Cargando…

Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis

INTRODUCTION: During the past decade, the incidence of Candida infections in hospitalized patients has increased, with fluconazole being the most commonly prescribed systemic antifungal agent for these infections. However, the 2009 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) candidiasis guidelines...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kett, Daniel H, Shorr, Andrew F, Reboli, Annette C, Reisman, Arlene L, Biswas, Pinaki, Schlamm, Haran T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22026929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10514
_version_ 1782230690616573952
author Kett, Daniel H
Shorr, Andrew F
Reboli, Annette C
Reisman, Arlene L
Biswas, Pinaki
Schlamm, Haran T
author_facet Kett, Daniel H
Shorr, Andrew F
Reboli, Annette C
Reisman, Arlene L
Biswas, Pinaki
Schlamm, Haran T
author_sort Kett, Daniel H
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: During the past decade, the incidence of Candida infections in hospitalized patients has increased, with fluconazole being the most commonly prescribed systemic antifungal agent for these infections. However, the 2009 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) candidiasis guidelines recommend an echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia/invasive candidiasis in patients who are considered to be "moderately severe or severely" ill. To validate these guidelines, clinical trial data were reviewed. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from a previously published prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was performed; it compared anidulafungin with fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidemia. Patients with critical illness were identified at study entry by using the following criteria: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of ≥ 15, evidence of severe sepsis (sepsis and one or more end-organ dysfunctions) present, and/or patient was in intensive care. Global response rates were compared at the end of intravenous study treatment (the primary end point of the original study) and all-cause mortality at 14 and 28 days from study entry in this group. RESULTS: The patients (163 (66.5%) of 245) fulfilled at least one criterion for critical illness (anidulafungin, n = 89; fluconazole, n = 74). No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups. The global response rate was 70.8% for anidulafungin and 54.1% for fluconazole (P = 0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0 to 31.5); all-cause mortality was 10.1% versus 20.3% at 14 days (P = 0.08; 95% CI, -0.9 to 21.3) and was 20.2% versus 24.3% at 28 days (P = 0.57; 95% CI, -8.8 to 17.0) for anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, anidulafungin was more effective than fluconazole for treatment of severely ill patients with candidemia, thus supporting the 2009 IDSA guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00058682.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3334804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33348042012-04-25 Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis Kett, Daniel H Shorr, Andrew F Reboli, Annette C Reisman, Arlene L Biswas, Pinaki Schlamm, Haran T Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: During the past decade, the incidence of Candida infections in hospitalized patients has increased, with fluconazole being the most commonly prescribed systemic antifungal agent for these infections. However, the 2009 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) candidiasis guidelines recommend an echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia/invasive candidiasis in patients who are considered to be "moderately severe or severely" ill. To validate these guidelines, clinical trial data were reviewed. METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from a previously published prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was performed; it compared anidulafungin with fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidemia. Patients with critical illness were identified at study entry by using the following criteria: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of ≥ 15, evidence of severe sepsis (sepsis and one or more end-organ dysfunctions) present, and/or patient was in intensive care. Global response rates were compared at the end of intravenous study treatment (the primary end point of the original study) and all-cause mortality at 14 and 28 days from study entry in this group. RESULTS: The patients (163 (66.5%) of 245) fulfilled at least one criterion for critical illness (anidulafungin, n = 89; fluconazole, n = 74). No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups. The global response rate was 70.8% for anidulafungin and 54.1% for fluconazole (P = 0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0 to 31.5); all-cause mortality was 10.1% versus 20.3% at 14 days (P = 0.08; 95% CI, -0.9 to 21.3) and was 20.2% versus 24.3% at 28 days (P = 0.57; 95% CI, -8.8 to 17.0) for anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, anidulafungin was more effective than fluconazole for treatment of severely ill patients with candidemia, thus supporting the 2009 IDSA guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00058682. BioMed Central 2011 2011-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3334804/ /pubmed/22026929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10514 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kett et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kett, Daniel H
Shorr, Andrew F
Reboli, Annette C
Reisman, Arlene L
Biswas, Pinaki
Schlamm, Haran T
Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis
title Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis
title_full Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis
title_fullStr Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis
title_full_unstemmed Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis
title_short Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: Support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis
title_sort anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: support for the 2009 idsa treatment guidelines for candidiasis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22026929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc10514
work_keys_str_mv AT kettdanielh anidulafungincomparedwithfluconazoleinseverelyillpatientswithcandidemiaandotherformsofinvasivecandidiasissupportforthe2009idsatreatmentguidelinesforcandidiasis
AT shorrandrewf anidulafungincomparedwithfluconazoleinseverelyillpatientswithcandidemiaandotherformsofinvasivecandidiasissupportforthe2009idsatreatmentguidelinesforcandidiasis
AT reboliannettec anidulafungincomparedwithfluconazoleinseverelyillpatientswithcandidemiaandotherformsofinvasivecandidiasissupportforthe2009idsatreatmentguidelinesforcandidiasis
AT reismanarlenel anidulafungincomparedwithfluconazoleinseverelyillpatientswithcandidemiaandotherformsofinvasivecandidiasissupportforthe2009idsatreatmentguidelinesforcandidiasis
AT biswaspinaki anidulafungincomparedwithfluconazoleinseverelyillpatientswithcandidemiaandotherformsofinvasivecandidiasissupportforthe2009idsatreatmentguidelinesforcandidiasis
AT schlammharant anidulafungincomparedwithfluconazoleinseverelyillpatientswithcandidemiaandotherformsofinvasivecandidiasissupportforthe2009idsatreatmentguidelinesforcandidiasis