Cargando…

Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2)

Resistant starch (RS), fed as high amylose maize starch (HAMS) or butyrylated HAMS (HAMSB), opposes dietary protein-induced colonocyte DNA damage in rats. In this study, rats were fed Western-type diets moderate in fat (19%) and protein (20%) containing digestible starches [low amylose maize starch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conlon, Michael A., Kerr, Caroline A., McSweeney, Christopher S., Dunne, Robert A., Shaw, Janet M., Kang, Seungha, Bird, Anthony R., Morell, Matthew K., Lockett, Trevor J., Molloy, Peter L., Regina, Ahmed, Toden, Shusuke, Clarke, Julie M., Topping, David L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Nutrition 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.147660
_version_ 1782229689874513920
author Conlon, Michael A.
Kerr, Caroline A.
McSweeney, Christopher S.
Dunne, Robert A.
Shaw, Janet M.
Kang, Seungha
Bird, Anthony R.
Morell, Matthew K.
Lockett, Trevor J.
Molloy, Peter L.
Regina, Ahmed
Toden, Shusuke
Clarke, Julie M.
Topping, David L.
author_facet Conlon, Michael A.
Kerr, Caroline A.
McSweeney, Christopher S.
Dunne, Robert A.
Shaw, Janet M.
Kang, Seungha
Bird, Anthony R.
Morell, Matthew K.
Lockett, Trevor J.
Molloy, Peter L.
Regina, Ahmed
Toden, Shusuke
Clarke, Julie M.
Topping, David L.
author_sort Conlon, Michael A.
collection PubMed
description Resistant starch (RS), fed as high amylose maize starch (HAMS) or butyrylated HAMS (HAMSB), opposes dietary protein-induced colonocyte DNA damage in rats. In this study, rats were fed Western-type diets moderate in fat (19%) and protein (20%) containing digestible starches [low amylose maize starch (LAMS) or low amylose whole wheat (LAW)] or RS [HAMS, HAMSB, or a whole high amylose wheat (HAW) generated by RNA interference] for 11 wk (n = 10/group). A control diet included 7% fat, 13% protein, and LAMS. Colonocyte DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) were significantly higher (by 70%) in rats fed the Western diet containing LAMS relative to controls. Dietary HAW, HAMS, and HAMSB opposed this effect while raising digesta levels of SCFA and lowering ammonia and phenol levels. SSB correlated inversely with total large bowel SCFA, including colonic butyrate concentration (R(2) = 0.40; P = 0.009), and positively with colonic ammonia concentration (R(2) = 0.40; P = 0.014). Analysis of gut microbiota populations using a phylogenetic microarray revealed profiles that fell into 3 distinct groups: control and LAMS; HAMS and HAMSB; and LAW and HAW. The expression of colonic genes associated with the maintenance of genomic integrity (notably Mdm2, Top1, Msh3, Ung, Rere, Cebpa, Gmnn, and Parg) was altered and varied with RS source. HAW is as effective as HAMS and HAMSB in opposing diet-induced colonic DNA damage in rats, but their effects on the large bowel microbiota and colonocyte gene expression differ, possibly due to the presence of other fiber components in HAW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3327741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher American Society for Nutrition
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33277412012-04-24 Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2) Conlon, Michael A. Kerr, Caroline A. McSweeney, Christopher S. Dunne, Robert A. Shaw, Janet M. Kang, Seungha Bird, Anthony R. Morell, Matthew K. Lockett, Trevor J. Molloy, Peter L. Regina, Ahmed Toden, Shusuke Clarke, Julie M. Topping, David L. J Nutr Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions Resistant starch (RS), fed as high amylose maize starch (HAMS) or butyrylated HAMS (HAMSB), opposes dietary protein-induced colonocyte DNA damage in rats. In this study, rats were fed Western-type diets moderate in fat (19%) and protein (20%) containing digestible starches [low amylose maize starch (LAMS) or low amylose whole wheat (LAW)] or RS [HAMS, HAMSB, or a whole high amylose wheat (HAW) generated by RNA interference] for 11 wk (n = 10/group). A control diet included 7% fat, 13% protein, and LAMS. Colonocyte DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) were significantly higher (by 70%) in rats fed the Western diet containing LAMS relative to controls. Dietary HAW, HAMS, and HAMSB opposed this effect while raising digesta levels of SCFA and lowering ammonia and phenol levels. SSB correlated inversely with total large bowel SCFA, including colonic butyrate concentration (R(2) = 0.40; P = 0.009), and positively with colonic ammonia concentration (R(2) = 0.40; P = 0.014). Analysis of gut microbiota populations using a phylogenetic microarray revealed profiles that fell into 3 distinct groups: control and LAMS; HAMS and HAMSB; and LAW and HAW. The expression of colonic genes associated with the maintenance of genomic integrity (notably Mdm2, Top1, Msh3, Ung, Rere, Cebpa, Gmnn, and Parg) was altered and varied with RS source. HAW is as effective as HAMS and HAMSB in opposing diet-induced colonic DNA damage in rats, but their effects on the large bowel microbiota and colonocyte gene expression differ, possibly due to the presence of other fiber components in HAW. American Society for Nutrition 2012-05 2012-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3327741/ /pubmed/22457395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.147660 Text en © 2012 American Society for Nutrition http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is a free access article, distributed under terms (http://www.nutrition.org/publications/guidelines-and-policies/license/) which permit unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions
Conlon, Michael A.
Kerr, Caroline A.
McSweeney, Christopher S.
Dunne, Robert A.
Shaw, Janet M.
Kang, Seungha
Bird, Anthony R.
Morell, Matthew K.
Lockett, Trevor J.
Molloy, Peter L.
Regina, Ahmed
Toden, Shusuke
Clarke, Julie M.
Topping, David L.
Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2)
title Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2)
title_full Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2)
title_fullStr Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2)
title_full_unstemmed Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2)
title_short Resistant Starches Protect against Colonic DNA Damage and Alter Microbiota and Gene Expression in Rats Fed a Western Diet(2)
title_sort resistant starches protect against colonic dna damage and alter microbiota and gene expression in rats fed a western diet(2)
topic Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22457395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.147660
work_keys_str_mv AT conlonmichaela resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT kerrcarolinea resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT mcsweeneychristophers resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT dunneroberta resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT shawjanetm resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT kangseungha resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT birdanthonyr resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT morellmatthewk resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT locketttrevorj resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT molloypeterl resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT reginaahmed resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT todenshusuke resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT clarkejuliem resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2
AT toppingdavidl resistantstarchesprotectagainstcolonicdnadamageandaltermicrobiotaandgeneexpressioninratsfedawesterndiet2