Cargando…

Evaluation of gingival microleakage of class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts: An in vitro study

AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of glass and polyethylene fiber inserts and flowable composite as a liner on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations with gingival margins on root surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class II slots were prepared on both the proximal sides of thirty fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basavanna, RS, Garg, Anish, Kapur, Ravi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.94590
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of glass and polyethylene fiber inserts and flowable composite as a liner on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations with gingival margins on root surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class II slots were prepared on both the proximal sides of thirty freshly extracted mandibular molars and were divided into six groups, according to the type of fiber insert and use of flowable composite (Filtek Z350) as a liner. Filtek P-60 (3M/ESPE) posterior composite was used to restore all cavities. The specimens were thermocycled and stained with 2% Basic Fuchsin dye, and sectioned to evaluate the dye penetration under Stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was done using Kruskalwallis test and Mann whitney U test. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: This study showed that, fiber insert groups, with or without flowable liner, had reduced microleakage scores as compared to the control groups. However, statistically no significant difference was found between the groups with fiber inserts. Less microleakage was seen in Group IV (With flowable liner and without Fiber inserts) as compared to Group I (Without flowable liner and Fiber inserts).