Cargando…

Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Fiducial Marker Implantation for CyberKnife Radiation Therapy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and technical success rate of an ultrasound-guided fiducial marker implantation in preparation for CyberKnife radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 270 percutaneous ultrasound-guided fiducial marker implantations in 77 patients, which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jae Hyun, Hong, Seong Sook, Kim, Jung Hoon, Park, Hyun Jeong, Chang, Yun-Woo, Chang, A Ram, Kwon, Seok-Beom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3337867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22563268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.3.307
_version_ 1782231132321873920
author Kim, Jae Hyun
Hong, Seong Sook
Kim, Jung Hoon
Park, Hyun Jeong
Chang, Yun-Woo
Chang, A Ram
Kwon, Seok-Beom
author_facet Kim, Jae Hyun
Hong, Seong Sook
Kim, Jung Hoon
Park, Hyun Jeong
Chang, Yun-Woo
Chang, A Ram
Kwon, Seok-Beom
author_sort Kim, Jae Hyun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and technical success rate of an ultrasound-guided fiducial marker implantation in preparation for CyberKnife radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 270 percutaneous ultrasound-guided fiducial marker implantations in 77 patients, which were performed from June 2008 through March 2011. Of 270 implantations, 104 were implanted in metastatic lymph nodes, 96 were in the liver, 39 were in the pancreas, and 31 were in the prostate. During and after the implantation, major and minor procedure-related complications were documented. We defined technical success as the implantation enabling adequate treatment planning and CT simulation. RESULTS: The major and minor complication rates were 1% and 21%, respectively. One patient who had an implantation in the liver suffered severe abdominal pain, biloma, and pleural effusion, which were considered as major complication. Abdominal pain was the most common complication in 11 patients (14%). Among nine patients who had markers inserted in the prostate, one had transient hematuria for less than 24 hours, and the other experienced transient voiding difficulty. Of the 270 implantations, 261 were successful (97%). The reasons for unsuccessful implantations included migration of fiducial markers (five implantations, 2%) and failure to discriminate the fiducial markers (three implantations, 1%). Among the unsuccessful implantation cases, six patients required additional procedures (8%). CONCLUSION: The symptomatic complications following ultrasound-guided percutaneous implantation of fiducial markers are relatively low. However, careful consideration of the relatively higher rate of migration and discrimination failure is needed when performing ultrasound-guided percutaneous implantations of fiducial markers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3337867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33378672012-05-05 Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Fiducial Marker Implantation for CyberKnife Radiation Therapy Kim, Jae Hyun Hong, Seong Sook Kim, Jung Hoon Park, Hyun Jeong Chang, Yun-Woo Chang, A Ram Kwon, Seok-Beom Korean J Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and technical success rate of an ultrasound-guided fiducial marker implantation in preparation for CyberKnife radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 270 percutaneous ultrasound-guided fiducial marker implantations in 77 patients, which were performed from June 2008 through March 2011. Of 270 implantations, 104 were implanted in metastatic lymph nodes, 96 were in the liver, 39 were in the pancreas, and 31 were in the prostate. During and after the implantation, major and minor procedure-related complications were documented. We defined technical success as the implantation enabling adequate treatment planning and CT simulation. RESULTS: The major and minor complication rates were 1% and 21%, respectively. One patient who had an implantation in the liver suffered severe abdominal pain, biloma, and pleural effusion, which were considered as major complication. Abdominal pain was the most common complication in 11 patients (14%). Among nine patients who had markers inserted in the prostate, one had transient hematuria for less than 24 hours, and the other experienced transient voiding difficulty. Of the 270 implantations, 261 were successful (97%). The reasons for unsuccessful implantations included migration of fiducial markers (five implantations, 2%) and failure to discriminate the fiducial markers (three implantations, 1%). Among the unsuccessful implantation cases, six patients required additional procedures (8%). CONCLUSION: The symptomatic complications following ultrasound-guided percutaneous implantation of fiducial markers are relatively low. However, careful consideration of the relatively higher rate of migration and discrimination failure is needed when performing ultrasound-guided percutaneous implantations of fiducial markers. The Korean Society of Radiology 2012 2012-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3337867/ /pubmed/22563268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.3.307 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Jae Hyun
Hong, Seong Sook
Kim, Jung Hoon
Park, Hyun Jeong
Chang, Yun-Woo
Chang, A Ram
Kwon, Seok-Beom
Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Fiducial Marker Implantation for CyberKnife Radiation Therapy
title Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Fiducial Marker Implantation for CyberKnife Radiation Therapy
title_full Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Fiducial Marker Implantation for CyberKnife Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Fiducial Marker Implantation for CyberKnife Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Fiducial Marker Implantation for CyberKnife Radiation Therapy
title_short Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Fiducial Marker Implantation for CyberKnife Radiation Therapy
title_sort safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided fiducial marker implantation for cyberknife radiation therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3337867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22563268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.3.307
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjaehyun safetyandefficacyofultrasoundguidedfiducialmarkerimplantationforcyberkniferadiationtherapy
AT hongseongsook safetyandefficacyofultrasoundguidedfiducialmarkerimplantationforcyberkniferadiationtherapy
AT kimjunghoon safetyandefficacyofultrasoundguidedfiducialmarkerimplantationforcyberkniferadiationtherapy
AT parkhyunjeong safetyandefficacyofultrasoundguidedfiducialmarkerimplantationforcyberkniferadiationtherapy
AT changyunwoo safetyandefficacyofultrasoundguidedfiducialmarkerimplantationforcyberkniferadiationtherapy
AT changaram safetyandefficacyofultrasoundguidedfiducialmarkerimplantationforcyberkniferadiationtherapy
AT kwonseokbeom safetyandefficacyofultrasoundguidedfiducialmarkerimplantationforcyberkniferadiationtherapy