Cargando…

Viewing Cognitive Conflicts as Dilemmas: Implications for Mental Health

The idea that internal conflicts play a significant role in mental health has been extensively addressed in various psychological traditions, including personal construct theory. In the context of the latter, several measures of conflict have been operationalized using the Repertory Grid Technique (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feixas, Guillem, Saúl, Luis Angel, Ávila-Espada, Alejandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22629109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10720530802675755
_version_ 1782231379334922240
author Feixas, Guillem
Saúl, Luis Angel
Ávila-Espada, Alejandro
author_facet Feixas, Guillem
Saúl, Luis Angel
Ávila-Espada, Alejandro
author_sort Feixas, Guillem
collection PubMed
description The idea that internal conflicts play a significant role in mental health has been extensively addressed in various psychological traditions, including personal construct theory. In the context of the latter, several measures of conflict have been operationalized using the Repertory Grid Technique (RGT). All of them capture the notion that change, although desirable from the viewpoint of a given set of constructs, becomes undesirable from the perspective of other constructs. The goal of this study is to explore the presence of cognitive conflicts in a clinical sample (n = 284) and compare it to a control sample (n = 322). It is also meant to clarify which among the different types of conflict studied provides a greater clinical value and to investigate its relationship to symptom severity (SCL-90-R). Of the types of cognitive conflict studied, implicative dilemmas were the only ones to discriminate between clinical and nonclinical samples. These dilemmas were found in 34% of the nonclinical sample and in 53% of the clinical sample. Participants with implicative dilemmas showed higher symptom severity, and those from the clinical sample displayed a higher frequency of dilemmas than those from the nonclinical sample.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3339575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33395752012-05-22 Viewing Cognitive Conflicts as Dilemmas: Implications for Mental Health Feixas, Guillem Saúl, Luis Angel Ávila-Espada, Alejandro J Constr Psychol Research Article The idea that internal conflicts play a significant role in mental health has been extensively addressed in various psychological traditions, including personal construct theory. In the context of the latter, several measures of conflict have been operationalized using the Repertory Grid Technique (RGT). All of them capture the notion that change, although desirable from the viewpoint of a given set of constructs, becomes undesirable from the perspective of other constructs. The goal of this study is to explore the presence of cognitive conflicts in a clinical sample (n = 284) and compare it to a control sample (n = 322). It is also meant to clarify which among the different types of conflict studied provides a greater clinical value and to investigate its relationship to symptom severity (SCL-90-R). Of the types of cognitive conflict studied, implicative dilemmas were the only ones to discriminate between clinical and nonclinical samples. These dilemmas were found in 34% of the nonclinical sample and in 53% of the clinical sample. Participants with implicative dilemmas showed higher symptom severity, and those from the clinical sample displayed a higher frequency of dilemmas than those from the nonclinical sample. Taylor & Francis 2009-02-18 2009-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3339575/ /pubmed/22629109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10720530802675755 Text en © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feixas, Guillem
Saúl, Luis Angel
Ávila-Espada, Alejandro
Viewing Cognitive Conflicts as Dilemmas: Implications for Mental Health
title Viewing Cognitive Conflicts as Dilemmas: Implications for Mental Health
title_full Viewing Cognitive Conflicts as Dilemmas: Implications for Mental Health
title_fullStr Viewing Cognitive Conflicts as Dilemmas: Implications for Mental Health
title_full_unstemmed Viewing Cognitive Conflicts as Dilemmas: Implications for Mental Health
title_short Viewing Cognitive Conflicts as Dilemmas: Implications for Mental Health
title_sort viewing cognitive conflicts as dilemmas: implications for mental health
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22629109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10720530802675755
work_keys_str_mv AT feixasguillem viewingcognitiveconflictsasdilemmasimplicationsformentalhealth
AT saulluisangel viewingcognitiveconflictsasdilemmasimplicationsformentalhealth
AT avilaespadaalejandro viewingcognitiveconflictsasdilemmasimplicationsformentalhealth