Cargando…

Binocular Coordination: Reading Stereoscopic Sentences in Depth

The present study employs a stereoscopic manipulation to present sentences in three dimensions to subjects as they read for comprehension. Subjects read sentences with (a) no depth cues, (b) a monocular depth cue that implied the sentence loomed out of the screen (i.e., increasing retinal size), (c)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schotter, Elizabeth R., Blythe, Hazel I., Kirkby, Julie A., Rayner, Keith, Holliman, Nicolas S., Liversedge, Simon P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3338722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035608
_version_ 1782231249194057728
author Schotter, Elizabeth R.
Blythe, Hazel I.
Kirkby, Julie A.
Rayner, Keith
Holliman, Nicolas S.
Liversedge, Simon P.
author_facet Schotter, Elizabeth R.
Blythe, Hazel I.
Kirkby, Julie A.
Rayner, Keith
Holliman, Nicolas S.
Liversedge, Simon P.
author_sort Schotter, Elizabeth R.
collection PubMed
description The present study employs a stereoscopic manipulation to present sentences in three dimensions to subjects as they read for comprehension. Subjects read sentences with (a) no depth cues, (b) a monocular depth cue that implied the sentence loomed out of the screen (i.e., increasing retinal size), (c) congruent monocular and binocular (retinal disparity) depth cues (i.e., both implied the sentence loomed out of the screen) and (d) incongruent monocular and binocular depth cues (i.e., the monocular cue implied the sentence loomed out of the screen and the binocular cue implied it receded behind the screen). Reading efficiency was mostly unaffected, suggesting that reading in three dimensions is similar to reading in two dimensions. Importantly, fixation disparity was driven by retinal disparity; fixations were significantly more crossed as readers progressed through the sentence in the congruent condition and significantly more uncrossed in the incongruent condition. We conclude that disparity depth cues are used on-line to drive binocular coordination during reading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3338722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33387222012-05-03 Binocular Coordination: Reading Stereoscopic Sentences in Depth Schotter, Elizabeth R. Blythe, Hazel I. Kirkby, Julie A. Rayner, Keith Holliman, Nicolas S. Liversedge, Simon P. PLoS One Research Article The present study employs a stereoscopic manipulation to present sentences in three dimensions to subjects as they read for comprehension. Subjects read sentences with (a) no depth cues, (b) a monocular depth cue that implied the sentence loomed out of the screen (i.e., increasing retinal size), (c) congruent monocular and binocular (retinal disparity) depth cues (i.e., both implied the sentence loomed out of the screen) and (d) incongruent monocular and binocular depth cues (i.e., the monocular cue implied the sentence loomed out of the screen and the binocular cue implied it receded behind the screen). Reading efficiency was mostly unaffected, suggesting that reading in three dimensions is similar to reading in two dimensions. Importantly, fixation disparity was driven by retinal disparity; fixations were significantly more crossed as readers progressed through the sentence in the congruent condition and significantly more uncrossed in the incongruent condition. We conclude that disparity depth cues are used on-line to drive binocular coordination during reading. Public Library of Science 2012-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3338722/ /pubmed/22558174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035608 Text en Schotter et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schotter, Elizabeth R.
Blythe, Hazel I.
Kirkby, Julie A.
Rayner, Keith
Holliman, Nicolas S.
Liversedge, Simon P.
Binocular Coordination: Reading Stereoscopic Sentences in Depth
title Binocular Coordination: Reading Stereoscopic Sentences in Depth
title_full Binocular Coordination: Reading Stereoscopic Sentences in Depth
title_fullStr Binocular Coordination: Reading Stereoscopic Sentences in Depth
title_full_unstemmed Binocular Coordination: Reading Stereoscopic Sentences in Depth
title_short Binocular Coordination: Reading Stereoscopic Sentences in Depth
title_sort binocular coordination: reading stereoscopic sentences in depth
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3338722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035608
work_keys_str_mv AT schotterelizabethr binocularcoordinationreadingstereoscopicsentencesindepth
AT blythehazeli binocularcoordinationreadingstereoscopicsentencesindepth
AT kirkbyjuliea binocularcoordinationreadingstereoscopicsentencesindepth
AT raynerkeith binocularcoordinationreadingstereoscopicsentencesindepth
AT hollimannicolass binocularcoordinationreadingstereoscopicsentencesindepth
AT liversedgesimonp binocularcoordinationreadingstereoscopicsentencesindepth