate (Feno; PPAR-α agonist) in human hep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deehan, Renée, Maerz-Weiss, Pia, Catlett, Natalie L., Steiner, Guido, Wong, Ben, Wright, Matthew B., Blander, Gil, Elliston, Keith O., Ladd, William, Bobadilla, Maria, Mizrahi, Jacques, Haefliger, Carolina, Edgar, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3325914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22514701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035012
_version_ 1782229467176894464
author Deehan, Renée
Maerz-Weiss, Pia
Catlett, Natalie L.
Steiner, Guido
Wong, Ben
Wright, Matthew B.
Blander, Gil
Elliston, Keith O.
Ladd, William
Bobadilla, Maria
Mizrahi, Jacques
Haefliger, Carolina
Edgar, Alan
author_facet Deehan, Renée
Maerz-Weiss, Pia
Catlett, Natalie L.
Steiner, Guido
Wong, Ben
Wright, Matthew B.
Blander, Gil
Elliston, Keith O.
Ladd, William
Bobadilla, Maria
Mizrahi, Jacques
Haefliger, Carolina
Edgar, Alan
author_sort Deehan, Renée
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To compare the molecular and biologic signatures of a balanced dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α/γ agonist, aleglitazar, with tesaglitazar (a dual PPAR-α/γ agonist) or a combination of pioglitazone (Pio; PPAR-γ agonist) and fenofibrate (Feno; PPAR-α agonist) in human hepatocytes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Gene expression microarray profiles were obtained from primary human hepatocytes treated with EC(50)-aligned low, medium and high concentrations of the three treatments. A systems biology approach, Causal Network Modeling, was used to model the data to infer upstream molecular mechanisms that may explain the observed changes in gene expression. Aleglitazar, tesaglitazar and Pio/Feno each induced unique transcriptional signatures, despite comparable core PPAR signaling. Although all treatments inferred qualitatively similar PPAR-α signaling, aleglitazar was inferred to have greater effects on high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels than tesaglitazar and Pio/Feno, due to a greater number of gene expression changes in pathways related to high-density and low-density lipoprotein metabolism. Distinct transcriptional and biologic signatures were also inferred for stress responses, which appeared to be less affected by aleglitazar than the comparators. In particular, Pio/Feno was inferred to increase NFE2L2 activity, a key component of the stress response pathway, while aleglitazar had no significant effect. All treatments were inferred to decrease proliferative signaling. CONCLUSIONS: Aleglitazar induces transcriptional signatures related to lipid parameters and stress responses that are unique from other dual PPAR-α/γ treatments. This may underlie observed favorable changes in lipid profiles in animal and clinical studies with aleglitazar and suggests a differentiated gene profile compared with other dual PPAR-α/γ agonist treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3325914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33259142012-04-18 Comparative Transcriptional Network Modeling of Three PPAR-α/γ Co-Agonists Reveals Distinct Metabolic Gene Signatures in Primary Human Hepatocytes Deehan, Renée Maerz-Weiss, Pia Catlett, Natalie L. Steiner, Guido Wong, Ben Wright, Matthew B. Blander, Gil Elliston, Keith O. Ladd, William Bobadilla, Maria Mizrahi, Jacques Haefliger, Carolina Edgar, Alan PLoS One Research Article AIMS: To compare the molecular and biologic signatures of a balanced dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α/γ agonist, aleglitazar, with tesaglitazar (a dual PPAR-α/γ agonist) or a combination of pioglitazone (Pio; PPAR-γ agonist) and fenofibrate (Feno; PPAR-α agonist) in human hepatocytes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Gene expression microarray profiles were obtained from primary human hepatocytes treated with EC(50)-aligned low, medium and high concentrations of the three treatments. A systems biology approach, Causal Network Modeling, was used to model the data to infer upstream molecular mechanisms that may explain the observed changes in gene expression. Aleglitazar, tesaglitazar and Pio/Feno each induced unique transcriptional signatures, despite comparable core PPAR signaling. Although all treatments inferred qualitatively similar PPAR-α signaling, aleglitazar was inferred to have greater effects on high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels than tesaglitazar and Pio/Feno, due to a greater number of gene expression changes in pathways related to high-density and low-density lipoprotein metabolism. Distinct transcriptional and biologic signatures were also inferred for stress responses, which appeared to be less affected by aleglitazar than the comparators. In particular, Pio/Feno was inferred to increase NFE2L2 activity, a key component of the stress response pathway, while aleglitazar had no significant effect. All treatments were inferred to decrease proliferative signaling. CONCLUSIONS: Aleglitazar induces transcriptional signatures related to lipid parameters and stress responses that are unique from other dual PPAR-α/γ treatments. This may underlie observed favorable changes in lipid profiles in animal and clinical studies with aleglitazar and suggests a differentiated gene profile compared with other dual PPAR-α/γ agonist treatments. Public Library of Science 2012-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3325914/ /pubmed/22514701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035012 Text en Deehan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deehan, Renée
Maerz-Weiss, Pia
Catlett, Natalie L.
Steiner, Guido
Wong, Ben
Wright, Matthew B.
Blander, Gil
Elliston, Keith O.
Ladd, William
Bobadilla, Maria
Mizrahi, Jacques
Haefliger, Carolina
Edgar, Alan
Comparative Transcriptional Network Modeling of Three PPAR-α/γ Co-Agonists Reveals Distinct Metabolic Gene Signatures in Primary Human Hepatocytes
title Comparative Transcriptional Network Modeling of Three PPAR-α/γ Co-Agonists Reveals Distinct Metabolic Gene Signatures in Primary Human Hepatocytes
title_full Comparative Transcriptional Network Modeling of Three PPAR-α/γ Co-Agonists Reveals Distinct Metabolic Gene Signatures in Primary Human Hepatocytes
title_fullStr Comparative Transcriptional Network Modeling of Three PPAR-α/γ Co-Agonists Reveals Distinct Metabolic Gene Signatures in Primary Human Hepatocytes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Transcriptional Network Modeling of Three PPAR-α/γ Co-Agonists Reveals Distinct Metabolic Gene Signatures in Primary Human Hepatocytes
title_short Comparative Transcriptional Network Modeling of Three PPAR-α/γ Co-Agonists Reveals Distinct Metabolic Gene Signatures in Primary Human Hepatocytes
title_sort comparative transcriptional network modeling of three ppar-α/γ co-agonists reveals distinct metabolic gene signatures in primary human hepatocytes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3325914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22514701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035012
work_keys_str_mv AT deehanrenee comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT maerzweisspia comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT catlettnataliel comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT steinerguido comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT wongben comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT wrightmatthewb comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT blandergil comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT ellistonkeitho comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT laddwilliam comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT bobadillamaria comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT mizrahijacques comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT haefligercarolina comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes
AT edgaralan comparativetranscriptionalnetworkmodelingofthreepparagcoagonistsrevealsdistinctmetabolicgenesignaturesinprimaryhumanhepatocytes