Cargando…

Adoption and use of social media among public health departments

BACKGROUND: Effective communication is a critical function within any public health system. Social media has enhanced communication between individuals and organizations and has the potential to augment public health communication. However, there is a lack of reported data on social media adoption w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thackeray, Rosemary, Neiger, Brad L, Smith, Amanda K, Van Wagenen, Sarah B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3331826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22449137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-242
_version_ 1782230150213009408
author Thackeray, Rosemary
Neiger, Brad L
Smith, Amanda K
Van Wagenen, Sarah B
author_facet Thackeray, Rosemary
Neiger, Brad L
Smith, Amanda K
Van Wagenen, Sarah B
author_sort Thackeray, Rosemary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective communication is a critical function within any public health system. Social media has enhanced communication between individuals and organizations and has the potential to augment public health communication. However, there is a lack of reported data on social media adoption within public health settings. The purposes of this study were to assess: 1) the extent to which state public health departments (SHDs) are using social media; 2) which social media applications are used most often; and 3) how often social media is used interactively to engage audiences. METHODS: This was a non-experimental, cross sectional study of SHD social media sites. Screen capture software Snag-It(® )was used to obtain screenshots of SHD social media sites across five applications. These sites were coded for social media presence, interactivity, reach, and topic. RESULTS: Sixty percent of SHDs reported using at least one social media application. Of these, 86.7% had a Twitter account, 56% a Facebook account, and 43% a YouTube channel. There was a statistically significant difference between average population density and use of social media (p = .01). On average, SHDs made one post per day on social media sites, and this was primarily to distribute information; there was very little interaction with audiences. SHDs have few followers or friends on their social media sites. The most common topics for posts and tweets related to staying healthy and diseases and conditions. Limitations include the absence of a standard by which social media metrics measure presence, reach, or interactivity; SHDs were only included if they had an institutionally maintained account; and the study was cross sectional. CONCLUSIONS: Social media use by public health agencies is in the early adoption stage. However, the reach of social media is limited. SHDs are using social media as a channel to distribute information rather than capitalizing on the interactivity available to create conversations and engage with the audience. If public health agencies are to effectively use social media then they must develop a strategic communication plan that incorporates best practices for expanding reach and fostering interactivity and engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3331826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33318262012-04-21 Adoption and use of social media among public health departments Thackeray, Rosemary Neiger, Brad L Smith, Amanda K Van Wagenen, Sarah B BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Effective communication is a critical function within any public health system. Social media has enhanced communication between individuals and organizations and has the potential to augment public health communication. However, there is a lack of reported data on social media adoption within public health settings. The purposes of this study were to assess: 1) the extent to which state public health departments (SHDs) are using social media; 2) which social media applications are used most often; and 3) how often social media is used interactively to engage audiences. METHODS: This was a non-experimental, cross sectional study of SHD social media sites. Screen capture software Snag-It(® )was used to obtain screenshots of SHD social media sites across five applications. These sites were coded for social media presence, interactivity, reach, and topic. RESULTS: Sixty percent of SHDs reported using at least one social media application. Of these, 86.7% had a Twitter account, 56% a Facebook account, and 43% a YouTube channel. There was a statistically significant difference between average population density and use of social media (p = .01). On average, SHDs made one post per day on social media sites, and this was primarily to distribute information; there was very little interaction with audiences. SHDs have few followers or friends on their social media sites. The most common topics for posts and tweets related to staying healthy and diseases and conditions. Limitations include the absence of a standard by which social media metrics measure presence, reach, or interactivity; SHDs were only included if they had an institutionally maintained account; and the study was cross sectional. CONCLUSIONS: Social media use by public health agencies is in the early adoption stage. However, the reach of social media is limited. SHDs are using social media as a channel to distribute information rather than capitalizing on the interactivity available to create conversations and engage with the audience. If public health agencies are to effectively use social media then they must develop a strategic communication plan that incorporates best practices for expanding reach and fostering interactivity and engagement. BioMed Central 2012-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3331826/ /pubmed/22449137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-242 Text en Copyright ©2012 Thackeray et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thackeray, Rosemary
Neiger, Brad L
Smith, Amanda K
Van Wagenen, Sarah B
Adoption and use of social media among public health departments
title Adoption and use of social media among public health departments
title_full Adoption and use of social media among public health departments
title_fullStr Adoption and use of social media among public health departments
title_full_unstemmed Adoption and use of social media among public health departments
title_short Adoption and use of social media among public health departments
title_sort adoption and use of social media among public health departments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3331826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22449137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-242
work_keys_str_mv AT thackerayrosemary adoptionanduseofsocialmediaamongpublichealthdepartments
AT neigerbradl adoptionanduseofsocialmediaamongpublichealthdepartments
AT smithamandak adoptionanduseofsocialmediaamongpublichealthdepartments
AT vanwagenensarahb adoptionanduseofsocialmediaamongpublichealthdepartments