Cargando…

Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Training Traditional Birth Attendants to Reduce Neonatal Mortality in the Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Study (LUNESP)

BACKGROUND: The Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project (“LUNESP”) was a cluster randomized, controlled trial that showed that training traditional birth attendants (TBAs) to perform interventions targeting birth asphyxia, hypothermia, and neonatal sepsis reduced all-cause neonatal mortality by 45%. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabin, Lora L., Knapp, Anna B., MacLeod, William B., Phiri-Mazala, Grace, Kasimba, Joshua, Hamer, Davidson H., Gill, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22545117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035560
_version_ 1782230869809823744
author Sabin, Lora L.
Knapp, Anna B.
MacLeod, William B.
Phiri-Mazala, Grace
Kasimba, Joshua
Hamer, Davidson H.
Gill, Christopher J.
author_facet Sabin, Lora L.
Knapp, Anna B.
MacLeod, William B.
Phiri-Mazala, Grace
Kasimba, Joshua
Hamer, Davidson H.
Gill, Christopher J.
author_sort Sabin, Lora L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project (“LUNESP”) was a cluster randomized, controlled trial that showed that training traditional birth attendants (TBAs) to perform interventions targeting birth asphyxia, hypothermia, and neonatal sepsis reduced all-cause neonatal mortality by 45%. This companion analysis was undertaken to analyze intervention costs and cost-effectiveness, and factors that might improve cost-effectiveness. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We calculated LUNESP's financial and economic costs and the economic cost of implementation for a forecasted ten-year program (2011–2020). In each case, we calculated the incremental cost per death avoided and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted in real 2011 US dollars. The forecasted 10-year program analysis included a base case as well as ‘conservative’ and ‘optimistic’ scenarios. Uncertainty was characterized using one-way sensitivity analyses and a multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The estimated financial and economic costs of LUNESP were $118,574 and $127,756, respectively, or $49,469 and $53,550 per year. Fixed costs accounted for nearly 90% of total costs. For the 10-year program, discounted total and annual program costs were $256,455 and $26,834 respectively; for the base case, optimistic, and conservative scenarios, the estimated cost per death avoided was $1,866, $591, and $3,024, and cost per DALY averted was $74, $24, and $120, respectively. Outcomes were robust to variations in local costs, but sensitive to variations in intervention effect size, number of births attended by TBAs, and the extent of foreign consultants' participation. CONCLUSIONS: Based on established guidelines, the strategy of using trained TBAs to reduce neonatal mortality was ‘highly cost effective’. We strongly recommend consideration of this approach for other remote rural populations with limited access to health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3335866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33358662012-04-27 Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Training Traditional Birth Attendants to Reduce Neonatal Mortality in the Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Study (LUNESP) Sabin, Lora L. Knapp, Anna B. MacLeod, William B. Phiri-Mazala, Grace Kasimba, Joshua Hamer, Davidson H. Gill, Christopher J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Project (“LUNESP”) was a cluster randomized, controlled trial that showed that training traditional birth attendants (TBAs) to perform interventions targeting birth asphyxia, hypothermia, and neonatal sepsis reduced all-cause neonatal mortality by 45%. This companion analysis was undertaken to analyze intervention costs and cost-effectiveness, and factors that might improve cost-effectiveness. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We calculated LUNESP's financial and economic costs and the economic cost of implementation for a forecasted ten-year program (2011–2020). In each case, we calculated the incremental cost per death avoided and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted in real 2011 US dollars. The forecasted 10-year program analysis included a base case as well as ‘conservative’ and ‘optimistic’ scenarios. Uncertainty was characterized using one-way sensitivity analyses and a multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The estimated financial and economic costs of LUNESP were $118,574 and $127,756, respectively, or $49,469 and $53,550 per year. Fixed costs accounted for nearly 90% of total costs. For the 10-year program, discounted total and annual program costs were $256,455 and $26,834 respectively; for the base case, optimistic, and conservative scenarios, the estimated cost per death avoided was $1,866, $591, and $3,024, and cost per DALY averted was $74, $24, and $120, respectively. Outcomes were robust to variations in local costs, but sensitive to variations in intervention effect size, number of births attended by TBAs, and the extent of foreign consultants' participation. CONCLUSIONS: Based on established guidelines, the strategy of using trained TBAs to reduce neonatal mortality was ‘highly cost effective’. We strongly recommend consideration of this approach for other remote rural populations with limited access to health care. Public Library of Science 2012-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3335866/ /pubmed/22545117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035560 Text en Sabin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sabin, Lora L.
Knapp, Anna B.
MacLeod, William B.
Phiri-Mazala, Grace
Kasimba, Joshua
Hamer, Davidson H.
Gill, Christopher J.
Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Training Traditional Birth Attendants to Reduce Neonatal Mortality in the Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Study (LUNESP)
title Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Training Traditional Birth Attendants to Reduce Neonatal Mortality in the Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Study (LUNESP)
title_full Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Training Traditional Birth Attendants to Reduce Neonatal Mortality in the Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Study (LUNESP)
title_fullStr Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Training Traditional Birth Attendants to Reduce Neonatal Mortality in the Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Study (LUNESP)
title_full_unstemmed Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Training Traditional Birth Attendants to Reduce Neonatal Mortality in the Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Study (LUNESP)
title_short Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Training Traditional Birth Attendants to Reduce Neonatal Mortality in the Lufwanyama Neonatal Survival Study (LUNESP)
title_sort costs and cost-effectiveness of training traditional birth attendants to reduce neonatal mortality in the lufwanyama neonatal survival study (lunesp)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22545117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035560
work_keys_str_mv AT sabinloral costsandcosteffectivenessoftrainingtraditionalbirthattendantstoreduceneonatalmortalityinthelufwanyamaneonatalsurvivalstudylunesp
AT knappannab costsandcosteffectivenessoftrainingtraditionalbirthattendantstoreduceneonatalmortalityinthelufwanyamaneonatalsurvivalstudylunesp
AT macleodwilliamb costsandcosteffectivenessoftrainingtraditionalbirthattendantstoreduceneonatalmortalityinthelufwanyamaneonatalsurvivalstudylunesp
AT phirimazalagrace costsandcosteffectivenessoftrainingtraditionalbirthattendantstoreduceneonatalmortalityinthelufwanyamaneonatalsurvivalstudylunesp
AT kasimbajoshua costsandcosteffectivenessoftrainingtraditionalbirthattendantstoreduceneonatalmortalityinthelufwanyamaneonatalsurvivalstudylunesp
AT hamerdavidsonh costsandcosteffectivenessoftrainingtraditionalbirthattendantstoreduceneonatalmortalityinthelufwanyamaneonatalsurvivalstudylunesp
AT gillchristopherj costsandcosteffectivenessoftrainingtraditionalbirthattendantstoreduceneonatalmortalityinthelufwanyamaneonatalsurvivalstudylunesp