Cargando…

Maximizing neuroprotection: where do we stand?

Brain and spinal cord traumas include blunt and penetrating trauma, disease, and required surgery. Such traumas trigger events such as inflammation, infiltration of inflammatory and other cells, oxidative stress, acidification, excitotoxicity, ischemia, and the loss of calcium homeostasis, all of wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kuffler, Damien P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3333458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22547938
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S16196
_version_ 1782230453964505088
author Kuffler, Damien P
author_facet Kuffler, Damien P
author_sort Kuffler, Damien P
collection PubMed
description Brain and spinal cord traumas include blunt and penetrating trauma, disease, and required surgery. Such traumas trigger events such as inflammation, infiltration of inflammatory and other cells, oxidative stress, acidification, excitotoxicity, ischemia, and the loss of calcium homeostasis, all of which cause neurotoxicity and neuron death. To prevent trauma-induced neurological deficits and death, each of the many neurotoxic events that occur in parallel or sequentially must be minimized or prevented. Although neuroprotective techniques have been developed that block single neurotoxic events, most provide only limited neuroprotection and are only applied singly. However, because many neurotoxicity triggers arise from common events, an approach for invoking more effective neuroprotection is to apply multiple neuroprotective methods simultaneously before the many neurotoxic triggers and cascades are initiated and become irreversible. This paper first discusses some triggers of neurotoxicity and neuroprotective mechanisms that block them, including hypothermia, alkalinization, and the administration of adenosine. It then examines how the simultaneous application of these techniques provides significantly greater neuroprotection than is provided by any technique alone. The paper also stresses the importance of determining whether the neuroprotection provided by these techniques can be further enhanced by combining them with additional techniques, such as the systemic administration of glucocorticoids. Finally, the paper stresses the absolute critical importance of applying these techniques within the “golden hour” following trauma, before the many neurotoxic events and cascades are manifest and before the neurotoxic cascades become irreversible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3333458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33334582012-04-30 Maximizing neuroprotection: where do we stand? Kuffler, Damien P Ther Clin Risk Manag Review Brain and spinal cord traumas include blunt and penetrating trauma, disease, and required surgery. Such traumas trigger events such as inflammation, infiltration of inflammatory and other cells, oxidative stress, acidification, excitotoxicity, ischemia, and the loss of calcium homeostasis, all of which cause neurotoxicity and neuron death. To prevent trauma-induced neurological deficits and death, each of the many neurotoxic events that occur in parallel or sequentially must be minimized or prevented. Although neuroprotective techniques have been developed that block single neurotoxic events, most provide only limited neuroprotection and are only applied singly. However, because many neurotoxicity triggers arise from common events, an approach for invoking more effective neuroprotection is to apply multiple neuroprotective methods simultaneously before the many neurotoxic triggers and cascades are initiated and become irreversible. This paper first discusses some triggers of neurotoxicity and neuroprotective mechanisms that block them, including hypothermia, alkalinization, and the administration of adenosine. It then examines how the simultaneous application of these techniques provides significantly greater neuroprotection than is provided by any technique alone. The paper also stresses the importance of determining whether the neuroprotection provided by these techniques can be further enhanced by combining them with additional techniques, such as the systemic administration of glucocorticoids. Finally, the paper stresses the absolute critical importance of applying these techniques within the “golden hour” following trauma, before the many neurotoxic events and cascades are manifest and before the neurotoxic cascades become irreversible. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3333458/ /pubmed/22547938 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S16196 Text en © 2012 Kuffler, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Kuffler, Damien P
Maximizing neuroprotection: where do we stand?
title Maximizing neuroprotection: where do we stand?
title_full Maximizing neuroprotection: where do we stand?
title_fullStr Maximizing neuroprotection: where do we stand?
title_full_unstemmed Maximizing neuroprotection: where do we stand?
title_short Maximizing neuroprotection: where do we stand?
title_sort maximizing neuroprotection: where do we stand?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3333458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22547938
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S16196
work_keys_str_mv AT kufflerdamienp maximizingneuroprotectionwheredowestand