Cargando…

Soil ecotoxicology: state of the art and future directions

Abstract. Developments in soil ecotoxicology started with observations on pesticide effects on soil invertebrates in the 1960s. To support the risk assessment of chemicals, in the 1980s and 1990s development of toxicity tests was the main issue, including single species tests and also more realistic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: van Gestel, Cornelis A.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22536114
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.176.2275
_version_ 1782230789516165120
author van Gestel, Cornelis A.M.
author_facet van Gestel, Cornelis A.M.
author_sort van Gestel, Cornelis A.M.
collection PubMed
description Abstract. Developments in soil ecotoxicology started with observations on pesticide effects on soil invertebrates in the 1960s. To support the risk assessment of chemicals, in the 1980s and 1990s development of toxicity tests was the main issue, including single species tests and also more realistic test systems like model ecosystems and field tests focusing on structural and functional endpoints. In the mean time, awareness grew about issues like bioavailability and routes of exposure, while biochemical endpoints (biomarkers) were proposed as sensitive and potential early-warning tools. In recent years, interactions between different chemicals (mixture toxicity) and between chemical and other stressors attracted scientific interest. With the development of molecular biology, omics tools are gaining increasing interest, while the ecological relevance of exposure and effects is translating into concepts like (chemical) stress ecology, ecological vulnerability and trait-based approaches. This contribution addresses historical developments and focuses on current issues in soil ecotoxicology. It is concluded that soil ecotoxicological risk assessment would benefit from extending the available battery of toxicity tests by including e.g. isopods, by paying more attention to exposure, bioavailability and toxicokinetics, and by developing more insight into the ecology of soil organisms to support better understanding of exposure and long-term consequences of chemical exposure at the individual, population and community level. Ecotoxicogenomics tools may also be helpful in this, but will require considerable further research before they can be applied in the practice of soil ecotoxicological risk assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3335420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33354202012-04-25 Soil ecotoxicology: state of the art and future directions van Gestel, Cornelis A.M. Zookeys Article Abstract. Developments in soil ecotoxicology started with observations on pesticide effects on soil invertebrates in the 1960s. To support the risk assessment of chemicals, in the 1980s and 1990s development of toxicity tests was the main issue, including single species tests and also more realistic test systems like model ecosystems and field tests focusing on structural and functional endpoints. In the mean time, awareness grew about issues like bioavailability and routes of exposure, while biochemical endpoints (biomarkers) were proposed as sensitive and potential early-warning tools. In recent years, interactions between different chemicals (mixture toxicity) and between chemical and other stressors attracted scientific interest. With the development of molecular biology, omics tools are gaining increasing interest, while the ecological relevance of exposure and effects is translating into concepts like (chemical) stress ecology, ecological vulnerability and trait-based approaches. This contribution addresses historical developments and focuses on current issues in soil ecotoxicology. It is concluded that soil ecotoxicological risk assessment would benefit from extending the available battery of toxicity tests by including e.g. isopods, by paying more attention to exposure, bioavailability and toxicokinetics, and by developing more insight into the ecology of soil organisms to support better understanding of exposure and long-term consequences of chemical exposure at the individual, population and community level. Ecotoxicogenomics tools may also be helpful in this, but will require considerable further research before they can be applied in the practice of soil ecotoxicological risk assessment. Pensoft Publishers 2012-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3335420/ /pubmed/22536114 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.176.2275 Text en Cornelis A.M. van Gestel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
van Gestel, Cornelis A.M.
Soil ecotoxicology: state of the art and future directions
title Soil ecotoxicology: state of the art and future directions
title_full Soil ecotoxicology: state of the art and future directions
title_fullStr Soil ecotoxicology: state of the art and future directions
title_full_unstemmed Soil ecotoxicology: state of the art and future directions
title_short Soil ecotoxicology: state of the art and future directions
title_sort soil ecotoxicology: state of the art and future directions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22536114
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.176.2275
work_keys_str_mv AT vangestelcornelisam soilecotoxicologystateoftheartandfuturedirections