Cargando…
Comparing United States and Canadian population exposures from National Biomonitoring Surveys: Bisphenol A intake as a case study
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provides biomonitoring data in the United States as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Recently, Statistics Canada initiated a similar survey — the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS). Comparison of US and Canadian...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3331622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22333730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.1 |
_version_ | 1782230132616855552 |
---|---|
author | LaKind, Judy S Levesque, Johanne Dumas, Pierre Bryan, Shirley Clarke, Janine Naiman, Daniel Q |
author_facet | LaKind, Judy S Levesque, Johanne Dumas, Pierre Bryan, Shirley Clarke, Janine Naiman, Daniel Q |
author_sort | LaKind, Judy S |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provides biomonitoring data in the United States as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Recently, Statistics Canada initiated a similar survey — the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS). Comparison of US and Canadian biomonitoring data can generate hypotheses regarding human exposures from environmental media and consumer products. To ensure that such comparisons are scientifically meaningful, it is essential to first evaluate aspects of the surveys' methods that can impact comparability of data. We examined CHMS and NHANES methodologies, using bisphenol A (BPA) as a case study, to evaluate whether survey differences exist that would hinder our ability to compare chemical concentrations between countries. We explored methods associated with participant selection, urine sampling, and analytical methods. BPA intakes were also estimated to address body weight differences between countries. Differences in survey methods were identified but are unlikely to have substantial impacts on inter-survey comparisons of BPA intakes. BPA intakes for both countries are below health-based guidance values set by the US, Canada and the European Food Safety Authority. We recommend that before comparing biomonitoring data between surveys, a thorough review of methodologic aspects that might impact biomonitoring results be conducted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3331622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33316222012-04-20 Comparing United States and Canadian population exposures from National Biomonitoring Surveys: Bisphenol A intake as a case study LaKind, Judy S Levesque, Johanne Dumas, Pierre Bryan, Shirley Clarke, Janine Naiman, Daniel Q J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Original Article The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provides biomonitoring data in the United States as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Recently, Statistics Canada initiated a similar survey — the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS). Comparison of US and Canadian biomonitoring data can generate hypotheses regarding human exposures from environmental media and consumer products. To ensure that such comparisons are scientifically meaningful, it is essential to first evaluate aspects of the surveys' methods that can impact comparability of data. We examined CHMS and NHANES methodologies, using bisphenol A (BPA) as a case study, to evaluate whether survey differences exist that would hinder our ability to compare chemical concentrations between countries. We explored methods associated with participant selection, urine sampling, and analytical methods. BPA intakes were also estimated to address body weight differences between countries. Differences in survey methods were identified but are unlikely to have substantial impacts on inter-survey comparisons of BPA intakes. BPA intakes for both countries are below health-based guidance values set by the US, Canada and the European Food Safety Authority. We recommend that before comparing biomonitoring data between surveys, a thorough review of methodologic aspects that might impact biomonitoring results be conducted. Nature Publishing Group 2012-05 2012-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3331622/ /pubmed/22333730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.1 Text en Copyright © 2012 Nature America, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article LaKind, Judy S Levesque, Johanne Dumas, Pierre Bryan, Shirley Clarke, Janine Naiman, Daniel Q Comparing United States and Canadian population exposures from National Biomonitoring Surveys: Bisphenol A intake as a case study |
title | Comparing United States and Canadian population exposures from National Biomonitoring Surveys: Bisphenol A intake as a case study |
title_full | Comparing United States and Canadian population exposures from National Biomonitoring Surveys: Bisphenol A intake as a case study |
title_fullStr | Comparing United States and Canadian population exposures from National Biomonitoring Surveys: Bisphenol A intake as a case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing United States and Canadian population exposures from National Biomonitoring Surveys: Bisphenol A intake as a case study |
title_short | Comparing United States and Canadian population exposures from National Biomonitoring Surveys: Bisphenol A intake as a case study |
title_sort | comparing united states and canadian population exposures from national biomonitoring surveys: bisphenol a intake as a case study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3331622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22333730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lakindjudys comparingunitedstatesandcanadianpopulationexposuresfromnationalbiomonitoringsurveysbisphenolaintakeasacasestudy AT levesquejohanne comparingunitedstatesandcanadianpopulationexposuresfromnationalbiomonitoringsurveysbisphenolaintakeasacasestudy AT dumaspierre comparingunitedstatesandcanadianpopulationexposuresfromnationalbiomonitoringsurveysbisphenolaintakeasacasestudy AT bryanshirley comparingunitedstatesandcanadianpopulationexposuresfromnationalbiomonitoringsurveysbisphenolaintakeasacasestudy AT clarkejanine comparingunitedstatesandcanadianpopulationexposuresfromnationalbiomonitoringsurveysbisphenolaintakeasacasestudy AT naimandanielq comparingunitedstatesandcanadianpopulationexposuresfromnationalbiomonitoringsurveysbisphenolaintakeasacasestudy |