Cargando…
Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium
BACKGROUND: Job strain (i.e., high job demands combined with low job control) is a frequently used indicator of harmful work stress, but studies have often used partial versions of the complete multi-item job demands and control scales. Understanding whether the different instruments assess the same...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3328260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22264402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-62 |
_version_ | 1782229714974277632 |
---|---|
author | Fransson, Eleonor I Nyberg, Solja T Heikkilä, Katriina Alfredsson, Lars Bacquer, De Dirk Batty, G David Bonenfant, Sébastien Casini, Annalisa Clays, Els Goldberg, Marcel Kittel, France Koskenvuo, Markku Knutsson, Anders Leineweber, Constanze Magnusson Hanson, Linda L Nordin, Maria Singh-Manoux, Archana Suominen, Sakari Vahtera, Jussi Westerholm, Peter Westerlund, Hugo Zins, Marie Theorell, Töres Kivimäki, Mika |
author_facet | Fransson, Eleonor I Nyberg, Solja T Heikkilä, Katriina Alfredsson, Lars Bacquer, De Dirk Batty, G David Bonenfant, Sébastien Casini, Annalisa Clays, Els Goldberg, Marcel Kittel, France Koskenvuo, Markku Knutsson, Anders Leineweber, Constanze Magnusson Hanson, Linda L Nordin, Maria Singh-Manoux, Archana Suominen, Sakari Vahtera, Jussi Westerholm, Peter Westerlund, Hugo Zins, Marie Theorell, Töres Kivimäki, Mika |
author_sort | Fransson, Eleonor I |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Job strain (i.e., high job demands combined with low job control) is a frequently used indicator of harmful work stress, but studies have often used partial versions of the complete multi-item job demands and control scales. Understanding whether the different instruments assess the same underlying concepts has crucial implications for the interpretation of findings across studies, harmonisation of multi-cohort data for pooled analyses, and design of future studies. As part of the 'IPD-Work' (Individual-participant-data meta-analysis in working populations) consortium, we compared different versions of the demands and control scales available in 17 European cohort studies. METHODS: Six of the 17 studies had information on the complete scales and 11 on partial scales. Here, we analyse individual level data from 70 751 participants of the studies which had complete scales (5 demand items, 6 job control items). RESULTS: We found high Pearson correlation coefficients between complete scales of job demands and control relative to scales with at least three items (r > 0.90) and for partial scales with two items only (r = 0.76-0.88). In comparison with scores from the complete scales, the agreement between job strain definitions was very good when only one item was missing in either the demands or the control scale (kappa > 0.80); good for job strain assessed with three demand items and all six control items (kappa > 0.68) and moderate to good when items were missing from both scales (kappa = 0.54-0.76). The sensitivity was > 0.80 when only one item was missing from either scale, decreasing when several items were missing in one or both job strain subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Partial job demand and job control scales with at least half of the items of the complete scales, and job strain indices based on one complete and one partial scale, seemed to assess the same underlying concepts as the complete survey instruments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3328260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33282602012-04-18 Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium Fransson, Eleonor I Nyberg, Solja T Heikkilä, Katriina Alfredsson, Lars Bacquer, De Dirk Batty, G David Bonenfant, Sébastien Casini, Annalisa Clays, Els Goldberg, Marcel Kittel, France Koskenvuo, Markku Knutsson, Anders Leineweber, Constanze Magnusson Hanson, Linda L Nordin, Maria Singh-Manoux, Archana Suominen, Sakari Vahtera, Jussi Westerholm, Peter Westerlund, Hugo Zins, Marie Theorell, Töres Kivimäki, Mika BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Job strain (i.e., high job demands combined with low job control) is a frequently used indicator of harmful work stress, but studies have often used partial versions of the complete multi-item job demands and control scales. Understanding whether the different instruments assess the same underlying concepts has crucial implications for the interpretation of findings across studies, harmonisation of multi-cohort data for pooled analyses, and design of future studies. As part of the 'IPD-Work' (Individual-participant-data meta-analysis in working populations) consortium, we compared different versions of the demands and control scales available in 17 European cohort studies. METHODS: Six of the 17 studies had information on the complete scales and 11 on partial scales. Here, we analyse individual level data from 70 751 participants of the studies which had complete scales (5 demand items, 6 job control items). RESULTS: We found high Pearson correlation coefficients between complete scales of job demands and control relative to scales with at least three items (r > 0.90) and for partial scales with two items only (r = 0.76-0.88). In comparison with scores from the complete scales, the agreement between job strain definitions was very good when only one item was missing in either the demands or the control scale (kappa > 0.80); good for job strain assessed with three demand items and all six control items (kappa > 0.68) and moderate to good when items were missing from both scales (kappa = 0.54-0.76). The sensitivity was > 0.80 when only one item was missing from either scale, decreasing when several items were missing in one or both job strain subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Partial job demand and job control scales with at least half of the items of the complete scales, and job strain indices based on one complete and one partial scale, seemed to assess the same underlying concepts as the complete survey instruments. BioMed Central 2012-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3328260/ /pubmed/22264402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-62 Text en Copyright ©2012 Fransson et al; BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fransson, Eleonor I Nyberg, Solja T Heikkilä, Katriina Alfredsson, Lars Bacquer, De Dirk Batty, G David Bonenfant, Sébastien Casini, Annalisa Clays, Els Goldberg, Marcel Kittel, France Koskenvuo, Markku Knutsson, Anders Leineweber, Constanze Magnusson Hanson, Linda L Nordin, Maria Singh-Manoux, Archana Suominen, Sakari Vahtera, Jussi Westerholm, Peter Westerlund, Hugo Zins, Marie Theorell, Töres Kivimäki, Mika Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium |
title | Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium |
title_full | Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium |
title_fullStr | Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium |
title_short | Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium |
title_sort | comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 european cohort studies: the ipd-work consortium |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3328260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22264402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-62 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franssoneleonori comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT nybergsoljat comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT heikkilakatriina comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT alfredssonlars comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT bacquerdedirk comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT battygdavid comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT bonenfantsebastien comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT casiniannalisa comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT claysels comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT goldbergmarcel comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT kittelfrance comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT koskenvuomarkku comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT knutssonanders comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT leineweberconstanze comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT magnussonhansonlindal comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT nordinmaria comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT singhmanouxarchana comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT suominensakari comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT vahterajussi comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT westerholmpeter comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT westerlundhugo comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT zinsmarie comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT theorelltores comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium AT kivimakimika comparisonofalternativeversionsofthejobdemandcontrolscalesin17europeancohortstudiestheipdworkconsortium |