Cargando…

A new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity

BACKGROUND: A screening of ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency is required for overhead throwers, since secondary pathologic changes result from an increased elbow valgus laxity. We developed a new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity and investigated the reliability of this method an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yasui, Kenji, Mihata, Teruhisa, Takeda, Atsushi, Watanabe, Chisato, Kinoshita, Mitsuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22429865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-4-11
_version_ 1782229669522702336
author Yasui, Kenji
Mihata, Teruhisa
Takeda, Atsushi
Watanabe, Chisato
Kinoshita, Mitsuo
author_facet Yasui, Kenji
Mihata, Teruhisa
Takeda, Atsushi
Watanabe, Chisato
Kinoshita, Mitsuo
author_sort Yasui, Kenji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A screening of ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency is required for overhead throwers, since secondary pathologic changes result from an increased elbow valgus laxity. We developed a new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity and investigated the reliability of this method and its correlation with ultrasonographic assessment. METHODS: We defined elbow valgus laxity as the difference between the shoulder external rotation angle (ER angle) measured with the elbow in 90 degrees flexion and that measured with the elbow in extension because ER angle measured with the elbow in 90 degrees flexion includes elbow valgus laxity and ER angle with the elbow in extension does not include it. ER angle measurement with the elbow in extension involved the use of a custom arm holder. Three examiners each measured elbow valgus laxity by the new method in 5 healthy volunteers. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient. We then assessed 19 high-school baseball players with no complaints of shoulder or elbow pain. Elbow ultrasonography was performed with a 10-MHz linear transducer with the elbow in 90 degrees flexion, and the forearm in the neutral position, and the width of the medial joint space at the level of the anterior bundle was measured. Elbow valgus laxity assessed by ultrasonography was defined as the difference between the medial joint space width with gravity stress and that without gravity stress. Increased elbow valgus laxity assessed by both our method and ultrasonography was defined as the difference between the laxity of the elbow on the throwing side and that on the contralateral side. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was calculated to evaluate the relationship between increased elbow valgus laxity obtained by our manual method and that by ultrasonography. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability ranged from 0.92 to 0.98, and interobserver reliability was 0.70. The increased elbow valgus laxity assessed by our method was significantly correlated with that assessed by ultrasonographic assessment (P = 0.019, r = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Elbow valgus laxity can be assessed by our method. This method may be useful for screening for insufficiency of the ulnar collateral ligament.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3327632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33276322012-04-17 A new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity Yasui, Kenji Mihata, Teruhisa Takeda, Atsushi Watanabe, Chisato Kinoshita, Mitsuo Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol Research BACKGROUND: A screening of ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency is required for overhead throwers, since secondary pathologic changes result from an increased elbow valgus laxity. We developed a new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity and investigated the reliability of this method and its correlation with ultrasonographic assessment. METHODS: We defined elbow valgus laxity as the difference between the shoulder external rotation angle (ER angle) measured with the elbow in 90 degrees flexion and that measured with the elbow in extension because ER angle measured with the elbow in 90 degrees flexion includes elbow valgus laxity and ER angle with the elbow in extension does not include it. ER angle measurement with the elbow in extension involved the use of a custom arm holder. Three examiners each measured elbow valgus laxity by the new method in 5 healthy volunteers. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient. We then assessed 19 high-school baseball players with no complaints of shoulder or elbow pain. Elbow ultrasonography was performed with a 10-MHz linear transducer with the elbow in 90 degrees flexion, and the forearm in the neutral position, and the width of the medial joint space at the level of the anterior bundle was measured. Elbow valgus laxity assessed by ultrasonography was defined as the difference between the medial joint space width with gravity stress and that without gravity stress. Increased elbow valgus laxity assessed by both our method and ultrasonography was defined as the difference between the laxity of the elbow on the throwing side and that on the contralateral side. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was calculated to evaluate the relationship between increased elbow valgus laxity obtained by our manual method and that by ultrasonography. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability ranged from 0.92 to 0.98, and interobserver reliability was 0.70. The increased elbow valgus laxity assessed by our method was significantly correlated with that assessed by ultrasonographic assessment (P = 0.019, r = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Elbow valgus laxity can be assessed by our method. This method may be useful for screening for insufficiency of the ulnar collateral ligament. BioMed Central 2012-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3327632/ /pubmed/22429865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-4-11 Text en Copyright ©2012 Yasui et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Yasui, Kenji
Mihata, Teruhisa
Takeda, Atsushi
Watanabe, Chisato
Kinoshita, Mitsuo
A new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity
title A new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity
title_full A new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity
title_fullStr A new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity
title_full_unstemmed A new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity
title_short A new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity
title_sort new manual method for assessing elbow valgus laxity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22429865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-4-11
work_keys_str_mv AT yasuikenji anewmanualmethodforassessingelbowvalguslaxity
AT mihatateruhisa anewmanualmethodforassessingelbowvalguslaxity
AT takedaatsushi anewmanualmethodforassessingelbowvalguslaxity
AT watanabechisato anewmanualmethodforassessingelbowvalguslaxity
AT kinoshitamitsuo anewmanualmethodforassessingelbowvalguslaxity
AT yasuikenji newmanualmethodforassessingelbowvalguslaxity
AT mihatateruhisa newmanualmethodforassessingelbowvalguslaxity
AT takedaatsushi newmanualmethodforassessingelbowvalguslaxity
AT watanabechisato newmanualmethodforassessingelbowvalguslaxity
AT kinoshitamitsuo newmanualmethodforassessingelbowvalguslaxity