Cargando…

Respective Prognostic Value of Genomic Grade and Histological Proliferation Markers in Early Stage (pN0) Breast Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Genomic grade (GG) is a 97-gene signature which improves the accuracy and prognostic value of histological grade (HG) in invasive breast carcinoma. Since most of the genes included in the GG are involved in cell proliferation, we performed a retrospective study to compare the prognostic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reyal, Fabien, Bollet, Marc A., Caly, Martial, Gentien, David, Carpentier, Sabrina, Peyro-Saint-Paul, Hélène, Pierga, Jean-Yves, Cottu, Paul, Dieras, Véronique, Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte, Vincent-Salomon, Anne, Sastre-Garau, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3329444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22529987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035184
_version_ 1782229841239605248
author Reyal, Fabien
Bollet, Marc A.
Caly, Martial
Gentien, David
Carpentier, Sabrina
Peyro-Saint-Paul, Hélène
Pierga, Jean-Yves
Cottu, Paul
Dieras, Véronique
Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte
Vincent-Salomon, Anne
Sastre-Garau, Xavier
author_facet Reyal, Fabien
Bollet, Marc A.
Caly, Martial
Gentien, David
Carpentier, Sabrina
Peyro-Saint-Paul, Hélène
Pierga, Jean-Yves
Cottu, Paul
Dieras, Véronique
Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte
Vincent-Salomon, Anne
Sastre-Garau, Xavier
author_sort Reyal, Fabien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genomic grade (GG) is a 97-gene signature which improves the accuracy and prognostic value of histological grade (HG) in invasive breast carcinoma. Since most of the genes included in the GG are involved in cell proliferation, we performed a retrospective study to compare the prognostic value of GG, Mitotic Index and Ki67 score. METHODS: A series of 163 consecutive breast cancers was retained (pT1–2, pN0, pM0, 10-yr follow-up). GG was computed using MapQuant Dx(R). RESULTS: GG was low (GG-1) in 48%, high (GG-3) in 31% and equivocal in 21% of cases. For HG-2 tumors, 50% were classified as GG-1, 18% as GG-3 whereas 31% remained equivocal. In a subgroup of 132 ER+/HER2− tumors GG was the most significant prognostic factor in multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and tumor size (HR = 5.23, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a reference comprehensive cancer center setting, compared to histological grade, GG added significant information on cell proliferation in breast cancers. In patients with HG-2 carcinoma, applying the GG to guide the treatment scheme could lead to a reduction in adjuvant therapy prescription. However, based on the results observed and considering (i) the relatively close prognostic values of GG and Ki67, (ii) the reclassification of about 30% of HG-2 tumors as Equivocal GG and (iii) the economical and technical requirements of the MapQuant micro-array GG test, the availability in the near future of a PCR-based Genomic Grade test with improved performances may lead to an introduction in clinical routine of this test for histological grade 2, ER positive, HER2 negative breast carcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3329444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33294442012-04-23 Respective Prognostic Value of Genomic Grade and Histological Proliferation Markers in Early Stage (pN0) Breast Carcinoma Reyal, Fabien Bollet, Marc A. Caly, Martial Gentien, David Carpentier, Sabrina Peyro-Saint-Paul, Hélène Pierga, Jean-Yves Cottu, Paul Dieras, Véronique Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte Vincent-Salomon, Anne Sastre-Garau, Xavier PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomic grade (GG) is a 97-gene signature which improves the accuracy and prognostic value of histological grade (HG) in invasive breast carcinoma. Since most of the genes included in the GG are involved in cell proliferation, we performed a retrospective study to compare the prognostic value of GG, Mitotic Index and Ki67 score. METHODS: A series of 163 consecutive breast cancers was retained (pT1–2, pN0, pM0, 10-yr follow-up). GG was computed using MapQuant Dx(R). RESULTS: GG was low (GG-1) in 48%, high (GG-3) in 31% and equivocal in 21% of cases. For HG-2 tumors, 50% were classified as GG-1, 18% as GG-3 whereas 31% remained equivocal. In a subgroup of 132 ER+/HER2− tumors GG was the most significant prognostic factor in multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and tumor size (HR = 5.23, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a reference comprehensive cancer center setting, compared to histological grade, GG added significant information on cell proliferation in breast cancers. In patients with HG-2 carcinoma, applying the GG to guide the treatment scheme could lead to a reduction in adjuvant therapy prescription. However, based on the results observed and considering (i) the relatively close prognostic values of GG and Ki67, (ii) the reclassification of about 30% of HG-2 tumors as Equivocal GG and (iii) the economical and technical requirements of the MapQuant micro-array GG test, the availability in the near future of a PCR-based Genomic Grade test with improved performances may lead to an introduction in clinical routine of this test for histological grade 2, ER positive, HER2 negative breast carcinoma. Public Library of Science 2012-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3329444/ /pubmed/22529987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035184 Text en Reyal et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reyal, Fabien
Bollet, Marc A.
Caly, Martial
Gentien, David
Carpentier, Sabrina
Peyro-Saint-Paul, Hélène
Pierga, Jean-Yves
Cottu, Paul
Dieras, Véronique
Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte
Vincent-Salomon, Anne
Sastre-Garau, Xavier
Respective Prognostic Value of Genomic Grade and Histological Proliferation Markers in Early Stage (pN0) Breast Carcinoma
title Respective Prognostic Value of Genomic Grade and Histological Proliferation Markers in Early Stage (pN0) Breast Carcinoma
title_full Respective Prognostic Value of Genomic Grade and Histological Proliferation Markers in Early Stage (pN0) Breast Carcinoma
title_fullStr Respective Prognostic Value of Genomic Grade and Histological Proliferation Markers in Early Stage (pN0) Breast Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Respective Prognostic Value of Genomic Grade and Histological Proliferation Markers in Early Stage (pN0) Breast Carcinoma
title_short Respective Prognostic Value of Genomic Grade and Histological Proliferation Markers in Early Stage (pN0) Breast Carcinoma
title_sort respective prognostic value of genomic grade and histological proliferation markers in early stage (pn0) breast carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3329444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22529987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035184
work_keys_str_mv AT reyalfabien respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT bolletmarca respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT calymartial respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT gentiendavid respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT carpentiersabrina respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT peyrosaintpaulhelene respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT piergajeanyves respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT cottupaul respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT dierasveronique respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT sigalzafranibrigitte respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT vincentsalomonanne respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma
AT sastregarauxavier respectiveprognosticvalueofgenomicgradeandhistologicalproliferationmarkersinearlystagepn0breastcarcinoma