Cargando…

Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice?

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopy is a step forward toward nearly scarless surgery. Concern has been raised that single-incision laparoscopy is technically more challenging than conventional laparoscopy. This study researched the performance curves of novice trainees for single-incision laparo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fransen, S. A. F., Mertens, L. S., Botden, S. M. B. I., Stassen, L. P. S., Bouvy, N. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22101419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2041-2
_version_ 1782229691034238976
author Fransen, S. A. F.
Mertens, L. S.
Botden, S. M. B. I.
Stassen, L. P. S.
Bouvy, N. D.
author_facet Fransen, S. A. F.
Mertens, L. S.
Botden, S. M. B. I.
Stassen, L. P. S.
Bouvy, N. D.
author_sort Fransen, S. A. F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopy is a step forward toward nearly scarless surgery. Concern has been raised that single-incision laparoscopy is technically more challenging than conventional laparoscopy. This study researched the performance curves of novice trainees for single-incision laparoscopy (SILS) versus conventional laparoscopy for performing two basic tasks on a box trainer. METHODS: In this study, 20 novice participants performed two tasks (peg transfer and a dissection task) on a standard box trainer. All the participants practiced each task 11 times and were randomized in two groups. The first group performed the tasks on a box trainer through three incisions. The second group used a single-incision access with the same box trainer. The assessment scores for errors and time were recorded. The 2nd, 8th, and 11th runs of both tasks in both settings were assessed to objectify the gain in basic laparoscopic skills. RESULTS: The performance curves for both groups improved significantly in terms of both time and errors in performing the two tasks [P < 0.01, analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. For the first task, no significant difference in time between the two groups was observed at the top of the performance curve (mean, 212 ± 64 vs. 182 ± 48 s), but the SILS group performed with fewer errors (1.3 ± 1.5 vs. 2.7 ± 2.11). However, the difference was not significant (P = 0.10). The dissection task was performed faster in the SILS group (mean, 205 ± 78 vs. 243 ± 40 s; P = 0, 18) with fewer errors (0.7 ± 1.05 vs. 1.9 ± 2.1; P = 0. 12), but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant improvement in basic skills for both the SILS and conventional laparoscopy settings after 11 repetitions. These data suggest that box training shows no significant difference between conventional laparoscopic and single-incision laparoscopic settings in terms of error or time in performing basic tasks at a low complexity level for the novice. These data also show significant improvement in basic skills over a relatively short period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3327835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33278352012-05-14 Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice? Fransen, S. A. F. Mertens, L. S. Botden, S. M. B. I. Stassen, L. P. S. Bouvy, N. D. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopy is a step forward toward nearly scarless surgery. Concern has been raised that single-incision laparoscopy is technically more challenging than conventional laparoscopy. This study researched the performance curves of novice trainees for single-incision laparoscopy (SILS) versus conventional laparoscopy for performing two basic tasks on a box trainer. METHODS: In this study, 20 novice participants performed two tasks (peg transfer and a dissection task) on a standard box trainer. All the participants practiced each task 11 times and were randomized in two groups. The first group performed the tasks on a box trainer through three incisions. The second group used a single-incision access with the same box trainer. The assessment scores for errors and time were recorded. The 2nd, 8th, and 11th runs of both tasks in both settings were assessed to objectify the gain in basic laparoscopic skills. RESULTS: The performance curves for both groups improved significantly in terms of both time and errors in performing the two tasks [P < 0.01, analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. For the first task, no significant difference in time between the two groups was observed at the top of the performance curve (mean, 212 ± 64 vs. 182 ± 48 s), but the SILS group performed with fewer errors (1.3 ± 1.5 vs. 2.7 ± 2.11). However, the difference was not significant (P = 0.10). The dissection task was performed faster in the SILS group (mean, 205 ± 78 vs. 243 ± 40 s; P = 0, 18) with fewer errors (0.7 ± 1.05 vs. 1.9 ± 2.1; P = 0. 12), but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant improvement in basic skills for both the SILS and conventional laparoscopy settings after 11 repetitions. These data suggest that box training shows no significant difference between conventional laparoscopic and single-incision laparoscopic settings in terms of error or time in performing basic tasks at a low complexity level for the novice. These data also show significant improvement in basic skills over a relatively short period. Springer-Verlag 2011-11-20 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3327835/ /pubmed/22101419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2041-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Fransen, S. A. F.
Mertens, L. S.
Botden, S. M. B. I.
Stassen, L. P. S.
Bouvy, N. D.
Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice?
title Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice?
title_full Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice?
title_fullStr Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice?
title_full_unstemmed Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice?
title_short Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice?
title_sort performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: is it really more difficult for the novice?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22101419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2041-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fransensaf performancecurveofbasicskillsinsingleincisionlaparoscopyversusconventionallaparoscopyisitreallymoredifficultforthenovice
AT mertensls performancecurveofbasicskillsinsingleincisionlaparoscopyversusconventionallaparoscopyisitreallymoredifficultforthenovice
AT botdensmbi performancecurveofbasicskillsinsingleincisionlaparoscopyversusconventionallaparoscopyisitreallymoredifficultforthenovice
AT stassenlps performancecurveofbasicskillsinsingleincisionlaparoscopyversusconventionallaparoscopyisitreallymoredifficultforthenovice
AT bouvynd performancecurveofbasicskillsinsingleincisionlaparoscopyversusconventionallaparoscopyisitreallymoredifficultforthenovice