Cargando…

The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Cervical disc arthroplasty is being used as an alternative degenerative disc disease treatment with fusion of the cervical spine in order to preserve motion. However, whether replacement arthoplasty in the spine achieves its primary patient centered objective of lowering the frequency of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Baohui, Li, Haopeng, Zhang, Ting, He, Xijing, Xu, Siyue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3338823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035032
_version_ 1782231272262729728
author Yang, Baohui
Li, Haopeng
Zhang, Ting
He, Xijing
Xu, Siyue
author_facet Yang, Baohui
Li, Haopeng
Zhang, Ting
He, Xijing
Xu, Siyue
author_sort Yang, Baohui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical disc arthroplasty is being used as an alternative degenerative disc disease treatment with fusion of the cervical spine in order to preserve motion. However, whether replacement arthoplasty in the spine achieves its primary patient centered objective of lowering the frequency of adjacent segment degeneration is not verified yet. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a meta-analysis according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration using databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase. The inclusion criteria were: 1) Randomized, controlled study of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine involving single segment or double segments using Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as controls; 2) A minimum of two-year follow-up using imaging and clinical analyses; 3) Definite diagnostic evidences for “adjacent segment degeneration” and “adjacent segment disease”; 4) At least a minimum of 30 patients per population. Two authors independently selected trials; assessed methodological quality, extracted data and the results were pooled. RESULTS: No study has specifically compared the results of adjacent segment degenerative; Two papers describing 140 patients with 162 symptomatic cervical segment disorders and compared the rate of postoperative adjacent segment disease development between CDA and ACDF treatments, three publications describing the rate of adjacent-segment surgery including 1273 patients with symptomatic cervical segments. The result of the meta-analysis indicates that there were fewer the rate of adjacent segment disease and the rate for adjacent-segment surgery comparing CDA with ACDF, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Based on available evidence, it cannot be concluded, that CDA can significantly reduce the postoperative rate of the adjacent segment degenerative and adjacent segment disease. However, due to some limitations, the results of this meta-analysis should be cautiously accepted, and further studies are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3338823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33388232012-05-03 The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Yang, Baohui Li, Haopeng Zhang, Ting He, Xijing Xu, Siyue PLoS One Review BACKGROUND: Cervical disc arthroplasty is being used as an alternative degenerative disc disease treatment with fusion of the cervical spine in order to preserve motion. However, whether replacement arthoplasty in the spine achieves its primary patient centered objective of lowering the frequency of adjacent segment degeneration is not verified yet. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a meta-analysis according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration using databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase. The inclusion criteria were: 1) Randomized, controlled study of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine involving single segment or double segments using Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as controls; 2) A minimum of two-year follow-up using imaging and clinical analyses; 3) Definite diagnostic evidences for “adjacent segment degeneration” and “adjacent segment disease”; 4) At least a minimum of 30 patients per population. Two authors independently selected trials; assessed methodological quality, extracted data and the results were pooled. RESULTS: No study has specifically compared the results of adjacent segment degenerative; Two papers describing 140 patients with 162 symptomatic cervical segment disorders and compared the rate of postoperative adjacent segment disease development between CDA and ACDF treatments, three publications describing the rate of adjacent-segment surgery including 1273 patients with symptomatic cervical segments. The result of the meta-analysis indicates that there were fewer the rate of adjacent segment disease and the rate for adjacent-segment surgery comparing CDA with ACDF, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Based on available evidence, it cannot be concluded, that CDA can significantly reduce the postoperative rate of the adjacent segment degenerative and adjacent segment disease. However, due to some limitations, the results of this meta-analysis should be cautiously accepted, and further studies are needed. Public Library of Science 2012-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3338823/ /pubmed/22558112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035032 Text en Yang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Yang, Baohui
Li, Haopeng
Zhang, Ting
He, Xijing
Xu, Siyue
The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (cda): a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3338823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22558112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035032
work_keys_str_mv AT yangbaohui theincidenceofadjacentsegmentdegenerationaftercervicaldiscarthroplastycdaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lihaopeng theincidenceofadjacentsegmentdegenerationaftercervicaldiscarthroplastycdaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangting theincidenceofadjacentsegmentdegenerationaftercervicaldiscarthroplastycdaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hexijing theincidenceofadjacentsegmentdegenerationaftercervicaldiscarthroplastycdaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xusiyue theincidenceofadjacentsegmentdegenerationaftercervicaldiscarthroplastycdaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yangbaohui incidenceofadjacentsegmentdegenerationaftercervicaldiscarthroplastycdaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lihaopeng incidenceofadjacentsegmentdegenerationaftercervicaldiscarthroplastycdaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangting incidenceofadjacentsegmentdegenerationaftercervicaldiscarthroplastycdaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hexijing incidenceofadjacentsegmentdegenerationaftercervicaldiscarthroplastycdaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xusiyue incidenceofadjacentsegmentdegenerationaftercervicaldiscarthroplastycdaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials