Cargando…

Management of Latent Tuberculosis Infections in Australia and New Zealand: A Review of Current Practice

Aim: To survey practices in the diagnosis and management of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: Infectious diseases and respiratory physicians and trainees were invited to complete an online questionnaire concerning various aspects of LTBI management. Results:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denholm, Justin T., McBryde, Emma S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22567257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/284028
_version_ 1782230794577641472
author Denholm, Justin T.
McBryde, Emma S.
author_facet Denholm, Justin T.
McBryde, Emma S.
author_sort Denholm, Justin T.
collection PubMed
description Aim: To survey practices in the diagnosis and management of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: Infectious diseases and respiratory physicians and trainees were invited to complete an online questionnaire concerning various aspects of LTBI management. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 126 clinicians self-reporting regular management of LTBI. Respondents were experienced physicians, with 95/126 (75.4%) having managed LTBI for more than 5 years. Forty-seven (37.3%) reported seeing more than 5 patients per month for assessment of LTBI. Substantial variation among clinicians was reported in relation to a number of common clinical scenarios. For instance, while 52/126 (43.7%) informed patients that the incidence of severe hepatotoxicity related to isoniazid monotherapy was 0.1–0.5%, 21/126 (15.7%) thought it was >5%. 36/126 (28.6%) clinicians would proceed with TNF-αtherapy following an indeterminate screening: interferon-γassay, while 78/126 (61.9%) would perform further investigations and 12/126 (9.5%) would initiate isoniazid therapy. Follow-up intervals during therapy varied from 1–3 monthly, with liver function testing performed routinely by 89/126 (70.6%). Conclusion: This study demonstrated a large degree of variation in clinical practice of LTBI management in Australia and New Zealand. Strategies for increasing uniformity of practice are required, including improved guidelines and physician education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3335466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33354662012-05-07 Management of Latent Tuberculosis Infections in Australia and New Zealand: A Review of Current Practice Denholm, Justin T. McBryde, Emma S. Tuberc Res Treat Research Article Aim: To survey practices in the diagnosis and management of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: Infectious diseases and respiratory physicians and trainees were invited to complete an online questionnaire concerning various aspects of LTBI management. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 126 clinicians self-reporting regular management of LTBI. Respondents were experienced physicians, with 95/126 (75.4%) having managed LTBI for more than 5 years. Forty-seven (37.3%) reported seeing more than 5 patients per month for assessment of LTBI. Substantial variation among clinicians was reported in relation to a number of common clinical scenarios. For instance, while 52/126 (43.7%) informed patients that the incidence of severe hepatotoxicity related to isoniazid monotherapy was 0.1–0.5%, 21/126 (15.7%) thought it was >5%. 36/126 (28.6%) clinicians would proceed with TNF-αtherapy following an indeterminate screening: interferon-γassay, while 78/126 (61.9%) would perform further investigations and 12/126 (9.5%) would initiate isoniazid therapy. Follow-up intervals during therapy varied from 1–3 monthly, with liver function testing performed routinely by 89/126 (70.6%). Conclusion: This study demonstrated a large degree of variation in clinical practice of LTBI management in Australia and New Zealand. Strategies for increasing uniformity of practice are required, including improved guidelines and physician education. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3335466/ /pubmed/22567257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/284028 Text en Copyright © 2010 J. T. Denholm and E. S. McBryde. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Denholm, Justin T.
McBryde, Emma S.
Management of Latent Tuberculosis Infections in Australia and New Zealand: A Review of Current Practice
title Management of Latent Tuberculosis Infections in Australia and New Zealand: A Review of Current Practice
title_full Management of Latent Tuberculosis Infections in Australia and New Zealand: A Review of Current Practice
title_fullStr Management of Latent Tuberculosis Infections in Australia and New Zealand: A Review of Current Practice
title_full_unstemmed Management of Latent Tuberculosis Infections in Australia and New Zealand: A Review of Current Practice
title_short Management of Latent Tuberculosis Infections in Australia and New Zealand: A Review of Current Practice
title_sort management of latent tuberculosis infections in australia and new zealand: a review of current practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22567257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/284028
work_keys_str_mv AT denholmjustint managementoflatenttuberculosisinfectionsinaustraliaandnewzealandareviewofcurrentpractice
AT mcbrydeemmas managementoflatenttuberculosisinfectionsinaustraliaandnewzealandareviewofcurrentpractice