Cargando…
Infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial
BACKGROUND: Whether the design of an anti-vacuum infant feeding bottle influences infant milk intake, growth or behavior is unknown, and was the subject of this randomized trial. METHODS: SUBJECTS: 63 (36 male) healthy, exclusively formula-fed term infants. INTERVENTION: Randomisation to use Bottle...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3328286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22424116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-150 |
_version_ | 1782229719865884672 |
---|---|
author | Fewtrell, MS Kennedy, K Nicholl, R Khakoo, A Lucas, A |
author_facet | Fewtrell, MS Kennedy, K Nicholl, R Khakoo, A Lucas, A |
author_sort | Fewtrell, MS |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Whether the design of an anti-vacuum infant feeding bottle influences infant milk intake, growth or behavior is unknown, and was the subject of this randomized trial. METHODS: SUBJECTS: 63 (36 male) healthy, exclusively formula-fed term infants. INTERVENTION: Randomisation to use Bottle A (n = 31), one-way air valve: Philips Avent) versus Bottle B (n = 32), internal venting system: Dr Browns). 74 breast-fed reference infants were recruited, with randomisation (n = 24) to bottle A (n = 11) or B (n = 13) if bottle-feeding was subsequently introduced. RANDOMISATION: stratified by gender and parity; computer-based telephone randomisation by independent clinical trials unit. SETTING: Infant home. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: infant weight gain to 4 weeks. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: (i) milk intake (ii) infant behaviour measured at 2 weeks (validated 3-day diary); (iii) risk of infection; (iv) continuation of breastfeeding following introduction of mixed feeding. RESULTS: NUMBER ANALYSED FOR PRIMARY OUTCOME: Bottle A n = 29, Bottle B n = 25. PRIMARY OUTCOME: There was no significant difference in weight gain between randomised groups (0-4 weeks Bottle A 0.74 (SD 1.2) SDS versus bottle B 0.51 (0.39), mean difference 0.23 (95% CI -0.31 to 0.77). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Infants using bottle A had significantly less reported fussing (mean 46 versus 74 minutes/day, p < 0.05) than those using bottle B. There was no significant difference in any other outcome measure. BREAST-FED REFERENCE GROUP: There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between breast-fed and formula fed infants. The likelyhood of breastfeeding at 3 months was not significantly different in infants subsequently randomised to bottle A or B. CONCLUSION: Bottle design may have short-term effects on infant behaviour which merit further investigation. No significant effects were seen on milk intake or growth; confidence in these findings is limited by the small sample size and this needs confirmation in a larger study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT00325208. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3328286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33282862012-04-18 Infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial Fewtrell, MS Kennedy, K Nicholl, R Khakoo, A Lucas, A BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Whether the design of an anti-vacuum infant feeding bottle influences infant milk intake, growth or behavior is unknown, and was the subject of this randomized trial. METHODS: SUBJECTS: 63 (36 male) healthy, exclusively formula-fed term infants. INTERVENTION: Randomisation to use Bottle A (n = 31), one-way air valve: Philips Avent) versus Bottle B (n = 32), internal venting system: Dr Browns). 74 breast-fed reference infants were recruited, with randomisation (n = 24) to bottle A (n = 11) or B (n = 13) if bottle-feeding was subsequently introduced. RANDOMISATION: stratified by gender and parity; computer-based telephone randomisation by independent clinical trials unit. SETTING: Infant home. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: infant weight gain to 4 weeks. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: (i) milk intake (ii) infant behaviour measured at 2 weeks (validated 3-day diary); (iii) risk of infection; (iv) continuation of breastfeeding following introduction of mixed feeding. RESULTS: NUMBER ANALYSED FOR PRIMARY OUTCOME: Bottle A n = 29, Bottle B n = 25. PRIMARY OUTCOME: There was no significant difference in weight gain between randomised groups (0-4 weeks Bottle A 0.74 (SD 1.2) SDS versus bottle B 0.51 (0.39), mean difference 0.23 (95% CI -0.31 to 0.77). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Infants using bottle A had significantly less reported fussing (mean 46 versus 74 minutes/day, p < 0.05) than those using bottle B. There was no significant difference in any other outcome measure. BREAST-FED REFERENCE GROUP: There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between breast-fed and formula fed infants. The likelyhood of breastfeeding at 3 months was not significantly different in infants subsequently randomised to bottle A or B. CONCLUSION: Bottle design may have short-term effects on infant behaviour which merit further investigation. No significant effects were seen on milk intake or growth; confidence in these findings is limited by the small sample size and this needs confirmation in a larger study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT00325208. BioMed Central 2012-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3328286/ /pubmed/22424116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-150 Text en Copyright ©2012 Fewtrell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fewtrell, MS Kennedy, K Nicholl, R Khakoo, A Lucas, A Infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial |
title | Infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial |
title_full | Infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial |
title_short | Infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial |
title_sort | infant feeding bottle design, growth and behaviour: results from a randomised trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3328286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22424116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fewtrellms infantfeedingbottledesigngrowthandbehaviourresultsfromarandomisedtrial AT kennedyk infantfeedingbottledesigngrowthandbehaviourresultsfromarandomisedtrial AT nichollr infantfeedingbottledesigngrowthandbehaviourresultsfromarandomisedtrial AT khakooa infantfeedingbottledesigngrowthandbehaviourresultsfromarandomisedtrial AT lucasa infantfeedingbottledesigngrowthandbehaviourresultsfromarandomisedtrial |