Cargando…
Haemodynamic optimisation: are we dynamic enough?
Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation of high-risk surgical patients has long been documented to improve both short-term and long-term outcomes, as well as to reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Based on the evidence, cardiac output monitoring and fluid resuscitation, combined with the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22078179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10480 |
_version_ | 1782230686198923264 |
---|---|
author | Parker, Sophie J Boyd, Owen |
author_facet | Parker, Sophie J Boyd, Owen |
author_sort | Parker, Sophie J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation of high-risk surgical patients has long been documented to improve both short-term and long-term outcomes, as well as to reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Based on the evidence, cardiac output monitoring and fluid resuscitation, combined with the use of inotropes, would seem to be the gold standard of care for these difficult surgical cases. However, clinicians do not universally apply these techniques and principles in their everyday practice. By exploring the reasons why this is so, perhaps we could move forward in the standardisation of care and the application of evidence-based practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3334785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33347852012-04-28 Haemodynamic optimisation: are we dynamic enough? Parker, Sophie J Boyd, Owen Crit Care Commentary Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation of high-risk surgical patients has long been documented to improve both short-term and long-term outcomes, as well as to reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Based on the evidence, cardiac output monitoring and fluid resuscitation, combined with the use of inotropes, would seem to be the gold standard of care for these difficult surgical cases. However, clinicians do not universally apply these techniques and principles in their everyday practice. By exploring the reasons why this is so, perhaps we could move forward in the standardisation of care and the application of evidence-based practice. BioMed Central 2011 2011-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3334785/ /pubmed/22078179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10480 Text en Copyright ©2011 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Parker, Sophie J Boyd, Owen Haemodynamic optimisation: are we dynamic enough? |
title | Haemodynamic optimisation: are we dynamic enough? |
title_full | Haemodynamic optimisation: are we dynamic enough? |
title_fullStr | Haemodynamic optimisation: are we dynamic enough? |
title_full_unstemmed | Haemodynamic optimisation: are we dynamic enough? |
title_short | Haemodynamic optimisation: are we dynamic enough? |
title_sort | haemodynamic optimisation: are we dynamic enough? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22078179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkersophiej haemodynamicoptimisationarewedynamicenough AT boydowen haemodynamicoptimisationarewedynamicenough |