Cargando…

Determinants of condom uptake among HIV voluntary counselling and testing clients: experiences from a hospital-based study in south India

BACKGROUND: HIV voluntary counselling and testing was a key HIV prevention strategy brought to scale by India's National AIDS Control Organization. Condom uptake is an essential metric of intervention impact given the expansion of the epidemic into an increasingly diverse population. With only...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myerson, Rebecca, Makela, Susanna M, Chandrasekhar, C, Mathew, Siju, Chakraborty, Sourabh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3330007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22236357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-13
_version_ 1782229914071597056
author Myerson, Rebecca
Makela, Susanna M
Chandrasekhar, C
Mathew, Siju
Chakraborty, Sourabh
author_facet Myerson, Rebecca
Makela, Susanna M
Chandrasekhar, C
Mathew, Siju
Chakraborty, Sourabh
author_sort Myerson, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HIV voluntary counselling and testing was a key HIV prevention strategy brought to scale by India's National AIDS Control Organization. Condom uptake is an essential metric of intervention impact given the expansion of the epidemic into an increasingly diverse population. With only 20% of first-time counselling and testing clients at the largest HIV treatment hospital in south India reporting previous condom use, the question of intervention impact on condom use deserves investigation. In this study, we track intervention impact across various demographic groups and identify the added value of more thorough counselling. METHODS: Data were collected from 8,865 individuals who attended counselling multiple times at the Tamil Nadu Government Hospital of Thoracic Medicine over the years 2004-2009. Counsellors recorded client demographic characteristics, HIV risk behaviours reported, and counselling services provided after each counselling session. Matching and regression methods were used to determine the probability of condom uptake by serostatus, gender, and receipt of personalized risk reduction counselling while controlling for other characteristics. RESULTS: HIV counselling and testing was associated with condom uptake among 29.2% of HIV positive women (CI 24.5-34.4%), 31.7% of HIV positive men (CI 27.8-35.4%), 15.5% of HIV negative women (CI 11.2-20.8%), and only 3.6% of HIV negative men (CI 1.9-5.9%) who had previously never used condoms. Personalized risk reduction counselling increased impact in some groups; for example an additional 18% of HIV negative women (CI 11.3-24.4%) and 17% of HIV positive men (CI 10.9-23.4%) started using condoms. The number of sexual partners was not associated with the impact of counselling completeness. CONCLUSIONS: Because the components of testing and counselling impact the condom use habits of men and women differently, understanding the dynamics of condom use negotiation between partners is essential to optimizing impact on Indian couples. Clients' predicted condom uptake ranged between 4% and 47% depending on factors like gender, serostatus, and services provided. Personalized risk reduction counselling is associated with increased chance of condom use, with larger gains in HIV negative women and HIV positive men. HIV negative men are least likely to start using condoms and least impacted by additional counselling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3330007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33300072012-04-20 Determinants of condom uptake among HIV voluntary counselling and testing clients: experiences from a hospital-based study in south India Myerson, Rebecca Makela, Susanna M Chandrasekhar, C Mathew, Siju Chakraborty, Sourabh BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: HIV voluntary counselling and testing was a key HIV prevention strategy brought to scale by India's National AIDS Control Organization. Condom uptake is an essential metric of intervention impact given the expansion of the epidemic into an increasingly diverse population. With only 20% of first-time counselling and testing clients at the largest HIV treatment hospital in south India reporting previous condom use, the question of intervention impact on condom use deserves investigation. In this study, we track intervention impact across various demographic groups and identify the added value of more thorough counselling. METHODS: Data were collected from 8,865 individuals who attended counselling multiple times at the Tamil Nadu Government Hospital of Thoracic Medicine over the years 2004-2009. Counsellors recorded client demographic characteristics, HIV risk behaviours reported, and counselling services provided after each counselling session. Matching and regression methods were used to determine the probability of condom uptake by serostatus, gender, and receipt of personalized risk reduction counselling while controlling for other characteristics. RESULTS: HIV counselling and testing was associated with condom uptake among 29.2% of HIV positive women (CI 24.5-34.4%), 31.7% of HIV positive men (CI 27.8-35.4%), 15.5% of HIV negative women (CI 11.2-20.8%), and only 3.6% of HIV negative men (CI 1.9-5.9%) who had previously never used condoms. Personalized risk reduction counselling increased impact in some groups; for example an additional 18% of HIV negative women (CI 11.3-24.4%) and 17% of HIV positive men (CI 10.9-23.4%) started using condoms. The number of sexual partners was not associated with the impact of counselling completeness. CONCLUSIONS: Because the components of testing and counselling impact the condom use habits of men and women differently, understanding the dynamics of condom use negotiation between partners is essential to optimizing impact on Indian couples. Clients' predicted condom uptake ranged between 4% and 47% depending on factors like gender, serostatus, and services provided. Personalized risk reduction counselling is associated with increased chance of condom use, with larger gains in HIV negative women and HIV positive men. HIV negative men are least likely to start using condoms and least impacted by additional counselling. BioMed Central 2012-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3330007/ /pubmed/22236357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-13 Text en Copyright ©2012 Myerson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Myerson, Rebecca
Makela, Susanna M
Chandrasekhar, C
Mathew, Siju
Chakraborty, Sourabh
Determinants of condom uptake among HIV voluntary counselling and testing clients: experiences from a hospital-based study in south India
title Determinants of condom uptake among HIV voluntary counselling and testing clients: experiences from a hospital-based study in south India
title_full Determinants of condom uptake among HIV voluntary counselling and testing clients: experiences from a hospital-based study in south India
title_fullStr Determinants of condom uptake among HIV voluntary counselling and testing clients: experiences from a hospital-based study in south India
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of condom uptake among HIV voluntary counselling and testing clients: experiences from a hospital-based study in south India
title_short Determinants of condom uptake among HIV voluntary counselling and testing clients: experiences from a hospital-based study in south India
title_sort determinants of condom uptake among hiv voluntary counselling and testing clients: experiences from a hospital-based study in south india
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3330007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22236357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-13
work_keys_str_mv AT myersonrebecca determinantsofcondomuptakeamonghivvoluntarycounsellingandtestingclientsexperiencesfromahospitalbasedstudyinsouthindia
AT makelasusannam determinantsofcondomuptakeamonghivvoluntarycounsellingandtestingclientsexperiencesfromahospitalbasedstudyinsouthindia
AT chandrasekharc determinantsofcondomuptakeamonghivvoluntarycounsellingandtestingclientsexperiencesfromahospitalbasedstudyinsouthindia
AT mathewsiju determinantsofcondomuptakeamonghivvoluntarycounsellingandtestingclientsexperiencesfromahospitalbasedstudyinsouthindia
AT chakrabortysourabh determinantsofcondomuptakeamonghivvoluntarycounsellingandtestingclientsexperiencesfromahospitalbasedstudyinsouthindia