Cargando…

Comparison between CT Colonography and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Renal Insufficiency

OBJECTIVE: To compare the CT colonography (CTC) and double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) for colonic evaluation in patients with renal insufficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two sequential groups of consecutive patients with renal insufficiency who had a similar risk for colorectal cancer, were examin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Sun-Young, Park, Seong Ho, Lee, Seung Soo, Lee, Ju Hee, Kim, Ah Young, Park, Su-Kil, Han, Duck Jong, Ha, Hyun Kwon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3337865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22563266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.3.290
_version_ 1782231131857354752
author Chung, Sun-Young
Park, Seong Ho
Lee, Seung Soo
Lee, Ju Hee
Kim, Ah Young
Park, Su-Kil
Han, Duck Jong
Ha, Hyun Kwon
author_facet Chung, Sun-Young
Park, Seong Ho
Lee, Seung Soo
Lee, Ju Hee
Kim, Ah Young
Park, Su-Kil
Han, Duck Jong
Ha, Hyun Kwon
author_sort Chung, Sun-Young
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the CT colonography (CTC) and double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) for colonic evaluation in patients with renal insufficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two sequential groups of consecutive patients with renal insufficiency who had a similar risk for colorectal cancer, were examined by DCBE (n = 182; mean ± SD in age, 51 ± 6.4 years) and CTC (n = 176; 50 ± 6.7 years), respectively. CTC was performed after colon cleansing with 250-mL magnesium citrate (n = 87) or 4-L polyethylene glycol (n = 89) and fecal tagging. DCBE was performed after preparation with 250-mL magnesium citrate. Patients with colonic polyps/masses of ≥ 6 mm were subsequently recommended to undergo a colonoscopy. Diagnostic yield and positive predictive value (PPV) for colonic polyps/masses, examination quality, and examination-related serum electrolyte change were retrospectively compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Both the CTC and DCBE were positive for colonic polyps/masses in 28 (16%) of 176 and 11 (6%) of 182 patients, respectively (p = 0.004). Among patients with positive findings, 17 CTC and six DCBE patients subsequently underwent a colonoscopy and yielded a PPV of 88% (15 of 17 patients) and 50% (3 of 6 patients), respectively (p = 0.089). Thirteen patients with adenomatous lesions were detected in the CTC group (adenocarcinoma [n = 1], advanced adenoma [n = 6], and non-advanced adenoma [n = 6]), as compared with two patients (each with adenocarcinoma and advanced adenoma) in the DCBE group (p = 0.003). Six (3%) of 176 CTC and 16 (9%) of 182 DCBE examinations deemed to be inadequate (p = 0.046). Electrolyte changes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with renal insufficiency, CTC has a higher diagnostic yield and a marginally higher PPV for detecting colorectal neoplasia, despite a similar diagnostic yield for adenocarcinoma, and a lower rate of inadequate examinations as compared with DCBE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3337865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33378652012-05-05 Comparison between CT Colonography and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Renal Insufficiency Chung, Sun-Young Park, Seong Ho Lee, Seung Soo Lee, Ju Hee Kim, Ah Young Park, Su-Kil Han, Duck Jong Ha, Hyun Kwon Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the CT colonography (CTC) and double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) for colonic evaluation in patients with renal insufficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two sequential groups of consecutive patients with renal insufficiency who had a similar risk for colorectal cancer, were examined by DCBE (n = 182; mean ± SD in age, 51 ± 6.4 years) and CTC (n = 176; 50 ± 6.7 years), respectively. CTC was performed after colon cleansing with 250-mL magnesium citrate (n = 87) or 4-L polyethylene glycol (n = 89) and fecal tagging. DCBE was performed after preparation with 250-mL magnesium citrate. Patients with colonic polyps/masses of ≥ 6 mm were subsequently recommended to undergo a colonoscopy. Diagnostic yield and positive predictive value (PPV) for colonic polyps/masses, examination quality, and examination-related serum electrolyte change were retrospectively compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Both the CTC and DCBE were positive for colonic polyps/masses in 28 (16%) of 176 and 11 (6%) of 182 patients, respectively (p = 0.004). Among patients with positive findings, 17 CTC and six DCBE patients subsequently underwent a colonoscopy and yielded a PPV of 88% (15 of 17 patients) and 50% (3 of 6 patients), respectively (p = 0.089). Thirteen patients with adenomatous lesions were detected in the CTC group (adenocarcinoma [n = 1], advanced adenoma [n = 6], and non-advanced adenoma [n = 6]), as compared with two patients (each with adenocarcinoma and advanced adenoma) in the DCBE group (p = 0.003). Six (3%) of 176 CTC and 16 (9%) of 182 DCBE examinations deemed to be inadequate (p = 0.046). Electrolyte changes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with renal insufficiency, CTC has a higher diagnostic yield and a marginally higher PPV for detecting colorectal neoplasia, despite a similar diagnostic yield for adenocarcinoma, and a lower rate of inadequate examinations as compared with DCBE. The Korean Society of Radiology 2012 2012-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3337865/ /pubmed/22563266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.3.290 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chung, Sun-Young
Park, Seong Ho
Lee, Seung Soo
Lee, Ju Hee
Kim, Ah Young
Park, Su-Kil
Han, Duck Jong
Ha, Hyun Kwon
Comparison between CT Colonography and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Renal Insufficiency
title Comparison between CT Colonography and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Renal Insufficiency
title_full Comparison between CT Colonography and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Renal Insufficiency
title_fullStr Comparison between CT Colonography and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Renal Insufficiency
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between CT Colonography and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Renal Insufficiency
title_short Comparison between CT Colonography and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Renal Insufficiency
title_sort comparison between ct colonography and double-contrast barium enema for colonic evaluation in patients with renal insufficiency
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3337865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22563266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.3.290
work_keys_str_mv AT chungsunyoung comparisonbetweenctcolonographyanddoublecontrastbariumenemaforcolonicevaluationinpatientswithrenalinsufficiency
AT parkseongho comparisonbetweenctcolonographyanddoublecontrastbariumenemaforcolonicevaluationinpatientswithrenalinsufficiency
AT leeseungsoo comparisonbetweenctcolonographyanddoublecontrastbariumenemaforcolonicevaluationinpatientswithrenalinsufficiency
AT leejuhee comparisonbetweenctcolonographyanddoublecontrastbariumenemaforcolonicevaluationinpatientswithrenalinsufficiency
AT kimahyoung comparisonbetweenctcolonographyanddoublecontrastbariumenemaforcolonicevaluationinpatientswithrenalinsufficiency
AT parksukil comparisonbetweenctcolonographyanddoublecontrastbariumenemaforcolonicevaluationinpatientswithrenalinsufficiency
AT handuckjong comparisonbetweenctcolonographyanddoublecontrastbariumenemaforcolonicevaluationinpatientswithrenalinsufficiency
AT hahyunkwon comparisonbetweenctcolonographyanddoublecontrastbariumenemaforcolonicevaluationinpatientswithrenalinsufficiency