Cargando…

Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland

BACKGROUND: Genetic typing data are a potentially powerful resource for determining how infection is acquired. In this paper MLST typing was used to distinguish the routes and risks of infection of humans with Campylobacter jejuni from poultry and ruminant sources METHODS: C. jejuni samples from ani...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bessell, Paul R, Rotariu, Ovidiu, Innocent, Giles T, Smith-Palmer, Alison, Strachan, Norval JC, Forbes, Ken J, Cowden, John M, Reid, Stuart WJ, Matthews, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3340322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22462563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-80
_version_ 1782231447694737408
author Bessell, Paul R
Rotariu, Ovidiu
Innocent, Giles T
Smith-Palmer, Alison
Strachan, Norval JC
Forbes, Ken J
Cowden, John M
Reid, Stuart WJ
Matthews, Louise
author_facet Bessell, Paul R
Rotariu, Ovidiu
Innocent, Giles T
Smith-Palmer, Alison
Strachan, Norval JC
Forbes, Ken J
Cowden, John M
Reid, Stuart WJ
Matthews, Louise
author_sort Bessell, Paul R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genetic typing data are a potentially powerful resource for determining how infection is acquired. In this paper MLST typing was used to distinguish the routes and risks of infection of humans with Campylobacter jejuni from poultry and ruminant sources METHODS: C. jejuni samples from animal and environmental sources and from reported human cases confirmed between June 2005 and September 2006 were typed using MLST. The STRUCTURE software was used to assign the specific sequence types of the sporadic human cases to a particular source. We then used mixed case-case logistic regression analysis to compare the risk factors for being infected with C. jejuni from different sources. RESULTS: A total of 1,599 (46.3%) cases were assigned to poultry, 1,070 (31.0%) to ruminant and 67 (1.9%) to wild bird sources; the remaining 715 (20.7%) did not have a source that could be assigned with a probability of greater than 0.95. Compared to ruminant sources, cases attributed to poultry sources were typically among adults (odds ratio (OR) = 1.497, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.211, 1.852), not among males (OR = 0.834, 95% CIs = 0.712, 0.977), in areas with population density of greater than 500 people/km(2 )(OR = 1.213, 95% CIs = 1.030, 1.431), reported in the winter (OR = 1.272, 95% CIs = 1.067, 1.517) and had undertaken recent overseas travel (OR = 1.618, 95% CIs = 1.056, 2.481). The poultry assigned strains had a similar epidemiology to the unassigned strains, with the exception of a significantly higher likelihood of reporting overseas travel in unassigned strains. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than estimate relative risks for acquiring infection, our analyses show that individuals acquire C. jejuni infection from different sources have different associated risk factors. By enhancing our ability to identify at-risk groups and the times at which these groups are likely to be at risk, this work allows public health messages to be targeted more effectively. The rapidly increasing capacity to conduct genetic typing of pathogens makes such traced epidemiological analysis more accessible and has the potential to substantially enhance epidemiological risk factor studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3340322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33403222012-05-01 Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland Bessell, Paul R Rotariu, Ovidiu Innocent, Giles T Smith-Palmer, Alison Strachan, Norval JC Forbes, Ken J Cowden, John M Reid, Stuart WJ Matthews, Louise BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Genetic typing data are a potentially powerful resource for determining how infection is acquired. In this paper MLST typing was used to distinguish the routes and risks of infection of humans with Campylobacter jejuni from poultry and ruminant sources METHODS: C. jejuni samples from animal and environmental sources and from reported human cases confirmed between June 2005 and September 2006 were typed using MLST. The STRUCTURE software was used to assign the specific sequence types of the sporadic human cases to a particular source. We then used mixed case-case logistic regression analysis to compare the risk factors for being infected with C. jejuni from different sources. RESULTS: A total of 1,599 (46.3%) cases were assigned to poultry, 1,070 (31.0%) to ruminant and 67 (1.9%) to wild bird sources; the remaining 715 (20.7%) did not have a source that could be assigned with a probability of greater than 0.95. Compared to ruminant sources, cases attributed to poultry sources were typically among adults (odds ratio (OR) = 1.497, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.211, 1.852), not among males (OR = 0.834, 95% CIs = 0.712, 0.977), in areas with population density of greater than 500 people/km(2 )(OR = 1.213, 95% CIs = 1.030, 1.431), reported in the winter (OR = 1.272, 95% CIs = 1.067, 1.517) and had undertaken recent overseas travel (OR = 1.618, 95% CIs = 1.056, 2.481). The poultry assigned strains had a similar epidemiology to the unassigned strains, with the exception of a significantly higher likelihood of reporting overseas travel in unassigned strains. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than estimate relative risks for acquiring infection, our analyses show that individuals acquire C. jejuni infection from different sources have different associated risk factors. By enhancing our ability to identify at-risk groups and the times at which these groups are likely to be at risk, this work allows public health messages to be targeted more effectively. The rapidly increasing capacity to conduct genetic typing of pathogens makes such traced epidemiological analysis more accessible and has the potential to substantially enhance epidemiological risk factor studies. BioMed Central 2012-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3340322/ /pubmed/22462563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-80 Text en Copyright ©2012 Bessell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bessell, Paul R
Rotariu, Ovidiu
Innocent, Giles T
Smith-Palmer, Alison
Strachan, Norval JC
Forbes, Ken J
Cowden, John M
Reid, Stuart WJ
Matthews, Louise
Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland
title Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland
title_full Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland
title_fullStr Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland
title_full_unstemmed Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland
title_short Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland
title_sort using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in scotland
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3340322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22462563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-80
work_keys_str_mv AT bessellpaulr usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland
AT rotariuovidiu usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland
AT innocentgilest usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland
AT smithpalmeralison usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland
AT strachannorvaljc usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland
AT forbeskenj usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland
AT cowdenjohnm usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland
AT reidstuartwj usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland
AT matthewslouise usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland