Cargando…

Effect of the regional variability of dentinal substrate and modes of application of adhesive systems on the mechanical properties of the adhesive layer

AIM: This study assessed the effect of the dentin depth and the application mode on the hardness and elastic modulus of the adhesive layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal surfaces of 48 caries-free human third molars were removed, at two levels: Superficial and deep dentin. For each type of surface...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pupo, Yasmine Mendes, Michél, Milton Domingos, Gomes, Osnara Maria Mongruel, Lepienski, Carlos Maurício, Gomes, João Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557810
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.94580
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: This study assessed the effect of the dentin depth and the application mode on the hardness and elastic modulus of the adhesive layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal surfaces of 48 caries-free human third molars were removed, at two levels: Superficial and deep dentin. For each type of surface, the test specimens were randomly divided into groups which underwent the application: A conventional two-step adhesive system (Adper™ Single Bond [SB]) and self-etch adhesives system (Adper™ SE Plus [SE] and AdheSE(®) [AD]). The adhesives applied were active or passive. Composite build-ups were constructed incrementally. The teeth were sectioned, embedded, and polished. The nanoindentation test was performed in the adhesive layer. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests. RESULTS: In the adhesive layer, the higher hardness (0.307 ± 0.006 GPa) and elastic modulus (4.796 ± 0.165 GPa) of SE were obtained in superficial dentin in passive application. The elastic modulus of SE (4.115 ± 0.098 GPa) was lowest in active application in superficial dentin. The active application significantly increased the hardness of the SB in the deep dentin (0.011 ± 0.314 GPa) compared the superficial dentin (0.280 ± 0.010 GPa). For the AD, only the mode of application was statistically significant (P=0.0041) for the hardness, active application (0.289 ± 0.015 GPa) being higher than passive application (0.261 ± 0.013 GPa) (P=0.0042) in deep dentin. CONCLUSION: The experimental results reveal that the mechanical properties were influenced for the application mode of adhesive systems and dentin depth.