Cargando…

Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT

The bioresorbable vascular stent (BVS) is totally translucent and radiolucent, leading to challenges when using conventional invasive imaging modalities. Agreement between quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the BVS is un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis, Serruys, Patrick W., Girasis, Chrysafios, Garg, Scot, Onuma, Yoshinobu, Brugaletta, Salvatore, García-García, Héctor, van Es, Gerrit-Anne, Regar, Evelyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21359517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9829-y
_version_ 1782229521174364160
author Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis
Serruys, Patrick W.
Girasis, Chrysafios
Garg, Scot
Onuma, Yoshinobu
Brugaletta, Salvatore
García-García, Héctor
van Es, Gerrit-Anne
Regar, Evelyn
author_facet Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis
Serruys, Patrick W.
Girasis, Chrysafios
Garg, Scot
Onuma, Yoshinobu
Brugaletta, Salvatore
García-García, Héctor
van Es, Gerrit-Anne
Regar, Evelyn
author_sort Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis
collection PubMed
description The bioresorbable vascular stent (BVS) is totally translucent and radiolucent, leading to challenges when using conventional invasive imaging modalities. Agreement between quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the BVS is unknown. Forty five patients enrolled in the ABSORB cohort B1 study underwent coronary angiography, IVUS and OCT immediately post BVS implantation, and at 6 months. OCT estimated stent length accurately compared to nominal length (95% CI of the difference: −0.19; 0.37 and −0.15; 0.47 mm(2) for baseline and 6 months, respectively), whereas QCA incurred consistent underestimation of the same magnitude at both time points (Pearson correlation = 0.806). IVUS yielded low accuracy (95% CI of the difference: 0.77; 3.74 and −1.15; 3.27 mm(2) for baseline and 6 months, respectively), with several outliers and random variability test–retest. Minimal lumen area (MLA) decreased substantially between baseline and 6 months on QCA and OCT and only minimally on IVUS (95% CI: 0.11; 0.42). Agreement between the different imaging modalities is poor: worst agreement Videodensitometry-IVUS post-implantation (ICCa 0.289); best agreement IVUS-OCT at baseline (ICCa 0.767). All pairs deviated significantly from linearity (P < 0.01). Passing-Bablok non-parametric orthogonal regression showed constant and proportional bias between IVUS and OCT. OCT is the most accurate technique for measuring stent length, whilst QCA incurs systematic underestimation (foreshortening) and solid state IVUS incurs random error. Volumetric calculations using solid state IVUS are therefore not reliable. There is poor agreement for MLA estimation between all the imaging modalities studied, including IVUS-OCT, hence their values are not interchangeable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-011-9829-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3326362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33263622012-04-20 Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis Serruys, Patrick W. Girasis, Chrysafios Garg, Scot Onuma, Yoshinobu Brugaletta, Salvatore García-García, Héctor van Es, Gerrit-Anne Regar, Evelyn Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper The bioresorbable vascular stent (BVS) is totally translucent and radiolucent, leading to challenges when using conventional invasive imaging modalities. Agreement between quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the BVS is unknown. Forty five patients enrolled in the ABSORB cohort B1 study underwent coronary angiography, IVUS and OCT immediately post BVS implantation, and at 6 months. OCT estimated stent length accurately compared to nominal length (95% CI of the difference: −0.19; 0.37 and −0.15; 0.47 mm(2) for baseline and 6 months, respectively), whereas QCA incurred consistent underestimation of the same magnitude at both time points (Pearson correlation = 0.806). IVUS yielded low accuracy (95% CI of the difference: 0.77; 3.74 and −1.15; 3.27 mm(2) for baseline and 6 months, respectively), with several outliers and random variability test–retest. Minimal lumen area (MLA) decreased substantially between baseline and 6 months on QCA and OCT and only minimally on IVUS (95% CI: 0.11; 0.42). Agreement between the different imaging modalities is poor: worst agreement Videodensitometry-IVUS post-implantation (ICCa 0.289); best agreement IVUS-OCT at baseline (ICCa 0.767). All pairs deviated significantly from linearity (P < 0.01). Passing-Bablok non-parametric orthogonal regression showed constant and proportional bias between IVUS and OCT. OCT is the most accurate technique for measuring stent length, whilst QCA incurs systematic underestimation (foreshortening) and solid state IVUS incurs random error. Volumetric calculations using solid state IVUS are therefore not reliable. There is poor agreement for MLA estimation between all the imaging modalities studied, including IVUS-OCT, hence their values are not interchangeable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-011-9829-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2011-02-26 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3326362/ /pubmed/21359517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9829-y Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis
Serruys, Patrick W.
Girasis, Chrysafios
Garg, Scot
Onuma, Yoshinobu
Brugaletta, Salvatore
García-García, Héctor
van Es, Gerrit-Anne
Regar, Evelyn
Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT
title Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT
title_full Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT
title_fullStr Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT
title_short Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT
title_sort quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between qca, ivus and oct
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21359517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9829-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gutierrezchicojuanluis quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct
AT serruyspatrickw quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct
AT girasischrysafios quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct
AT gargscot quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct
AT onumayoshinobu quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct
AT brugalettasalvatore quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct
AT garciagarciahector quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct
AT vanesgerritanne quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct
AT regarevelyn quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct