Cargando…

Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates aberrant DNA methylation is involved in gastric tumourigenesis, suggesting it may be a useful clinical biomarker for the disease. The aim of this study was to consolidate and summarize published data on the potential of methylation in gastric cancer (GC) r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sapari, Nur Sabrina, Loh, Marie, Vaithilingam, Aparna, Soong, Richie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3338684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036275
_version_ 1782231240452079616
author Sapari, Nur Sabrina
Loh, Marie
Vaithilingam, Aparna
Soong, Richie
author_facet Sapari, Nur Sabrina
Loh, Marie
Vaithilingam, Aparna
Soong, Richie
author_sort Sapari, Nur Sabrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates aberrant DNA methylation is involved in gastric tumourigenesis, suggesting it may be a useful clinical biomarker for the disease. The aim of this study was to consolidate and summarize published data on the potential of methylation in gastric cancer (GC) risk prediction, prognostication and prediction of treatment response. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified from PubMed using a systematic search approach. Results were summarized by meta-analysis. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios were computed for each methylation event assuming the random-effects model. RESULTS: A review of 589 retrieved publications identified 415 relevant articles, including 143 case-control studies on gene methylation of 142 individual genes in GC clinical samples. A total of 77 genes were significantly differentially methylated between tumour and normal gastric tissue from GC subjects, of which data on 62 was derived from single studies. Methylation of 15, 4 and 7 genes in normal gastric tissue, plasma and serum respectively was significantly different in frequency between GC and non-cancer subjects. A prognostic significance was reported for 18 genes and predictive significance was reported for p16 methylation, although many inconsistent findings were also observed. No bias due to assay, use of fixed tissue or CpG sites analysed was detected, however a slight bias towards publication of positive findings was observed. CONCLUSIONS: DNA methylation is a promising biomarker for GC risk prediction and prognostication. Further focused validation of candidate methylation markers in independent cohorts is required to develop its clinical potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3338684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33386842012-05-03 Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Sapari, Nur Sabrina Loh, Marie Vaithilingam, Aparna Soong, Richie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates aberrant DNA methylation is involved in gastric tumourigenesis, suggesting it may be a useful clinical biomarker for the disease. The aim of this study was to consolidate and summarize published data on the potential of methylation in gastric cancer (GC) risk prediction, prognostication and prediction of treatment response. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified from PubMed using a systematic search approach. Results were summarized by meta-analysis. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios were computed for each methylation event assuming the random-effects model. RESULTS: A review of 589 retrieved publications identified 415 relevant articles, including 143 case-control studies on gene methylation of 142 individual genes in GC clinical samples. A total of 77 genes were significantly differentially methylated between tumour and normal gastric tissue from GC subjects, of which data on 62 was derived from single studies. Methylation of 15, 4 and 7 genes in normal gastric tissue, plasma and serum respectively was significantly different in frequency between GC and non-cancer subjects. A prognostic significance was reported for 18 genes and predictive significance was reported for p16 methylation, although many inconsistent findings were also observed. No bias due to assay, use of fixed tissue or CpG sites analysed was detected, however a slight bias towards publication of positive findings was observed. CONCLUSIONS: DNA methylation is a promising biomarker for GC risk prediction and prognostication. Further focused validation of candidate methylation markers in independent cohorts is required to develop its clinical potential. Public Library of Science 2012-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3338684/ /pubmed/22558417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036275 Text en Sapari et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sapari, Nur Sabrina
Loh, Marie
Vaithilingam, Aparna
Soong, Richie
Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort clinical potential of dna methylation in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3338684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036275
work_keys_str_mv AT saparinursabrina clinicalpotentialofdnamethylationingastriccancerametaanalysis
AT lohmarie clinicalpotentialofdnamethylationingastriccancerametaanalysis
AT vaithilingamaparna clinicalpotentialofdnamethylationingastriccancerametaanalysis
AT soongrichie clinicalpotentialofdnamethylationingastriccancerametaanalysis