Cargando…

Occupational Exposure to Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Health Care Providers: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVES: To determine the population at risk, risk factors, and outcome of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in health care providers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of two and half year data of ongoing surveillance of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aggarwal, Varun, Seth, Anju, Chandra, Jagdish, Gupta, Rohini, Kumar, Praveen, Dutta, Ashok Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22529540
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.94024
_version_ 1782229574315147264
author Aggarwal, Varun
Seth, Anju
Chandra, Jagdish
Gupta, Rohini
Kumar, Praveen
Dutta, Ashok Kumar
author_facet Aggarwal, Varun
Seth, Anju
Chandra, Jagdish
Gupta, Rohini
Kumar, Praveen
Dutta, Ashok Kumar
author_sort Aggarwal, Varun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the population at risk, risk factors, and outcome of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in health care providers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of two and half year data of ongoing surveillance of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: 103 Health Care Providers (HCP) reported an occupational exposure to blood and body fluids during the period under review. These comprised 72 (69.9%) doctors, 20 (19.4%) nursing personnel, and 11 (10.6%) cleaning staff. Of the doctors, 65% were interns. 53.4% HCP had work experience of less than one year. Circumstances of exposure included clinical procedures (48%), sweeping/handling used sharps (29%), recapping (16%), and surgery (6.9%). 74.3% of the exposures were due to non-compliance with universal precautions and were thus preventable. The device most frequently implicated in causing injury was hollow bore needle (n=85, 82.5%). Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) status of the source was positive in 6.8% cases, negative in 53.4% cases, and unknown in remaining 39.8% cases. Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) was indicated in 100 (97.08%) cases and was initiated within 2 h of exposure in 26.8% HCP. In 23.2% HCP, PEP initiation was delayed beyond 72 h of exposure due to late reporting. Thirteen HCP received expanded and the remaining received basic regime. Of the 82 HCP followed up, 15 completed the full course, while 55 stopped PEP after the first dose due to negative source status. Twelve HCP with exposure to blood of unknown HIV status discontinued PEP despite counseling. Complete follow-up for seroconversion was very poor among the HCP. HIV status at 6 month of exposure is not known for any HCP. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to follow universal precautions including improper disposal of waste was responsible for majority of occupational exposures. HCP need to be sensitized regarding hospital waste management, management of occupational exposure, need for PEP, and continued follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3326807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33268072012-04-23 Occupational Exposure to Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Health Care Providers: A Retrospective Analysis Aggarwal, Varun Seth, Anju Chandra, Jagdish Gupta, Rohini Kumar, Praveen Dutta, Ashok Kumar Indian J Community Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: To determine the population at risk, risk factors, and outcome of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in health care providers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of two and half year data of ongoing surveillance of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: 103 Health Care Providers (HCP) reported an occupational exposure to blood and body fluids during the period under review. These comprised 72 (69.9%) doctors, 20 (19.4%) nursing personnel, and 11 (10.6%) cleaning staff. Of the doctors, 65% were interns. 53.4% HCP had work experience of less than one year. Circumstances of exposure included clinical procedures (48%), sweeping/handling used sharps (29%), recapping (16%), and surgery (6.9%). 74.3% of the exposures were due to non-compliance with universal precautions and were thus preventable. The device most frequently implicated in causing injury was hollow bore needle (n=85, 82.5%). Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) status of the source was positive in 6.8% cases, negative in 53.4% cases, and unknown in remaining 39.8% cases. Postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) was indicated in 100 (97.08%) cases and was initiated within 2 h of exposure in 26.8% HCP. In 23.2% HCP, PEP initiation was delayed beyond 72 h of exposure due to late reporting. Thirteen HCP received expanded and the remaining received basic regime. Of the 82 HCP followed up, 15 completed the full course, while 55 stopped PEP after the first dose due to negative source status. Twelve HCP with exposure to blood of unknown HIV status discontinued PEP despite counseling. Complete follow-up for seroconversion was very poor among the HCP. HIV status at 6 month of exposure is not known for any HCP. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to follow universal precautions including improper disposal of waste was responsible for majority of occupational exposures. HCP need to be sensitized regarding hospital waste management, management of occupational exposure, need for PEP, and continued follow-up. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3326807/ /pubmed/22529540 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.94024 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Community Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aggarwal, Varun
Seth, Anju
Chandra, Jagdish
Gupta, Rohini
Kumar, Praveen
Dutta, Ashok Kumar
Occupational Exposure to Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Health Care Providers: A Retrospective Analysis
title Occupational Exposure to Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Health Care Providers: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full Occupational Exposure to Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Health Care Providers: A Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr Occupational Exposure to Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Health Care Providers: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Occupational Exposure to Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Health Care Providers: A Retrospective Analysis
title_short Occupational Exposure to Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Health Care Providers: A Retrospective Analysis
title_sort occupational exposure to human immunodeficiency virus in health care providers: a retrospective analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22529540
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.94024
work_keys_str_mv AT aggarwalvarun occupationalexposuretohumanimmunodeficiencyvirusinhealthcareprovidersaretrospectiveanalysis
AT sethanju occupationalexposuretohumanimmunodeficiencyvirusinhealthcareprovidersaretrospectiveanalysis
AT chandrajagdish occupationalexposuretohumanimmunodeficiencyvirusinhealthcareprovidersaretrospectiveanalysis
AT guptarohini occupationalexposuretohumanimmunodeficiencyvirusinhealthcareprovidersaretrospectiveanalysis
AT kumarpraveen occupationalexposuretohumanimmunodeficiencyvirusinhealthcareprovidersaretrospectiveanalysis
AT duttaashokkumar occupationalexposuretohumanimmunodeficiencyvirusinhealthcareprovidersaretrospectiveanalysis