Cargando…

Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a multimodal intervention giving the general practitioner (GP) an enhanced role in cancer rehabilitation improves patients' health-related quality of life and psychological distress. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. All general practices in Den...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergholdt, Stinne Holm, Larsen, Pia Veldt, Kragstrup, Jakob, Søndergaard, Jens, Hansen, Dorte Gilså
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3332246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22508956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000764
_version_ 1782230202586234880
author Bergholdt, Stinne Holm
Larsen, Pia Veldt
Kragstrup, Jakob
Søndergaard, Jens
Hansen, Dorte Gilså
author_facet Bergholdt, Stinne Holm
Larsen, Pia Veldt
Kragstrup, Jakob
Søndergaard, Jens
Hansen, Dorte Gilså
author_sort Bergholdt, Stinne Holm
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a multimodal intervention giving the general practitioner (GP) an enhanced role in cancer rehabilitation improves patients' health-related quality of life and psychological distress. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. All general practices in Denmark were randomised to an intervention group or to a control group. Patients were subsequently allocated to intervention or control (usual procedures) based on the randomisation status of their GP. SETTING: All clinical departments at a public regional hospital treating cancer patients and all general practices in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients treated for incident cancer at Vejle Hospital, Denmark, between 12 May 2008 and 28 February 2009. A total of 955 patients (486 to the intervention group and 469 to the control group) registered with 323 general practices were included. INTERVENTION: The intervention included an interview about rehabilitation needs with a rehabilitation coordinator at the regional hospital, information from the hospital to the GP about individual needs for rehabilitation and an encouragement of the GP to contact the patient to offer his support with rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was health-related quality of life measured 6 months after inclusion using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes included quality of life at 14 months and additional subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at 6 and 14 months and psychological distress at 14 months using the Profile of Mood States Scale. RESULTS: No effect of the intervention was observed on primary and/or secondary outcomes after 6 and 14 months. CONCLUSION: A multimodal intervention aiming to give the GP an enhanced role in cancer patients' rehabilitation did not improve quality of life or psychological distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, registration ID number NCT01021371.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3332246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33322462012-04-23 Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial Bergholdt, Stinne Holm Larsen, Pia Veldt Kragstrup, Jakob Søndergaard, Jens Hansen, Dorte Gilså BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a multimodal intervention giving the general practitioner (GP) an enhanced role in cancer rehabilitation improves patients' health-related quality of life and psychological distress. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. All general practices in Denmark were randomised to an intervention group or to a control group. Patients were subsequently allocated to intervention or control (usual procedures) based on the randomisation status of their GP. SETTING: All clinical departments at a public regional hospital treating cancer patients and all general practices in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients treated for incident cancer at Vejle Hospital, Denmark, between 12 May 2008 and 28 February 2009. A total of 955 patients (486 to the intervention group and 469 to the control group) registered with 323 general practices were included. INTERVENTION: The intervention included an interview about rehabilitation needs with a rehabilitation coordinator at the regional hospital, information from the hospital to the GP about individual needs for rehabilitation and an encouragement of the GP to contact the patient to offer his support with rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was health-related quality of life measured 6 months after inclusion using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes included quality of life at 14 months and additional subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at 6 and 14 months and psychological distress at 14 months using the Profile of Mood States Scale. RESULTS: No effect of the intervention was observed on primary and/or secondary outcomes after 6 and 14 months. CONCLUSION: A multimodal intervention aiming to give the GP an enhanced role in cancer patients' rehabilitation did not improve quality of life or psychological distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, registration ID number NCT01021371. BMJ Group 2012-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3332246/ /pubmed/22508956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000764 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Bergholdt, Stinne Holm
Larsen, Pia Veldt
Kragstrup, Jakob
Søndergaard, Jens
Hansen, Dorte Gilså
Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial
title Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3332246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22508956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000764
work_keys_str_mv AT bergholdtstinneholm enhancedinvolvementofgeneralpractitionersincancerrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT larsenpiaveldt enhancedinvolvementofgeneralpractitionersincancerrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kragstrupjakob enhancedinvolvementofgeneralpractitionersincancerrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT søndergaardjens enhancedinvolvementofgeneralpractitionersincancerrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hansendortegilsa enhancedinvolvementofgeneralpractitionersincancerrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial