Cargando…
Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants
This article summarizes current knowledge concerning the characterization of prostatic edema and intra-prostatic seed movement as these relate to dosimetry of permanent prostate implants, and reports the initial application to clinical data of a new edema model used in calculating pre- and post-impl...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557797 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.94742 |
_version_ | 1782231316667826176 |
---|---|
author | Sloboda, Ron S. Usmani, N. Monajemi, T. T. Liu, D. M-C |
author_facet | Sloboda, Ron S. Usmani, N. Monajemi, T. T. Liu, D. M-C |
author_sort | Sloboda, Ron S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article summarizes current knowledge concerning the characterization of prostatic edema and intra-prostatic seed movement as these relate to dosimetry of permanent prostate implants, and reports the initial application to clinical data of a new edema model used in calculating pre- and post-implant dose distributions. Published edema magnitude and half-life parameters span a broad range depending on implant technique and measurement uncertainty, hence clinically applicable values should be determined locally. Observed intra-prostatic seed movements appear to be associated with particular aspects of implant technique and could be minimized by technique modification. Using an extended AAPM TG-43 formalism incorporating the new edema model, relative dose error RE associated with neglecting edema was calculated for three I-125 seed implants (18.9 cc, 37.6 cc, 60.2 cc) performed at our center. Pre- and post-plan RE average values and ranges in a 50 × 50 × 50 mm(3) calculation volume were similar at ~2% and ~0–3.5%, respectively, for all three implants; however, the spatial distribution of RE varied for different seed configurations. Post-plan values of D90 and V100 for prostate were reduced by ~2% and ~1%, respectively. In cases where RE is not clinically negligible as a consequence of large edema magnitude and / or use of Pd-103 seeds, the dose calculation method demonstrated here can be applied to account for edema explicitly and there by improve the accuracy of clinical dose estimates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3339147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33391472012-05-03 Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants Sloboda, Ron S. Usmani, N. Monajemi, T. T. Liu, D. M-C J Med Phys Original Article This article summarizes current knowledge concerning the characterization of prostatic edema and intra-prostatic seed movement as these relate to dosimetry of permanent prostate implants, and reports the initial application to clinical data of a new edema model used in calculating pre- and post-implant dose distributions. Published edema magnitude and half-life parameters span a broad range depending on implant technique and measurement uncertainty, hence clinically applicable values should be determined locally. Observed intra-prostatic seed movements appear to be associated with particular aspects of implant technique and could be minimized by technique modification. Using an extended AAPM TG-43 formalism incorporating the new edema model, relative dose error RE associated with neglecting edema was calculated for three I-125 seed implants (18.9 cc, 37.6 cc, 60.2 cc) performed at our center. Pre- and post-plan RE average values and ranges in a 50 × 50 × 50 mm(3) calculation volume were similar at ~2% and ~0–3.5%, respectively, for all three implants; however, the spatial distribution of RE varied for different seed configurations. Post-plan values of D90 and V100 for prostate were reduced by ~2% and ~1%, respectively. In cases where RE is not clinically negligible as a consequence of large edema magnitude and / or use of Pd-103 seeds, the dose calculation method demonstrated here can be applied to account for edema explicitly and there by improve the accuracy of clinical dose estimates. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3339147/ /pubmed/22557797 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.94742 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sloboda, Ron S. Usmani, N. Monajemi, T. T. Liu, D. M-C Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants |
title | Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants |
title_full | Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants |
title_fullStr | Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants |
title_short | Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants |
title_sort | impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557797 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.94742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slobodarons impactofedemaandseedmovementonthedosimetryofprostateseedimplants AT usmanin impactofedemaandseedmovementonthedosimetryofprostateseedimplants AT monajemitt impactofedemaandseedmovementonthedosimetryofprostateseedimplants AT liudmc impactofedemaandseedmovementonthedosimetryofprostateseedimplants |