Cargando…

Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts

OBJECTIVES: To understand organisational technology adoption (initiation, adoption decision, implementation) by looking at the different types of innovation knowledge used during this process. DESIGN: Qualitative, multisite, comparative case study design. SETTING: One primary care and 11 acute care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kyratsis, Yiannis, Ahmad, Raheelah, Holmes, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3329608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22492183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000872
_version_ 1782229867684691968
author Kyratsis, Yiannis
Ahmad, Raheelah
Holmes, Alison
author_facet Kyratsis, Yiannis
Ahmad, Raheelah
Holmes, Alison
author_sort Kyratsis, Yiannis
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To understand organisational technology adoption (initiation, adoption decision, implementation) by looking at the different types of innovation knowledge used during this process. DESIGN: Qualitative, multisite, comparative case study design. SETTING: One primary care and 11 acute care organisations (trusts) across all health regions in England in the context of infection prevention and control. PARTICIPANTS AND DATA ANALYSIS: 121 semistructured individual and group interviews with 109 informants, involving clinical and non-clinical staff from all organisational levels and various professional groups. Documentary evidence and field notes were also used. 38 technology adoption processes were analysed using an integrated approach combining inductive and deductive reasoning. MAIN FINDINGS: Those involved in the process variably accessed three types of innovation knowledge: ‘awareness’ (information that an innovation exists), ‘principles’ (information about an innovation's functioning principles) and ‘how-to’ (information required to use an innovation properly at individual and organisational levels). Centralised (national, government-led) and local sources were used to obtain this knowledge. Localised professional networks were preferred sources for all three types of knowledge. Professional backgrounds influenced an asymmetric attention to different types of innovation knowledge. When less attention was given to ‘how-to’ compared with ‘principles’ knowledge at the early stages of the process, this contributed to 12 cases of incomplete implementation or discontinuance after initial adoption. CONCLUSIONS: Potential adopters and change agents often overlooked or undervalued ‘how-to’ knowledge. Balancing ‘principles’ and ‘how-to’ knowledge early in the innovation process enhanced successful technology adoption and implementation by considering efficacy as well as strategic, structural and cultural fit with the organisation's context. This learning is critical given the policy emphasis for health organisations to be innovation-ready.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3329608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33296082012-04-23 Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts Kyratsis, Yiannis Ahmad, Raheelah Holmes, Alison BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To understand organisational technology adoption (initiation, adoption decision, implementation) by looking at the different types of innovation knowledge used during this process. DESIGN: Qualitative, multisite, comparative case study design. SETTING: One primary care and 11 acute care organisations (trusts) across all health regions in England in the context of infection prevention and control. PARTICIPANTS AND DATA ANALYSIS: 121 semistructured individual and group interviews with 109 informants, involving clinical and non-clinical staff from all organisational levels and various professional groups. Documentary evidence and field notes were also used. 38 technology adoption processes were analysed using an integrated approach combining inductive and deductive reasoning. MAIN FINDINGS: Those involved in the process variably accessed three types of innovation knowledge: ‘awareness’ (information that an innovation exists), ‘principles’ (information about an innovation's functioning principles) and ‘how-to’ (information required to use an innovation properly at individual and organisational levels). Centralised (national, government-led) and local sources were used to obtain this knowledge. Localised professional networks were preferred sources for all three types of knowledge. Professional backgrounds influenced an asymmetric attention to different types of innovation knowledge. When less attention was given to ‘how-to’ compared with ‘principles’ knowledge at the early stages of the process, this contributed to 12 cases of incomplete implementation or discontinuance after initial adoption. CONCLUSIONS: Potential adopters and change agents often overlooked or undervalued ‘how-to’ knowledge. Balancing ‘principles’ and ‘how-to’ knowledge early in the innovation process enhanced successful technology adoption and implementation by considering efficacy as well as strategic, structural and cultural fit with the organisation's context. This learning is critical given the policy emphasis for health organisations to be innovation-ready. BMJ Group 2012-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3329608/ /pubmed/22492183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000872 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Kyratsis, Yiannis
Ahmad, Raheelah
Holmes, Alison
Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts
title Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts
title_full Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts
title_fullStr Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts
title_full_unstemmed Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts
title_short Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts
title_sort technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 english nhs trusts
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3329608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22492183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000872
work_keys_str_mv AT kyratsisyiannis technologyadoptionandimplementationinorganisationscomparativecasestudiesof12englishnhstrusts
AT ahmadraheelah technologyadoptionandimplementationinorganisationscomparativecasestudiesof12englishnhstrusts
AT holmesalison technologyadoptionandimplementationinorganisationscomparativecasestudiesof12englishnhstrusts