Cargando…

The Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-Being Instrument – Psychometric Evaluation

BACKGROUND: There is a need for instruments combining measurements of symptom distress and well-being in the organ transplant population. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of a measure of symptoms and well-being in organ transplant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forsberg, Anna, Persson, Lars-Olof, Nilsson, Madeleine, Lennerling, Annette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3330362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22523527
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874434601206010030
_version_ 1782229951670386688
author Forsberg, Anna
Persson, Lars-Olof
Nilsson, Madeleine
Lennerling, Annette
author_facet Forsberg, Anna
Persson, Lars-Olof
Nilsson, Madeleine
Lennerling, Annette
author_sort Forsberg, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need for instruments combining measurements of symptom distress and well-being in the organ transplant population. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of a measure of symptoms and well-being in organ transplant recipients labelled the Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-being instrument (OTSWI) and to provide descriptive data on these matters. METHOD: In this cross sectional survey, the study sample (n=185) completed several measures including demographic information, the Short form- 36 items (SF-36), and the OTSWI to assess concurrent validity by exploring relationships between OTSWI and measures of health related quality of life (HRQOL). The expected scale dimensionality of the OTSWI questionnaire was examined both by the confirmatory multi-trait analysis program and by explorative principal component analysis (with oblique, varimax rotation). Scale reliability was further estimated using the Cronbach’s alpha. RESULTS: There were eight factors built up from twenty of the initial fifty one items and were labelled fatigue, joint and muscle pain, cognitive functioning, basic activities in daily life, sleeping problems, mood, foot pain and economy. For the remaining twenty-one items no consistent and meaningful factors could be found leading to relevant symptoms acting as single items. All eight factors had satisfying internal convergent validity as well as good item-scale discriminatory validity or ‘success rate’. DISCUSSION: Results support the internal consistency, reliability and concurrent validity of the OTSWI as an instrument to measure symptom distress and well-being in relation to organ transplantation. (Word count 244).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3330362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33303622012-04-20 The Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-Being Instrument – Psychometric Evaluation Forsberg, Anna Persson, Lars-Olof Nilsson, Madeleine Lennerling, Annette Open Nurs J Article BACKGROUND: There is a need for instruments combining measurements of symptom distress and well-being in the organ transplant population. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of a measure of symptoms and well-being in organ transplant recipients labelled the Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-being instrument (OTSWI) and to provide descriptive data on these matters. METHOD: In this cross sectional survey, the study sample (n=185) completed several measures including demographic information, the Short form- 36 items (SF-36), and the OTSWI to assess concurrent validity by exploring relationships between OTSWI and measures of health related quality of life (HRQOL). The expected scale dimensionality of the OTSWI questionnaire was examined both by the confirmatory multi-trait analysis program and by explorative principal component analysis (with oblique, varimax rotation). Scale reliability was further estimated using the Cronbach’s alpha. RESULTS: There were eight factors built up from twenty of the initial fifty one items and were labelled fatigue, joint and muscle pain, cognitive functioning, basic activities in daily life, sleeping problems, mood, foot pain and economy. For the remaining twenty-one items no consistent and meaningful factors could be found leading to relevant symptoms acting as single items. All eight factors had satisfying internal convergent validity as well as good item-scale discriminatory validity or ‘success rate’. DISCUSSION: Results support the internal consistency, reliability and concurrent validity of the OTSWI as an instrument to measure symptom distress and well-being in relation to organ transplantation. (Word count 244). Bentham Open 2012-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3330362/ /pubmed/22523527 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874434601206010030 Text en © Forsberg et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Forsberg, Anna
Persson, Lars-Olof
Nilsson, Madeleine
Lennerling, Annette
The Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-Being Instrument – Psychometric Evaluation
title The Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-Being Instrument – Psychometric Evaluation
title_full The Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-Being Instrument – Psychometric Evaluation
title_fullStr The Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-Being Instrument – Psychometric Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-Being Instrument – Psychometric Evaluation
title_short The Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-Being Instrument – Psychometric Evaluation
title_sort organ transplant symptom and well-being instrument – psychometric evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3330362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22523527
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874434601206010030
work_keys_str_mv AT forsberganna theorgantransplantsymptomandwellbeinginstrumentpsychometricevaluation
AT perssonlarsolof theorgantransplantsymptomandwellbeinginstrumentpsychometricevaluation
AT nilssonmadeleine theorgantransplantsymptomandwellbeinginstrumentpsychometricevaluation
AT lennerlingannette theorgantransplantsymptomandwellbeinginstrumentpsychometricevaluation
AT forsberganna organtransplantsymptomandwellbeinginstrumentpsychometricevaluation
AT perssonlarsolof organtransplantsymptomandwellbeinginstrumentpsychometricevaluation
AT nilssonmadeleine organtransplantsymptomandwellbeinginstrumentpsychometricevaluation
AT lennerlingannette organtransplantsymptomandwellbeinginstrumentpsychometricevaluation