Cargando…

Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines

Background: In preparation for implementation of a central water processing system at a dental department, we analyzed the costs of conventional decentralized disinfection of dental units against a central water treatment concept based on electrochemical disinfection. Methods: The cost evaluation in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Sebastian, Meyer, Georg, Kramer, Axel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000192
_version_ 1782230713265815552
author Fischer, Sebastian
Meyer, Georg
Kramer, Axel
author_facet Fischer, Sebastian
Meyer, Georg
Kramer, Axel
author_sort Fischer, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Background: In preparation for implementation of a central water processing system at a dental department, we analyzed the costs of conventional decentralized disinfection of dental units against a central water treatment concept based on electrochemical disinfection. Methods: The cost evaluation included only the costs of annually required antimicrobial consumables and additional water usage of a decentralize conventional maintenance system for dental water lines build in the respective dental units and the central electrochemical water disinfection system, BLUE SAFETY™ Technologies. Results: In total, analysis of costs of 6 dental departments reviled additional annual costs for hygienic preventive measures of € 4,448.37. For the BLUE SAFETY™ Technology, the additional annual total agent consumption costs were € 2.18, accounting for approximately 0.05% of the annual total agent consumption costs of the conventional maintenance system. For both water processing concepts, the additional costs for energy could not be calculated, since the required data was not obtainable from the manufacturers. Discussion: For both concepts, the investment and maintenance costs were not calculated due to lack of manufacturer's data. Therefore, the results indicate the difference of costs for the required consumables only. Aside of the significantly lower annual costs for required consumables and disinfectants; a second advantage for the BLUE SAFETY™ Technology is its constant and automatic operation, which does not require additional staff resources. This not only safety human resources, but add additionally to cost saving. Conclusion: Since the antimicrobial disinfection capacity of the BLUE SAFETY™ was demonstrated previously and is well known, this technology, which is comparable or even superior in its non-corrosive effect, may be regarded as method of choice for continuous disinfection and prevention of biofilm formation in dental units’ water lines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3334949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33349492012-05-03 Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines Fischer, Sebastian Meyer, Georg Kramer, Axel GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip Article Background: In preparation for implementation of a central water processing system at a dental department, we analyzed the costs of conventional decentralized disinfection of dental units against a central water treatment concept based on electrochemical disinfection. Methods: The cost evaluation included only the costs of annually required antimicrobial consumables and additional water usage of a decentralize conventional maintenance system for dental water lines build in the respective dental units and the central electrochemical water disinfection system, BLUE SAFETY™ Technologies. Results: In total, analysis of costs of 6 dental departments reviled additional annual costs for hygienic preventive measures of € 4,448.37. For the BLUE SAFETY™ Technology, the additional annual total agent consumption costs were € 2.18, accounting for approximately 0.05% of the annual total agent consumption costs of the conventional maintenance system. For both water processing concepts, the additional costs for energy could not be calculated, since the required data was not obtainable from the manufacturers. Discussion: For both concepts, the investment and maintenance costs were not calculated due to lack of manufacturer's data. Therefore, the results indicate the difference of costs for the required consumables only. Aside of the significantly lower annual costs for required consumables and disinfectants; a second advantage for the BLUE SAFETY™ Technology is its constant and automatic operation, which does not require additional staff resources. This not only safety human resources, but add additionally to cost saving. Conclusion: Since the antimicrobial disinfection capacity of the BLUE SAFETY™ was demonstrated previously and is well known, this technology, which is comparable or even superior in its non-corrosive effect, may be regarded as method of choice for continuous disinfection and prevention of biofilm formation in dental units’ water lines. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2012-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3334949/ /pubmed/22558042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000192 Text en Copyright © 2012 Fischer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Fischer, Sebastian
Meyer, Georg
Kramer, Axel
Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines
title Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines
title_full Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines
title_fullStr Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines
title_full_unstemmed Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines
title_short Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines
title_sort economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000192
work_keys_str_mv AT fischersebastian economiccomparisonofconventionalmaintenanceandelectrochemicaloxidationtowarrantwatersafetyindentalunitwaterlines
AT meyergeorg economiccomparisonofconventionalmaintenanceandelectrochemicaloxidationtowarrantwatersafetyindentalunitwaterlines
AT krameraxel economiccomparisonofconventionalmaintenanceandelectrochemicaloxidationtowarrantwatersafetyindentalunitwaterlines