Cargando…

Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants

This article summarizes current knowledge concerning the characterization of prostatic edema and intra-prostatic seed movement as these relate to dosimetry of permanent prostate implants, and reports the initial application to clinical data of a new edema model used in calculating pre- and post-impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sloboda, Ron S., Usmani, N., Monajemi, T. T., Liu, D. M-C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557797
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.94742
_version_ 1782231316667826176
author Sloboda, Ron S.
Usmani, N.
Monajemi, T. T.
Liu, D. M-C
author_facet Sloboda, Ron S.
Usmani, N.
Monajemi, T. T.
Liu, D. M-C
author_sort Sloboda, Ron S.
collection PubMed
description This article summarizes current knowledge concerning the characterization of prostatic edema and intra-prostatic seed movement as these relate to dosimetry of permanent prostate implants, and reports the initial application to clinical data of a new edema model used in calculating pre- and post-implant dose distributions. Published edema magnitude and half-life parameters span a broad range depending on implant technique and measurement uncertainty, hence clinically applicable values should be determined locally. Observed intra-prostatic seed movements appear to be associated with particular aspects of implant technique and could be minimized by technique modification. Using an extended AAPM TG-43 formalism incorporating the new edema model, relative dose error RE associated with neglecting edema was calculated for three I-125 seed implants (18.9 cc, 37.6 cc, 60.2 cc) performed at our center. Pre- and post-plan RE average values and ranges in a 50 × 50 × 50 mm(3) calculation volume were similar at ~2% and ~0–3.5%, respectively, for all three implants; however, the spatial distribution of RE varied for different seed configurations. Post-plan values of D90 and V100 for prostate were reduced by ~2% and ~1%, respectively. In cases where RE is not clinically negligible as a consequence of large edema magnitude and / or use of Pd-103 seeds, the dose calculation method demonstrated here can be applied to account for edema explicitly and there by improve the accuracy of clinical dose estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3339147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33391472012-05-03 Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants Sloboda, Ron S. Usmani, N. Monajemi, T. T. Liu, D. M-C J Med Phys Original Article This article summarizes current knowledge concerning the characterization of prostatic edema and intra-prostatic seed movement as these relate to dosimetry of permanent prostate implants, and reports the initial application to clinical data of a new edema model used in calculating pre- and post-implant dose distributions. Published edema magnitude and half-life parameters span a broad range depending on implant technique and measurement uncertainty, hence clinically applicable values should be determined locally. Observed intra-prostatic seed movements appear to be associated with particular aspects of implant technique and could be minimized by technique modification. Using an extended AAPM TG-43 formalism incorporating the new edema model, relative dose error RE associated with neglecting edema was calculated for three I-125 seed implants (18.9 cc, 37.6 cc, 60.2 cc) performed at our center. Pre- and post-plan RE average values and ranges in a 50 × 50 × 50 mm(3) calculation volume were similar at ~2% and ~0–3.5%, respectively, for all three implants; however, the spatial distribution of RE varied for different seed configurations. Post-plan values of D90 and V100 for prostate were reduced by ~2% and ~1%, respectively. In cases where RE is not clinically negligible as a consequence of large edema magnitude and / or use of Pd-103 seeds, the dose calculation method demonstrated here can be applied to account for edema explicitly and there by improve the accuracy of clinical dose estimates. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3339147/ /pubmed/22557797 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.94742 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sloboda, Ron S.
Usmani, N.
Monajemi, T. T.
Liu, D. M-C
Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants
title Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants
title_full Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants
title_fullStr Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants
title_full_unstemmed Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants
title_short Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants
title_sort impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22557797
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.94742
work_keys_str_mv AT slobodarons impactofedemaandseedmovementonthedosimetryofprostateseedimplants
AT usmanin impactofedemaandseedmovementonthedosimetryofprostateseedimplants
AT monajemitt impactofedemaandseedmovementonthedosimetryofprostateseedimplants
AT liudmc impactofedemaandseedmovementonthedosimetryofprostateseedimplants