Cargando…

Gnathic osteosarcomas: Review of literature and report of two cases in maxilla

Primary neoplasms of the skeleton are rare, accounting for 0.2% of overall human tumor burden. Osteosarcoma (OS) accounts for 15–35% of all primary bone tumors, while gnathic osteosarcomas (GOS) represent 4–8% of all osteosarcomas. GOS shows a predilection for men, a peak incidence of 33 years, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, Antony, Mani, Varghese
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3329700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22529570
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.84476
_version_ 1782229884162015232
author George, Antony
Mani, Varghese
author_facet George, Antony
Mani, Varghese
author_sort George, Antony
collection PubMed
description Primary neoplasms of the skeleton are rare, accounting for 0.2% of overall human tumor burden. Osteosarcoma (OS) accounts for 15–35% of all primary bone tumors, while gnathic osteosarcomas (GOS) represent 4–8% of all osteosarcomas. GOS shows a predilection for men, a peak incidence of 33 years, and affects the mandible more than the maxilla. We review the scientific literature for a better understanding of the clinical, radiographic, and histopathological features of GOS, along with its etiology, staging, treatment protocol, prognosis, and survival. Evidence from molecular research suggests that it is a differentiation disease that disrupts osteoblasts differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells. The classical radiographic finding of a “sunburst” appearance is appreciated only in 50% of GOS. The universally accepted staging system is not commonly used due to the rarity with which they metastasize to the regional lymph nodes. A number of distinct histopathological subtypes have been described, of which osteoblastic GOS are most common. The treatment protocol is multimodal consisting of preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery and postoperative chemotherapy, and has a 60-70% five-year survival rate. We present two case reports of osteosarcoma involving the maxillary that were initially misdiagnosed as peripheral giant cell granuloma and osteoma of the maxilla, respectively. These case reports demonstrate the diverse clinical, radiographic, and histopathological features that can be encountered in GOS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3329700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33297002012-04-23 Gnathic osteosarcomas: Review of literature and report of two cases in maxilla George, Antony Mani, Varghese J Oral Maxillofac Pathol Review Article Primary neoplasms of the skeleton are rare, accounting for 0.2% of overall human tumor burden. Osteosarcoma (OS) accounts for 15–35% of all primary bone tumors, while gnathic osteosarcomas (GOS) represent 4–8% of all osteosarcomas. GOS shows a predilection for men, a peak incidence of 33 years, and affects the mandible more than the maxilla. We review the scientific literature for a better understanding of the clinical, radiographic, and histopathological features of GOS, along with its etiology, staging, treatment protocol, prognosis, and survival. Evidence from molecular research suggests that it is a differentiation disease that disrupts osteoblasts differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells. The classical radiographic finding of a “sunburst” appearance is appreciated only in 50% of GOS. The universally accepted staging system is not commonly used due to the rarity with which they metastasize to the regional lymph nodes. A number of distinct histopathological subtypes have been described, of which osteoblastic GOS are most common. The treatment protocol is multimodal consisting of preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery and postoperative chemotherapy, and has a 60-70% five-year survival rate. We present two case reports of osteosarcoma involving the maxillary that were initially misdiagnosed as peripheral giant cell granuloma and osteoma of the maxilla, respectively. These case reports demonstrate the diverse clinical, radiographic, and histopathological features that can be encountered in GOS. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3329700/ /pubmed/22529570 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.84476 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
George, Antony
Mani, Varghese
Gnathic osteosarcomas: Review of literature and report of two cases in maxilla
title Gnathic osteosarcomas: Review of literature and report of two cases in maxilla
title_full Gnathic osteosarcomas: Review of literature and report of two cases in maxilla
title_fullStr Gnathic osteosarcomas: Review of literature and report of two cases in maxilla
title_full_unstemmed Gnathic osteosarcomas: Review of literature and report of two cases in maxilla
title_short Gnathic osteosarcomas: Review of literature and report of two cases in maxilla
title_sort gnathic osteosarcomas: review of literature and report of two cases in maxilla
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3329700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22529570
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.84476
work_keys_str_mv AT georgeantony gnathicosteosarcomasreviewofliteratureandreportoftwocasesinmaxilla
AT manivarghese gnathicosteosarcomasreviewofliteratureandreportoftwocasesinmaxilla