Cargando…

Recurrent urethrovesical anastomotic strictures following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a case report

INTRODUCTION: The management of an anastomotic stricture after a radical prostatectomy can become a complex and difficult situation when an artificial urinary sphincter precedes the formation of the stricture. The urethral narrowing does not allow the passage of the routinely used urological instrum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adamakis, Ioannis, Tyritzis, Stavros I, Vasileiou, Ioanna, Katafigiotis, Ioannis, Leotsakos, Ioannis, Fergadaki, Sotiria, Stravodimos, Konstantinos G, Constantinides, Constantinos A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3337822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22472293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-6-94
_version_ 1782231126974136320
author Adamakis, Ioannis
Tyritzis, Stavros I
Vasileiou, Ioanna
Katafigiotis, Ioannis
Leotsakos, Ioannis
Fergadaki, Sotiria
Stravodimos, Konstantinos G
Constantinides, Constantinos A
author_facet Adamakis, Ioannis
Tyritzis, Stavros I
Vasileiou, Ioanna
Katafigiotis, Ioannis
Leotsakos, Ioannis
Fergadaki, Sotiria
Stravodimos, Konstantinos G
Constantinides, Constantinos A
author_sort Adamakis, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The management of an anastomotic stricture after a radical prostatectomy can become a complex and difficult situation when an artificial urinary sphincter precedes the formation of the stricture. The urethral narrowing does not allow the passage of the routinely used urological instruments and no previous reports have suggested alternate approaches. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 68-year-old Greek man diagnosed as having a recurrent anastomotic stricture approximately two years after a radical prostatectomy and three years after the implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter, and propose novel alternate methods of treatment. Our patient was first subjected to stricture incision with the use of a rigid ureteroscope with a holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser fiber, which was followed by a second successful attempt with the use of a pediatric resectoscope. After a one-year follow-up, our patient is doing well, with no evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the management of recurrent urethral strictures following an artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Minimal invasive techniques with the use of small caliber instruments may offer efficient treatment options, diminishing the danger of urethral corrosion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3337822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33378222012-04-27 Recurrent urethrovesical anastomotic strictures following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a case report Adamakis, Ioannis Tyritzis, Stavros I Vasileiou, Ioanna Katafigiotis, Ioannis Leotsakos, Ioannis Fergadaki, Sotiria Stravodimos, Konstantinos G Constantinides, Constantinos A J Med Case Reports Case Report INTRODUCTION: The management of an anastomotic stricture after a radical prostatectomy can become a complex and difficult situation when an artificial urinary sphincter precedes the formation of the stricture. The urethral narrowing does not allow the passage of the routinely used urological instruments and no previous reports have suggested alternate approaches. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 68-year-old Greek man diagnosed as having a recurrent anastomotic stricture approximately two years after a radical prostatectomy and three years after the implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter, and propose novel alternate methods of treatment. Our patient was first subjected to stricture incision with the use of a rigid ureteroscope with a holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser fiber, which was followed by a second successful attempt with the use of a pediatric resectoscope. After a one-year follow-up, our patient is doing well, with no evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the management of recurrent urethral strictures following an artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Minimal invasive techniques with the use of small caliber instruments may offer efficient treatment options, diminishing the danger of urethral corrosion. BioMed Central 2012-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3337822/ /pubmed/22472293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-6-94 Text en Copyright ©2012 Adamakis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Adamakis, Ioannis
Tyritzis, Stavros I
Vasileiou, Ioanna
Katafigiotis, Ioannis
Leotsakos, Ioannis
Fergadaki, Sotiria
Stravodimos, Konstantinos G
Constantinides, Constantinos A
Recurrent urethrovesical anastomotic strictures following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a case report
title Recurrent urethrovesical anastomotic strictures following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a case report
title_full Recurrent urethrovesical anastomotic strictures following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a case report
title_fullStr Recurrent urethrovesical anastomotic strictures following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent urethrovesical anastomotic strictures following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a case report
title_short Recurrent urethrovesical anastomotic strictures following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a case report
title_sort recurrent urethrovesical anastomotic strictures following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3337822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22472293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-6-94
work_keys_str_mv AT adamakisioannis recurrenturethrovesicalanastomoticstricturesfollowingartificialurinarysphincterimplantationacasereport
AT tyritzisstavrosi recurrenturethrovesicalanastomoticstricturesfollowingartificialurinarysphincterimplantationacasereport
AT vasileiouioanna recurrenturethrovesicalanastomoticstricturesfollowingartificialurinarysphincterimplantationacasereport
AT katafigiotisioannis recurrenturethrovesicalanastomoticstricturesfollowingartificialurinarysphincterimplantationacasereport
AT leotsakosioannis recurrenturethrovesicalanastomoticstricturesfollowingartificialurinarysphincterimplantationacasereport
AT fergadakisotiria recurrenturethrovesicalanastomoticstricturesfollowingartificialurinarysphincterimplantationacasereport
AT stravodimoskonstantinosg recurrenturethrovesicalanastomoticstricturesfollowingartificialurinarysphincterimplantationacasereport
AT constantinidesconstantinosa recurrenturethrovesicalanastomoticstricturesfollowingartificialurinarysphincterimplantationacasereport