Cargando…

Optimal selection for multiple quantitative trait loci and contributions of individuals using genetic algorithm

Two methods (Scheme A and Scheme B) were developed to optimize the relative weights on quantitative trait loci (QTL) and contributions of selected individuals simultaneously to maximize selection response while constraining the rate of inbreeding to the rate observed in gene assisted selection (GAS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, G., Lin, P., Xu, C., Xue, J., Liu, T., Wang, Z., Li, X.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.010
_version_ 1782230612221886464
author Tang, G.
Lin, P.
Xu, C.
Xue, J.
Liu, T.
Wang, Z.
Li, X.
author_facet Tang, G.
Lin, P.
Xu, C.
Xue, J.
Liu, T.
Wang, Z.
Li, X.
author_sort Tang, G.
collection PubMed
description Two methods (Scheme A and Scheme B) were developed to optimize the relative weights on quantitative trait loci (QTL) and contributions of selected individuals simultaneously to maximize selection response while constraining the rate of inbreeding to the rate observed in gene assisted selection (GAS). In Scheme A, both the relative weights give to QTL and contributions of the selected individuals were optimized using a genetic algorithm. The possible solutions for relative weights of QTL and contributions of the selected individuals were encoded simultaneously. A physical selection population was used to evaluate the fitness of each encoded solution using stochastic simulation with 50 replicates. The fitness of each solution was the mean of all replicates for accumulative discounted sum of genetic means of all generations in physical selection population. In Scheme B, the optimization for relative weights on QTL was similar to Scheme A, and also was implemented based on a genetic algorithm. However, unlike Scheme A, an optimal contribution algorithm (OC) was used to optimize contributions of selection candidates. When compared with GAS, Schemes A and B resulted in up to 15.88 and 22.26% extra discounted sum of genetic value of all generations in a long planning horizon, respectively. Compared GAS+OC and Scheme B, most of the increase (about 78%) in genetic gain was produced by only optimizing contributions of selected individuals. The optimization for relative weight given to QTL just avoided the long-term loss (about 22%) observed in GAS scheme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3334203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33342032012-05-08 Optimal selection for multiple quantitative trait loci and contributions of individuals using genetic algorithm Tang, G. Lin, P. Xu, C. Xue, J. Liu, T. Wang, Z. Li, X. Livest Sci Article Two methods (Scheme A and Scheme B) were developed to optimize the relative weights on quantitative trait loci (QTL) and contributions of selected individuals simultaneously to maximize selection response while constraining the rate of inbreeding to the rate observed in gene assisted selection (GAS). In Scheme A, both the relative weights give to QTL and contributions of the selected individuals were optimized using a genetic algorithm. The possible solutions for relative weights of QTL and contributions of the selected individuals were encoded simultaneously. A physical selection population was used to evaluate the fitness of each encoded solution using stochastic simulation with 50 replicates. The fitness of each solution was the mean of all replicates for accumulative discounted sum of genetic means of all generations in physical selection population. In Scheme B, the optimization for relative weights on QTL was similar to Scheme A, and also was implemented based on a genetic algorithm. However, unlike Scheme A, an optimal contribution algorithm (OC) was used to optimize contributions of selection candidates. When compared with GAS, Schemes A and B resulted in up to 15.88 and 22.26% extra discounted sum of genetic value of all generations in a long planning horizon, respectively. Compared GAS+OC and Scheme B, most of the increase (about 78%) in genetic gain was produced by only optimizing contributions of selected individuals. The optimization for relative weight given to QTL just avoided the long-term loss (about 22%) observed in GAS scheme. Elsevier 2011-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3334203/ /pubmed/22577484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.010 Text en © 2011 Elsevier B.V. This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/supplementalterms1.0) .
spellingShingle Article
Tang, G.
Lin, P.
Xu, C.
Xue, J.
Liu, T.
Wang, Z.
Li, X.
Optimal selection for multiple quantitative trait loci and contributions of individuals using genetic algorithm
title Optimal selection for multiple quantitative trait loci and contributions of individuals using genetic algorithm
title_full Optimal selection for multiple quantitative trait loci and contributions of individuals using genetic algorithm
title_fullStr Optimal selection for multiple quantitative trait loci and contributions of individuals using genetic algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Optimal selection for multiple quantitative trait loci and contributions of individuals using genetic algorithm
title_short Optimal selection for multiple quantitative trait loci and contributions of individuals using genetic algorithm
title_sort optimal selection for multiple quantitative trait loci and contributions of individuals using genetic algorithm
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.010
work_keys_str_mv AT tangg optimalselectionformultiplequantitativetraitlociandcontributionsofindividualsusinggeneticalgorithm
AT linp optimalselectionformultiplequantitativetraitlociandcontributionsofindividualsusinggeneticalgorithm
AT xuc optimalselectionformultiplequantitativetraitlociandcontributionsofindividualsusinggeneticalgorithm
AT xuej optimalselectionformultiplequantitativetraitlociandcontributionsofindividualsusinggeneticalgorithm
AT liut optimalselectionformultiplequantitativetraitlociandcontributionsofindividualsusinggeneticalgorithm
AT wangz optimalselectionformultiplequantitativetraitlociandcontributionsofindividualsusinggeneticalgorithm
AT lix optimalselectionformultiplequantitativetraitlociandcontributionsofindividualsusinggeneticalgorithm