Cargando…
Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience
BACKGROUND: We wanted to test the reliability of a commonly used classification of distal radius fractures in children. METHODS: 105 consecutive fractures of the distal radius in children were rated on two occasions three months apart by 3 groups of doctors; 4 junior registrars, 4 senior registrars...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3331853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22269925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-6 |
_version_ | 1782230156358713344 |
---|---|
author | Randsborg, Per-Henrik Sivertsen, Einar A |
author_facet | Randsborg, Per-Henrik Sivertsen, Einar A |
author_sort | Randsborg, Per-Henrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We wanted to test the reliability of a commonly used classification of distal radius fractures in children. METHODS: 105 consecutive fractures of the distal radius in children were rated on two occasions three months apart by 3 groups of doctors; 4 junior registrars, 4 senior registrars and 4 orthopedic consultants. The fractures were classified as buckle, greenstick, complete or physeal. Kappa statistics were used to analyze inter- and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: The kappa value for interobserver agreement at the first reading was 0.59 for the junior registrars, 0.63 for the senior registrars and 0.66 for the consultants. The mean kappa value for intraobserver reliability was 0.79 for the senior registrars, 0.74 for the consultants and 0.66 for the junior registrars. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the classification tested in this study is reliable and reproducible when applied by raters experienced in fracture management. The reliability varies according to the experience of the raters. Experienced raters can verify the classification, and avoid unnecessary follow-up appointments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3331853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33318532012-04-21 Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience Randsborg, Per-Henrik Sivertsen, Einar A BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: We wanted to test the reliability of a commonly used classification of distal radius fractures in children. METHODS: 105 consecutive fractures of the distal radius in children were rated on two occasions three months apart by 3 groups of doctors; 4 junior registrars, 4 senior registrars and 4 orthopedic consultants. The fractures were classified as buckle, greenstick, complete or physeal. Kappa statistics were used to analyze inter- and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: The kappa value for interobserver agreement at the first reading was 0.59 for the junior registrars, 0.63 for the senior registrars and 0.66 for the consultants. The mean kappa value for intraobserver reliability was 0.79 for the senior registrars, 0.74 for the consultants and 0.66 for the junior registrars. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the classification tested in this study is reliable and reproducible when applied by raters experienced in fracture management. The reliability varies according to the experience of the raters. Experienced raters can verify the classification, and avoid unnecessary follow-up appointments. BioMed Central 2012-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3331853/ /pubmed/22269925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-6 Text en Copyright ©2012 Randsborg and Sivertsen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Randsborg, Per-Henrik Sivertsen, Einar A Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience |
title | Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience |
title_full | Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience |
title_fullStr | Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience |
title_short | Classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience |
title_sort | classification of distal radius fractures in children: good inter- and intraobserver reliability, which improves with clinical experience |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3331853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22269925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT randsborgperhenrik classificationofdistalradiusfracturesinchildrengoodinterandintraobserverreliabilitywhichimproveswithclinicalexperience AT sivertseneinara classificationofdistalradiusfracturesinchildrengoodinterandintraobserverreliabilitywhichimproveswithclinicalexperience |