Cargando…

The Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage: A New Concept in Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Prospective, Noncomparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance

Study Design/Objective. A single-centre, prospective, non-comparative study of 25 patients to evaluate the performance and safety of the Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage (MAC) in Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Summary of Background Data. Interbody fusion cages in general are designed to withstand high axi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kok, D., Donk, R. D., Wapstra, F. H., Veldhuizen, A. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3332066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22567409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/898606
_version_ 1782230174110056448
author Kok, D.
Donk, R. D.
Wapstra, F. H.
Veldhuizen, A. G.
author_facet Kok, D.
Donk, R. D.
Wapstra, F. H.
Veldhuizen, A. G.
author_sort Kok, D.
collection PubMed
description Study Design/Objective. A single-centre, prospective, non-comparative study of 25 patients to evaluate the performance and safety of the Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage (MAC) in Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Summary of Background Data. Interbody fusion cages in general are designed to withstand high axial loads and in the meantime to allow ingrowth of new bone for bony fusion. In many cages the contact area with the endplate is rather large leaving a relatively small contact area for the bone graft with the adjacent host bone. MAC is constructed from the memory metal Nitinol and builds on the concept of sufficient axial support in combination with a large contact area of the graft facilitating bony ingrowth and ease in minimal access implantation due to its high deformability. Methods. Twenty five subjects with a primary diagnosis of disabling back and radicular leg pain from a single level degenerative lumbar disc underwent an interbody fusion using MAC and pedicle screws. Clinical performance was evaluated prospectively over 2 years using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. The interbody fusion status was assessed using conventional radiographs and CT scan. Safety of the device was studied by registration of intra- and post-operative adverse effects. Results. Clinical performance improved significantly (P < .0018), CT scan confirmed solid fusion in all 25 patients at two year follow-up. In two patients migration of the cage occurred, which was resolved uneventfully by placing a larger size at the subsequent revision. Conclusions. We conclude that the Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage (MAC) resulted in 100% solid fusions in 2 years and proved to be safe, although two patients required revision surgery in order to achieve solid fusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3332066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33320662012-05-07 The Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage: A New Concept in Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Prospective, Noncomparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance Kok, D. Donk, R. D. Wapstra, F. H. Veldhuizen, A. G. Adv Orthop Clinical Study Study Design/Objective. A single-centre, prospective, non-comparative study of 25 patients to evaluate the performance and safety of the Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage (MAC) in Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Summary of Background Data. Interbody fusion cages in general are designed to withstand high axial loads and in the meantime to allow ingrowth of new bone for bony fusion. In many cages the contact area with the endplate is rather large leaving a relatively small contact area for the bone graft with the adjacent host bone. MAC is constructed from the memory metal Nitinol and builds on the concept of sufficient axial support in combination with a large contact area of the graft facilitating bony ingrowth and ease in minimal access implantation due to its high deformability. Methods. Twenty five subjects with a primary diagnosis of disabling back and radicular leg pain from a single level degenerative lumbar disc underwent an interbody fusion using MAC and pedicle screws. Clinical performance was evaluated prospectively over 2 years using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. The interbody fusion status was assessed using conventional radiographs and CT scan. Safety of the device was studied by registration of intra- and post-operative adverse effects. Results. Clinical performance improved significantly (P < .0018), CT scan confirmed solid fusion in all 25 patients at two year follow-up. In two patients migration of the cage occurred, which was resolved uneventfully by placing a larger size at the subsequent revision. Conclusions. We conclude that the Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage (MAC) resulted in 100% solid fusions in 2 years and proved to be safe, although two patients required revision surgery in order to achieve solid fusion. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3332066/ /pubmed/22567409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/898606 Text en Copyright © 2012 D. Kok et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kok, D.
Donk, R. D.
Wapstra, F. H.
Veldhuizen, A. G.
The Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage: A New Concept in Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Prospective, Noncomparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance
title The Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage: A New Concept in Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Prospective, Noncomparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance
title_full The Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage: A New Concept in Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Prospective, Noncomparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance
title_fullStr The Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage: A New Concept in Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Prospective, Noncomparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance
title_full_unstemmed The Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage: A New Concept in Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Prospective, Noncomparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance
title_short The Memory Metal Minimal Access Cage: A New Concept in Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Prospective, Noncomparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance
title_sort memory metal minimal access cage: a new concept in lumbar interbody fusion—a prospective, noncomparative study to evaluate the safety and performance
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3332066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22567409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/898606
work_keys_str_mv AT kokd thememorymetalminimalaccesscageanewconceptinlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectivenoncomparativestudytoevaluatethesafetyandperformance
AT donkrd thememorymetalminimalaccesscageanewconceptinlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectivenoncomparativestudytoevaluatethesafetyandperformance
AT wapstrafh thememorymetalminimalaccesscageanewconceptinlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectivenoncomparativestudytoevaluatethesafetyandperformance
AT veldhuizenag thememorymetalminimalaccesscageanewconceptinlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectivenoncomparativestudytoevaluatethesafetyandperformance
AT kokd memorymetalminimalaccesscageanewconceptinlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectivenoncomparativestudytoevaluatethesafetyandperformance
AT donkrd memorymetalminimalaccesscageanewconceptinlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectivenoncomparativestudytoevaluatethesafetyandperformance
AT wapstrafh memorymetalminimalaccesscageanewconceptinlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectivenoncomparativestudytoevaluatethesafetyandperformance
AT veldhuizenag memorymetalminimalaccesscageanewconceptinlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectivenoncomparativestudytoevaluatethesafetyandperformance