Cargando…
Infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial
BACKGROUND: Whether the design of an anti-vacuum infant feeding bottle influences infant milk intake, growth or behavior is unknown, and was the subject of this randomized trial. METHODS: SUBJECTS: 63 (36 male) healthy, exclusively formula-fed term infants. INTERVENTION: Randomisation to use Bottle...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3328286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22424116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-150 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Whether the design of an anti-vacuum infant feeding bottle influences infant milk intake, growth or behavior is unknown, and was the subject of this randomized trial. METHODS: SUBJECTS: 63 (36 male) healthy, exclusively formula-fed term infants. INTERVENTION: Randomisation to use Bottle A (n = 31), one-way air valve: Philips Avent) versus Bottle B (n = 32), internal venting system: Dr Browns). 74 breast-fed reference infants were recruited, with randomisation (n = 24) to bottle A (n = 11) or B (n = 13) if bottle-feeding was subsequently introduced. RANDOMISATION: stratified by gender and parity; computer-based telephone randomisation by independent clinical trials unit. SETTING: Infant home. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: infant weight gain to 4 weeks. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: (i) milk intake (ii) infant behaviour measured at 2 weeks (validated 3-day diary); (iii) risk of infection; (iv) continuation of breastfeeding following introduction of mixed feeding. RESULTS: NUMBER ANALYSED FOR PRIMARY OUTCOME: Bottle A n = 29, Bottle B n = 25. PRIMARY OUTCOME: There was no significant difference in weight gain between randomised groups (0-4 weeks Bottle A 0.74 (SD 1.2) SDS versus bottle B 0.51 (0.39), mean difference 0.23 (95% CI -0.31 to 0.77). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Infants using bottle A had significantly less reported fussing (mean 46 versus 74 minutes/day, p < 0.05) than those using bottle B. There was no significant difference in any other outcome measure. BREAST-FED REFERENCE GROUP: There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between breast-fed and formula fed infants. The likelyhood of breastfeeding at 3 months was not significantly different in infants subsequently randomised to bottle A or B. CONCLUSION: Bottle design may have short-term effects on infant behaviour which merit further investigation. No significant effects were seen on milk intake or growth; confidence in these findings is limited by the small sample size and this needs confirmation in a larger study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT00325208. |
---|