Cargando…
Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT
The bioresorbable vascular stent (BVS) is totally translucent and radiolucent, leading to challenges when using conventional invasive imaging modalities. Agreement between quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the BVS is un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21359517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9829-y |
_version_ | 1782229521174364160 |
---|---|
author | Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis Serruys, Patrick W. Girasis, Chrysafios Garg, Scot Onuma, Yoshinobu Brugaletta, Salvatore García-García, Héctor van Es, Gerrit-Anne Regar, Evelyn |
author_facet | Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis Serruys, Patrick W. Girasis, Chrysafios Garg, Scot Onuma, Yoshinobu Brugaletta, Salvatore García-García, Héctor van Es, Gerrit-Anne Regar, Evelyn |
author_sort | Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis |
collection | PubMed |
description | The bioresorbable vascular stent (BVS) is totally translucent and radiolucent, leading to challenges when using conventional invasive imaging modalities. Agreement between quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the BVS is unknown. Forty five patients enrolled in the ABSORB cohort B1 study underwent coronary angiography, IVUS and OCT immediately post BVS implantation, and at 6 months. OCT estimated stent length accurately compared to nominal length (95% CI of the difference: −0.19; 0.37 and −0.15; 0.47 mm(2) for baseline and 6 months, respectively), whereas QCA incurred consistent underestimation of the same magnitude at both time points (Pearson correlation = 0.806). IVUS yielded low accuracy (95% CI of the difference: 0.77; 3.74 and −1.15; 3.27 mm(2) for baseline and 6 months, respectively), with several outliers and random variability test–retest. Minimal lumen area (MLA) decreased substantially between baseline and 6 months on QCA and OCT and only minimally on IVUS (95% CI: 0.11; 0.42). Agreement between the different imaging modalities is poor: worst agreement Videodensitometry-IVUS post-implantation (ICCa 0.289); best agreement IVUS-OCT at baseline (ICCa 0.767). All pairs deviated significantly from linearity (P < 0.01). Passing-Bablok non-parametric orthogonal regression showed constant and proportional bias between IVUS and OCT. OCT is the most accurate technique for measuring stent length, whilst QCA incurs systematic underestimation (foreshortening) and solid state IVUS incurs random error. Volumetric calculations using solid state IVUS are therefore not reliable. There is poor agreement for MLA estimation between all the imaging modalities studied, including IVUS-OCT, hence their values are not interchangeable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-011-9829-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3326362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33263622012-04-20 Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis Serruys, Patrick W. Girasis, Chrysafios Garg, Scot Onuma, Yoshinobu Brugaletta, Salvatore García-García, Héctor van Es, Gerrit-Anne Regar, Evelyn Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper The bioresorbable vascular stent (BVS) is totally translucent and radiolucent, leading to challenges when using conventional invasive imaging modalities. Agreement between quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the BVS is unknown. Forty five patients enrolled in the ABSORB cohort B1 study underwent coronary angiography, IVUS and OCT immediately post BVS implantation, and at 6 months. OCT estimated stent length accurately compared to nominal length (95% CI of the difference: −0.19; 0.37 and −0.15; 0.47 mm(2) for baseline and 6 months, respectively), whereas QCA incurred consistent underestimation of the same magnitude at both time points (Pearson correlation = 0.806). IVUS yielded low accuracy (95% CI of the difference: 0.77; 3.74 and −1.15; 3.27 mm(2) for baseline and 6 months, respectively), with several outliers and random variability test–retest. Minimal lumen area (MLA) decreased substantially between baseline and 6 months on QCA and OCT and only minimally on IVUS (95% CI: 0.11; 0.42). Agreement between the different imaging modalities is poor: worst agreement Videodensitometry-IVUS post-implantation (ICCa 0.289); best agreement IVUS-OCT at baseline (ICCa 0.767). All pairs deviated significantly from linearity (P < 0.01). Passing-Bablok non-parametric orthogonal regression showed constant and proportional bias between IVUS and OCT. OCT is the most accurate technique for measuring stent length, whilst QCA incurs systematic underestimation (foreshortening) and solid state IVUS incurs random error. Volumetric calculations using solid state IVUS are therefore not reliable. There is poor agreement for MLA estimation between all the imaging modalities studied, including IVUS-OCT, hence their values are not interchangeable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-011-9829-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2011-02-26 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3326362/ /pubmed/21359517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9829-y Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Gutiérrez-Chico, Juan Luis Serruys, Patrick W. Girasis, Chrysafios Garg, Scot Onuma, Yoshinobu Brugaletta, Salvatore García-García, Héctor van Es, Gerrit-Anne Regar, Evelyn Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT |
title | Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT |
title_full | Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT |
title_fullStr | Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT |
title_short | Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT |
title_sort | quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between qca, ivus and oct |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21359517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9829-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gutierrezchicojuanluis quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct AT serruyspatrickw quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct AT girasischrysafios quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct AT gargscot quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct AT onumayoshinobu quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct AT brugalettasalvatore quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct AT garciagarciahector quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct AT vanesgerritanne quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct AT regarevelyn quantitativemultimodalityimaginganalysisofafullybioresorbablestentaheadtoheadcomparisonbetweenqcaivusandoct |