Cargando…

Outcomes and complications of fibular head resection

The fibular head is often used as donor graft material for reconstruction of defects of the distal radius. However little is known on the safety of such a procedure. This report describes the long-term donor-site morbidity following the procedure. Fourteen patients who underwent simple or marginal r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, D. K., Saseendar, S., Patro, D. K., Menon, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3332321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22467142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-012-0133-8
_version_ 1782230207985352704
author Agarwal, D. K.
Saseendar, S.
Patro, D. K.
Menon, J.
author_facet Agarwal, D. K.
Saseendar, S.
Patro, D. K.
Menon, J.
author_sort Agarwal, D. K.
collection PubMed
description The fibular head is often used as donor graft material for reconstruction of defects of the distal radius. However little is known on the safety of such a procedure. This report describes the long-term donor-site morbidity following the procedure. Fourteen patients who underwent simple or marginal resections of the proximal fibula between 1990 and 2007 were reviewed. Subjective donor-site morbidity, knee and ankle range of motion and instability, presence of sensory or motor function loss, gait and fibular regeneration were assessed. The mean age at surgery was 25 years; six were male, eight were female and the mean follow-up was 11 years. Abnormal clinical findings were present in 10 patients (71.4 %): nine patients (64.3 %) had Grade 2 varus laxity at the knee confirmed by stress radiographs; one had sensory loss in the distribution of the superficial peroneal nerve. Patients with varus laxity had significantly higher mean age at surgery than those without varus laxity (p = 0.001). None had deformity at the knee or ankle. The range of joint movements was normal. All had a normal tibiotalar angle and none had proximal migration of the fibula. One patient demonstrated near-complete regeneration of the fibula. Donor-site morbidity following simple and marginal resection of the proximal fibula is acceptable. Older patients had a higher risk of demonstrable varus laxity at the knee but proximal fibula resection in children appears to be safe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3332321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33323212012-05-09 Outcomes and complications of fibular head resection Agarwal, D. K. Saseendar, S. Patro, D. K. Menon, J. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Original Article The fibular head is often used as donor graft material for reconstruction of defects of the distal radius. However little is known on the safety of such a procedure. This report describes the long-term donor-site morbidity following the procedure. Fourteen patients who underwent simple or marginal resections of the proximal fibula between 1990 and 2007 were reviewed. Subjective donor-site morbidity, knee and ankle range of motion and instability, presence of sensory or motor function loss, gait and fibular regeneration were assessed. The mean age at surgery was 25 years; six were male, eight were female and the mean follow-up was 11 years. Abnormal clinical findings were present in 10 patients (71.4 %): nine patients (64.3 %) had Grade 2 varus laxity at the knee confirmed by stress radiographs; one had sensory loss in the distribution of the superficial peroneal nerve. Patients with varus laxity had significantly higher mean age at surgery than those without varus laxity (p = 0.001). None had deformity at the knee or ankle. The range of joint movements was normal. All had a normal tibiotalar angle and none had proximal migration of the fibula. One patient demonstrated near-complete regeneration of the fibula. Donor-site morbidity following simple and marginal resection of the proximal fibula is acceptable. Older patients had a higher risk of demonstrable varus laxity at the knee but proximal fibula resection in children appears to be safe. Springer Milan 2012-03-31 2012-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3332321/ /pubmed/22467142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-012-0133-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agarwal, D. K.
Saseendar, S.
Patro, D. K.
Menon, J.
Outcomes and complications of fibular head resection
title Outcomes and complications of fibular head resection
title_full Outcomes and complications of fibular head resection
title_fullStr Outcomes and complications of fibular head resection
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and complications of fibular head resection
title_short Outcomes and complications of fibular head resection
title_sort outcomes and complications of fibular head resection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3332321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22467142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-012-0133-8
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwaldk outcomesandcomplicationsoffibularheadresection
AT saseendars outcomesandcomplicationsoffibularheadresection
AT patrodk outcomesandcomplicationsoffibularheadresection
AT menonj outcomesandcomplicationsoffibularheadresection