Cargando…
Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction
Ideal free distribution (IFD) models predict that animals distribute themselves such that no individual can increase its fitness by moving to another patch. Many empirical tests assume that the interference among animals is independent of density and do not quantify the effects of density on fitness...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22081260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2190-y |
_version_ | 1782229507352035328 |
---|---|
author | van der Hammen, Tessa Montserrat, Marta Sabelis, Maurice W. de Roos, André M. Janssen, Arne |
author_facet | van der Hammen, Tessa Montserrat, Marta Sabelis, Maurice W. de Roos, André M. Janssen, Arne |
author_sort | van der Hammen, Tessa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ideal free distribution (IFD) models predict that animals distribute themselves such that no individual can increase its fitness by moving to another patch. Many empirical tests assume that the interference among animals is independent of density and do not quantify the effects of density on fitness traits. Using two species of predatory mites, we measured oviposition as a function of conspecific density. Subsequently, we used these functions to calculate expected distributions on two connected patches. We performed an experimental test of the distributions of mites on two such connected patches, among which one had a food accessibility rate that was twice as high as on the other. For one of the two species, Iphiseius degenerans, the distribution matched the expected distribution. The distribution also coincided with the ratio of food accessibility. The other species, Neoseiulus cucumeris, distributed itself differently than expected. However, the oviposition rates of both species did not differ significantly from the expected oviposition rates based on experiments on single patches. This suggests that the oviposition rate of N. cucumeris was not negatively affected by the observed distribution, despite the fact that N. cucumeris did not match the predicted distributions. Thus, the distribution of one mite species, I. degenerans, was in agreement with IFD theory, whereas for the other mite species, N. cucumeris, unknown factors may have influenced the distribution of the mites. We conclude that density-dependent fitness traits provide essential information for explaining animal distributions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3326238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33262382012-04-20 Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction van der Hammen, Tessa Montserrat, Marta Sabelis, Maurice W. de Roos, André M. Janssen, Arne Oecologia Behavioral ecology - Original research paper Ideal free distribution (IFD) models predict that animals distribute themselves such that no individual can increase its fitness by moving to another patch. Many empirical tests assume that the interference among animals is independent of density and do not quantify the effects of density on fitness traits. Using two species of predatory mites, we measured oviposition as a function of conspecific density. Subsequently, we used these functions to calculate expected distributions on two connected patches. We performed an experimental test of the distributions of mites on two such connected patches, among which one had a food accessibility rate that was twice as high as on the other. For one of the two species, Iphiseius degenerans, the distribution matched the expected distribution. The distribution also coincided with the ratio of food accessibility. The other species, Neoseiulus cucumeris, distributed itself differently than expected. However, the oviposition rates of both species did not differ significantly from the expected oviposition rates based on experiments on single patches. This suggests that the oviposition rate of N. cucumeris was not negatively affected by the observed distribution, despite the fact that N. cucumeris did not match the predicted distributions. Thus, the distribution of one mite species, I. degenerans, was in agreement with IFD theory, whereas for the other mite species, N. cucumeris, unknown factors may have influenced the distribution of the mites. We conclude that density-dependent fitness traits provide essential information for explaining animal distributions. Springer-Verlag 2011-11-12 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3326238/ /pubmed/22081260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2190-y Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Behavioral ecology - Original research paper van der Hammen, Tessa Montserrat, Marta Sabelis, Maurice W. de Roos, André M. Janssen, Arne Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction |
title | Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction |
title_full | Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction |
title_fullStr | Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction |
title_full_unstemmed | Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction |
title_short | Whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction |
title_sort | whether ideal free or not, predatory mites distribute so as to maximize reproduction |
topic | Behavioral ecology - Original research paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22081260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2190-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderhammentessa whetheridealfreeornotpredatorymitesdistributesoastomaximizereproduction AT montserratmarta whetheridealfreeornotpredatorymitesdistributesoastomaximizereproduction AT sabelismauricew whetheridealfreeornotpredatorymitesdistributesoastomaximizereproduction AT deroosandrem whetheridealfreeornotpredatorymitesdistributesoastomaximizereproduction AT janssenarne whetheridealfreeornotpredatorymitesdistributesoastomaximizereproduction |