Cargando…

Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction

Ideal free distribution (IFD) models predict that animals distribute themselves such that no individual can increase its fitness by moving to another patch. Many empirical tests assume that the interference among animals is independent of density and do not quantify the effects of density on fitness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Hammen, Tessa, Montserrat, Marta, Sabelis, Maurice W., de Roos, André M., Janssen, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22081260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2190-y
_version_ 1782229507352035328
author van der Hammen, Tessa
Montserrat, Marta
Sabelis, Maurice W.
de Roos, André M.
Janssen, Arne
author_facet van der Hammen, Tessa
Montserrat, Marta
Sabelis, Maurice W.
de Roos, André M.
Janssen, Arne
author_sort van der Hammen, Tessa
collection PubMed
description Ideal free distribution (IFD) models predict that animals distribute themselves such that no individual can increase its fitness by moving to another patch. Many empirical tests assume that the interference among animals is independent of density and do not quantify the effects of density on fitness traits. Using two species of predatory mites, we measured oviposition as a function of conspecific density. Subsequently, we used these functions to calculate expected distributions on two connected patches. We performed an experimental test of the distributions of mites on two such connected patches, among which one had a food accessibility rate that was twice as high as on the other. For one of the two species, Iphiseius degenerans, the distribution matched the expected distribution. The distribution also coincided with the ratio of food accessibility. The other species, Neoseiulus cucumeris, distributed itself differently than expected. However, the oviposition rates of both species did not differ significantly from the expected oviposition rates based on experiments on single patches. This suggests that the oviposition rate of N. cucumeris was not negatively affected by the observed distribution, despite the fact that N. cucumeris did not match the predicted distributions. Thus, the distribution of one mite species, I. degenerans, was in agreement with IFD theory, whereas for the other mite species, N. cucumeris, unknown factors may have influenced the distribution of the mites. We conclude that density-dependent fitness traits provide essential information for explaining animal distributions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3326238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33262382012-04-20 Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction van der Hammen, Tessa Montserrat, Marta Sabelis, Maurice W. de Roos, André M. Janssen, Arne Oecologia Behavioral ecology - Original research paper Ideal free distribution (IFD) models predict that animals distribute themselves such that no individual can increase its fitness by moving to another patch. Many empirical tests assume that the interference among animals is independent of density and do not quantify the effects of density on fitness traits. Using two species of predatory mites, we measured oviposition as a function of conspecific density. Subsequently, we used these functions to calculate expected distributions on two connected patches. We performed an experimental test of the distributions of mites on two such connected patches, among which one had a food accessibility rate that was twice as high as on the other. For one of the two species, Iphiseius degenerans, the distribution matched the expected distribution. The distribution also coincided with the ratio of food accessibility. The other species, Neoseiulus cucumeris, distributed itself differently than expected. However, the oviposition rates of both species did not differ significantly from the expected oviposition rates based on experiments on single patches. This suggests that the oviposition rate of N. cucumeris was not negatively affected by the observed distribution, despite the fact that N. cucumeris did not match the predicted distributions. Thus, the distribution of one mite species, I. degenerans, was in agreement with IFD theory, whereas for the other mite species, N. cucumeris, unknown factors may have influenced the distribution of the mites. We conclude that density-dependent fitness traits provide essential information for explaining animal distributions. Springer-Verlag 2011-11-12 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3326238/ /pubmed/22081260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2190-y Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Behavioral ecology - Original research paper
van der Hammen, Tessa
Montserrat, Marta
Sabelis, Maurice W.
de Roos, André M.
Janssen, Arne
Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction
title Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction
title_full Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction
title_fullStr Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction
title_full_unstemmed Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction
title_short Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction
title_sort whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction
topic Behavioral ecology - Original research paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22081260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2190-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderhammentessa whetheridealfreeornotpredatorymitesdistributesoastomaximizereproduction
AT montserratmarta whetheridealfreeornotpredatorymitesdistributesoastomaximizereproduction
AT sabelismauricew whetheridealfreeornotpredatorymitesdistributesoastomaximizereproduction
AT deroosandrem whetheridealfreeornotpredatorymitesdistributesoastomaximizereproduction
AT janssenarne whetheridealfreeornotpredatorymitesdistributesoastomaximizereproduction