Cargando…

Robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and IMRT

PURPOSE: To investigate repositioning accuracy in particle radiotherapy in 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT, 3 DOF) for two immobilization devices (Scotchcast masks vs thermoplastic head masks) currently in use at our institution for fractionated radiation therap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, Alexandra D, Winter, Marcus, Kuhn, Sabine P, Debus, Jürgen, Nairz, Olaf, Münter, Marc W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3337272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22458824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-51
_version_ 1782231054392754176
author Jensen, Alexandra D
Winter, Marcus
Kuhn, Sabine P
Debus, Jürgen
Nairz, Olaf
Münter, Marc W
author_facet Jensen, Alexandra D
Winter, Marcus
Kuhn, Sabine P
Debus, Jürgen
Nairz, Olaf
Münter, Marc W
author_sort Jensen, Alexandra D
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate repositioning accuracy in particle radiotherapy in 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT, 3 DOF) for two immobilization devices (Scotchcast masks vs thermoplastic head masks) currently in use at our institution for fractionated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Position verifications in patients treated with carbon ion therapy and IMRT for head and neck malignancies were evaluated. Most patients received combined treatment regimen (IMRT plus carbon ion boost), immobilization was achieved with either Scotchcast or thermoplastic head masks. Position corrections in robotic-based carbon ion therapy allowing 6 DOF were compared to IMRT allowing corrections in 3 DOF for two standard immobilization devices. In total, 838 set-up controls of 38 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Robotic-based position correction including correction of rotations was well tolerated and without discomfort. Standard deviations of translational components were between 0.5 and 0.8 mm for Scotchcast and 0.7 and 1.3 mm for thermoplastic masks in 6 DOF and 1.2 - 1.4 mm and 1.0 - 1.1 mm in 3 DOF respectively. Mean overall displacement vectors were between 2.1 mm (Scotchcast) and 2.9 mm (thermoplastic masks) in 6 DOF and 3.9 - 3.0 mm in 3 DOF respectively. Displacement vectors were lower when correction in 6 DOF was allowed as opposed to 3 DOF only, which was maintained at the traditional action level of > 3 mm for position correction in the pre-on-board imaging era. CONCLUSION: Setup accuracy for both systems was within the expected range. Smaller shifts were required when 6 DOF were available for correction as opposed to 3 DOF. Where highest possible positioning accuracy is required, frequent image guidance is mandatory to achieve best possible plan delivery and maintenance of sharp gradients and optimal normal tissue sparing inherent in carbon ion therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3337272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33372722012-05-02 Robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and IMRT Jensen, Alexandra D Winter, Marcus Kuhn, Sabine P Debus, Jürgen Nairz, Olaf Münter, Marc W Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To investigate repositioning accuracy in particle radiotherapy in 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT, 3 DOF) for two immobilization devices (Scotchcast masks vs thermoplastic head masks) currently in use at our institution for fractionated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Position verifications in patients treated with carbon ion therapy and IMRT for head and neck malignancies were evaluated. Most patients received combined treatment regimen (IMRT plus carbon ion boost), immobilization was achieved with either Scotchcast or thermoplastic head masks. Position corrections in robotic-based carbon ion therapy allowing 6 DOF were compared to IMRT allowing corrections in 3 DOF for two standard immobilization devices. In total, 838 set-up controls of 38 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Robotic-based position correction including correction of rotations was well tolerated and without discomfort. Standard deviations of translational components were between 0.5 and 0.8 mm for Scotchcast and 0.7 and 1.3 mm for thermoplastic masks in 6 DOF and 1.2 - 1.4 mm and 1.0 - 1.1 mm in 3 DOF respectively. Mean overall displacement vectors were between 2.1 mm (Scotchcast) and 2.9 mm (thermoplastic masks) in 6 DOF and 3.9 - 3.0 mm in 3 DOF respectively. Displacement vectors were lower when correction in 6 DOF was allowed as opposed to 3 DOF only, which was maintained at the traditional action level of > 3 mm for position correction in the pre-on-board imaging era. CONCLUSION: Setup accuracy for both systems was within the expected range. Smaller shifts were required when 6 DOF were available for correction as opposed to 3 DOF. Where highest possible positioning accuracy is required, frequent image guidance is mandatory to achieve best possible plan delivery and maintenance of sharp gradients and optimal normal tissue sparing inherent in carbon ion therapy. BioMed Central 2012-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3337272/ /pubmed/22458824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-51 Text en Copyright ©2012 Jensen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jensen, Alexandra D
Winter, Marcus
Kuhn, Sabine P
Debus, Jürgen
Nairz, Olaf
Münter, Marc W
Robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and IMRT
title Robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and IMRT
title_full Robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and IMRT
title_fullStr Robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and IMRT
title_full_unstemmed Robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and IMRT
title_short Robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and IMRT
title_sort robotic-based carbon ion therapy and patient positioning in 6 degrees of freedom: setup accuracy of two standard immobilization devices used in carbon ion therapy and imrt
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3337272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22458824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-51
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenalexandrad roboticbasedcarboniontherapyandpatientpositioningin6degreesoffreedomsetupaccuracyoftwostandardimmobilizationdevicesusedincarboniontherapyandimrt
AT wintermarcus roboticbasedcarboniontherapyandpatientpositioningin6degreesoffreedomsetupaccuracyoftwostandardimmobilizationdevicesusedincarboniontherapyandimrt
AT kuhnsabinep roboticbasedcarboniontherapyandpatientpositioningin6degreesoffreedomsetupaccuracyoftwostandardimmobilizationdevicesusedincarboniontherapyandimrt
AT debusjurgen roboticbasedcarboniontherapyandpatientpositioningin6degreesoffreedomsetupaccuracyoftwostandardimmobilizationdevicesusedincarboniontherapyandimrt
AT nairzolaf roboticbasedcarboniontherapyandpatientpositioningin6degreesoffreedomsetupaccuracyoftwostandardimmobilizationdevicesusedincarboniontherapyandimrt
AT muntermarcw roboticbasedcarboniontherapyandpatientpositioningin6degreesoffreedomsetupaccuracyoftwostandardimmobilizationdevicesusedincarboniontherapyandimrt