Cargando…
Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2)
Resistant starch (RS), fed as high amylose maize starch (HAMS) or butyrylated HAMS (HAMSB), opposes dietary protein-induced colonocyte DNA damage in rats. In this study, rats were fed Western-type diets moderate in fat (19%) and protein (20%) containing digestible starches [low amylose maize starch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Nutrition
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.147660 |
_version_ | 1782229689874513920 |
---|---|
author | Conlon, Michael A. Kerr, Caroline A. McSweeney, Christopher S. Dunne, Robert A. Shaw, Janet M. Kang, Seungha Bird, Anthony R. Morell, Matthew K. Lockett, Trevor J. Molloy, Peter L. Regina, Ahmed Toden, Shusuke Clarke, Julie M. Topping, David L. |
author_facet | Conlon, Michael A. Kerr, Caroline A. McSweeney, Christopher S. Dunne, Robert A. Shaw, Janet M. Kang, Seungha Bird, Anthony R. Morell, Matthew K. Lockett, Trevor J. Molloy, Peter L. Regina, Ahmed Toden, Shusuke Clarke, Julie M. Topping, David L. |
author_sort | Conlon, Michael A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Resistant starch (RS), fed as high amylose maize starch (HAMS) or butyrylated HAMS (HAMSB), opposes dietary protein-induced colonocyte DNA damage in rats. In this study, rats were fed Western-type diets moderate in fat (19%) and protein (20%) containing digestible starches [low amylose maize starch (LAMS) or low amylose whole wheat (LAW)] or RS [HAMS, HAMSB, or a whole high amylose wheat (HAW) generated by RNA interference] for 11 wk (n = 10/group). A control diet included 7% fat, 13% protein, and LAMS. Colonocyte DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) were significantly higher (by 70%) in rats fed the Western diet containing LAMS relative to controls. Dietary HAW, HAMS, and HAMSB opposed this effect while raising digesta levels of SCFA and lowering ammonia and phenol levels. SSB correlated inversely with total large bowel SCFA, including colonic butyrate concentration (R(2) = 0.40; P = 0.009), and positively with colonic ammonia concentration (R(2) = 0.40; P = 0.014). Analysis of gut microbiota populations using a phylogenetic microarray revealed profiles that fell into 3 distinct groups: control and LAMS; HAMS and HAMSB; and LAW and HAW. The expression of colonic genes associated with the maintenance of genomic integrity (notably Mdm2, Top1, Msh3, Ung, Rere, Cebpa, Gmnn, and Parg) was altered and varied with RS source. HAW is as effective as HAMS and HAMSB in opposing diet-induced colonic DNA damage in rats, but their effects on the large bowel microbiota and colonocyte gene expression differ, possibly due to the presence of other fiber components in HAW. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3327741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | American Society for Nutrition |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33277412012-04-24 Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2) Conlon, Michael A. Kerr, Caroline A. McSweeney, Christopher S. Dunne, Robert A. Shaw, Janet M. Kang, Seungha Bird, Anthony R. Morell, Matthew K. Lockett, Trevor J. Molloy, Peter L. Regina, Ahmed Toden, Shusuke Clarke, Julie M. Topping, David L. J Nutr Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions Resistant starch (RS), fed as high amylose maize starch (HAMS) or butyrylated HAMS (HAMSB), opposes dietary protein-induced colonocyte DNA damage in rats. In this study, rats were fed Western-type diets moderate in fat (19%) and protein (20%) containing digestible starches [low amylose maize starch (LAMS) or low amylose whole wheat (LAW)] or RS [HAMS, HAMSB, or a whole high amylose wheat (HAW) generated by RNA interference] for 11 wk (n = 10/group). A control diet included 7% fat, 13% protein, and LAMS. Colonocyte DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) were significantly higher (by 70%) in rats fed the Western diet containing LAMS relative to controls. Dietary HAW, HAMS, and HAMSB opposed this effect while raising digesta levels of SCFA and lowering ammonia and phenol levels. SSB correlated inversely with total large bowel SCFA, including colonic butyrate concentration (R(2) = 0.40; P = 0.009), and positively with colonic ammonia concentration (R(2) = 0.40; P = 0.014). Analysis of gut microbiota populations using a phylogenetic microarray revealed profiles that fell into 3 distinct groups: control and LAMS; HAMS and HAMSB; and LAW and HAW. The expression of colonic genes associated with the maintenance of genomic integrity (notably Mdm2, Top1, Msh3, Ung, Rere, Cebpa, Gmnn, and Parg) was altered and varied with RS source. HAW is as effective as HAMS and HAMSB in opposing diet-induced colonic DNA damage in rats, but their effects on the large bowel microbiota and colonocyte gene expression differ, possibly due to the presence of other fiber components in HAW. American Society for Nutrition 2012-05 2012-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3327741/ /pubmed/22457395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.147660 Text en © 2012 American Society for Nutrition http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is a free access article, distributed under terms (http://www.nutrition.org/publications/guidelines-and-policies/license/) which permit unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions Conlon, Michael A. Kerr, Caroline A. McSweeney, Christopher S. Dunne, Robert A. Shaw, Janet M. Kang, Seungha Bird, Anthony R. Morell, Matthew K. Lockett, Trevor J. Molloy, Peter L. Regina, Ahmed Toden, Shusuke Clarke, Julie M. Topping, David L. Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2) |
title | Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2) |
title_full | Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2) |
title_fullStr | Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2) |
title_full_unstemmed | Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2) |
title_short | Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2) |
title_sort | resistant starches protect against colonic dna damage and alter microbiota and gene expression in rats fed a western diet(2) |
topic | Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.147660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conlonmichaela resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT kerrcarolinea resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT mcsweeneychristophers resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT dunneroberta resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT shawjanetm resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT kangseungha resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT birdanthonyr resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT morellmatthewk resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT locketttrevorj resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT molloypeterl resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT reginaahmed resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT todenshusuke resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT clarkejuliem resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 AT toppingdavidl resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2 |