Cargando…

Evaluation of the surgical learning curve for I-125 episcleral plaque placement for the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma: a two decade review

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical learning curve in episceral plaque brachytherapy placement in the management of posterior uveal melanoma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of two cohorts of 250 consecutive patients undergoing plaque placement for posterior uveal melanoma from 2002 to 2004 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Nisha V, Houston, Samuel K, Murray, Timothy G, Markoe, Arnold M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22536035
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S30307
_version_ 1782230614274998272
author Shah, Nisha V
Houston, Samuel K
Murray, Timothy G
Markoe, Arnold M
author_facet Shah, Nisha V
Houston, Samuel K
Murray, Timothy G
Markoe, Arnold M
author_sort Shah, Nisha V
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical learning curve in episceral plaque brachytherapy placement in the management of posterior uveal melanoma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of two cohorts of 250 consecutive patients undergoing plaque placement for posterior uveal melanoma from 2002 to 2004 and from 2008 to 2009 was conducted. The plaque–tumor apposition rates verified by intraoperative echography were evaluated and correlated with surgical volume over a 19-year period. RESULTS: In an initial study of 29 consecutive patients undergoing plaque placement from January 1992 to January 1995, a suboptimal plaque placement rate of 21% (n = 29) was identified. This percentage declined to 12% (n = 100) from January 2002 to January 2004, and further declined to 4% (n = 150) from June 2008 to August 2009. The tumor–plaque apposition rates for these three groups were 79% (1992–1995), 88% (2002–2004), and 96% (2008–2009). An estimated surgical volume of 1275 cases was performed to achieve a >90% precision rate for first application of primary plaque centration. CONCLUSION: There are challenges to mastering the precise placement of radioactive plaques for posterior uveal melanoma. We have demonstrated a significant learning curve for plaque placement techniques, and have emphasized the importance of intraoperative ultrasound in the verification of plaque placement, thus allowing for intraoperative repositioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3334212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33342122012-04-25 Evaluation of the surgical learning curve for I-125 episcleral plaque placement for the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma: a two decade review Shah, Nisha V Houston, Samuel K Murray, Timothy G Markoe, Arnold M Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical learning curve in episceral plaque brachytherapy placement in the management of posterior uveal melanoma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of two cohorts of 250 consecutive patients undergoing plaque placement for posterior uveal melanoma from 2002 to 2004 and from 2008 to 2009 was conducted. The plaque–tumor apposition rates verified by intraoperative echography were evaluated and correlated with surgical volume over a 19-year period. RESULTS: In an initial study of 29 consecutive patients undergoing plaque placement from January 1992 to January 1995, a suboptimal plaque placement rate of 21% (n = 29) was identified. This percentage declined to 12% (n = 100) from January 2002 to January 2004, and further declined to 4% (n = 150) from June 2008 to August 2009. The tumor–plaque apposition rates for these three groups were 79% (1992–1995), 88% (2002–2004), and 96% (2008–2009). An estimated surgical volume of 1275 cases was performed to achieve a >90% precision rate for first application of primary plaque centration. CONCLUSION: There are challenges to mastering the precise placement of radioactive plaques for posterior uveal melanoma. We have demonstrated a significant learning curve for plaque placement techniques, and have emphasized the importance of intraoperative ultrasound in the verification of plaque placement, thus allowing for intraoperative repositioning. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3334212/ /pubmed/22536035 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S30307 Text en © 2012 Shah et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shah, Nisha V
Houston, Samuel K
Murray, Timothy G
Markoe, Arnold M
Evaluation of the surgical learning curve for I-125 episcleral plaque placement for the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma: a two decade review
title Evaluation of the surgical learning curve for I-125 episcleral plaque placement for the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma: a two decade review
title_full Evaluation of the surgical learning curve for I-125 episcleral plaque placement for the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma: a two decade review
title_fullStr Evaluation of the surgical learning curve for I-125 episcleral plaque placement for the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma: a two decade review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the surgical learning curve for I-125 episcleral plaque placement for the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma: a two decade review
title_short Evaluation of the surgical learning curve for I-125 episcleral plaque placement for the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma: a two decade review
title_sort evaluation of the surgical learning curve for i-125 episcleral plaque placement for the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma: a two decade review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22536035
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S30307
work_keys_str_mv AT shahnishav evaluationofthesurgicallearningcurvefori125episcleralplaqueplacementforthetreatmentofposterioruvealmelanomaatwodecadereview
AT houstonsamuelk evaluationofthesurgicallearningcurvefori125episcleralplaqueplacementforthetreatmentofposterioruvealmelanomaatwodecadereview
AT murraytimothyg evaluationofthesurgicallearningcurvefori125episcleralplaqueplacementforthetreatmentofposterioruvealmelanomaatwodecadereview
AT markoearnoldm evaluationofthesurgicallearningcurvefori125episcleralplaqueplacementforthetreatmentofposterioruvealmelanomaatwodecadereview