Cargando…
Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines
Background: In preparation for implementation of a central water processing system at a dental department, we analyzed the costs of conventional decentralized disinfection of dental units against a central water treatment concept based on electrochemical disinfection. Methods: The cost evaluation in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000192 |
_version_ | 1782230713265815552 |
---|---|
author | Fischer, Sebastian Meyer, Georg Kramer, Axel |
author_facet | Fischer, Sebastian Meyer, Georg Kramer, Axel |
author_sort | Fischer, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In preparation for implementation of a central water processing system at a dental department, we analyzed the costs of conventional decentralized disinfection of dental units against a central water treatment concept based on electrochemical disinfection. Methods: The cost evaluation included only the costs of annually required antimicrobial consumables and additional water usage of a decentralize conventional maintenance system for dental water lines build in the respective dental units and the central electrochemical water disinfection system, BLUE SAFETY™ Technologies. Results: In total, analysis of costs of 6 dental departments reviled additional annual costs for hygienic preventive measures of € 4,448.37. For the BLUE SAFETY™ Technology, the additional annual total agent consumption costs were € 2.18, accounting for approximately 0.05% of the annual total agent consumption costs of the conventional maintenance system. For both water processing concepts, the additional costs for energy could not be calculated, since the required data was not obtainable from the manufacturers. Discussion: For both concepts, the investment and maintenance costs were not calculated due to lack of manufacturer's data. Therefore, the results indicate the difference of costs for the required consumables only. Aside of the significantly lower annual costs for required consumables and disinfectants; a second advantage for the BLUE SAFETY™ Technology is its constant and automatic operation, which does not require additional staff resources. This not only safety human resources, but add additionally to cost saving. Conclusion: Since the antimicrobial disinfection capacity of the BLUE SAFETY™ was demonstrated previously and is well known, this technology, which is comparable or even superior in its non-corrosive effect, may be regarded as method of choice for continuous disinfection and prevention of biofilm formation in dental units’ water lines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3334949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33349492012-05-03 Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines Fischer, Sebastian Meyer, Georg Kramer, Axel GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip Article Background: In preparation for implementation of a central water processing system at a dental department, we analyzed the costs of conventional decentralized disinfection of dental units against a central water treatment concept based on electrochemical disinfection. Methods: The cost evaluation included only the costs of annually required antimicrobial consumables and additional water usage of a decentralize conventional maintenance system for dental water lines build in the respective dental units and the central electrochemical water disinfection system, BLUE SAFETY™ Technologies. Results: In total, analysis of costs of 6 dental departments reviled additional annual costs for hygienic preventive measures of € 4,448.37. For the BLUE SAFETY™ Technology, the additional annual total agent consumption costs were € 2.18, accounting for approximately 0.05% of the annual total agent consumption costs of the conventional maintenance system. For both water processing concepts, the additional costs for energy could not be calculated, since the required data was not obtainable from the manufacturers. Discussion: For both concepts, the investment and maintenance costs were not calculated due to lack of manufacturer's data. Therefore, the results indicate the difference of costs for the required consumables only. Aside of the significantly lower annual costs for required consumables and disinfectants; a second advantage for the BLUE SAFETY™ Technology is its constant and automatic operation, which does not require additional staff resources. This not only safety human resources, but add additionally to cost saving. Conclusion: Since the antimicrobial disinfection capacity of the BLUE SAFETY™ was demonstrated previously and is well known, this technology, which is comparable or even superior in its non-corrosive effect, may be regarded as method of choice for continuous disinfection and prevention of biofilm formation in dental units’ water lines. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2012-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3334949/ /pubmed/22558042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000192 Text en Copyright © 2012 Fischer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Fischer, Sebastian Meyer, Georg Kramer, Axel Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines |
title | Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines |
title_full | Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines |
title_fullStr | Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines |
title_short | Economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines |
title_sort | economic comparison of conventional maintenance and electrochemical oxidation to warrant water safety in dental unit water lines |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3334949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fischersebastian economiccomparisonofconventionalmaintenanceandelectrochemicaloxidationtowarrantwatersafetyindentalunitwaterlines AT meyergeorg economiccomparisonofconventionalmaintenanceandelectrochemicaloxidationtowarrantwatersafetyindentalunitwaterlines AT krameraxel economiccomparisonofconventionalmaintenanceandelectrochemicaloxidationtowarrantwatersafetyindentalunitwaterlines |