Cargando…
Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland
BACKGROUND: Genetic typing data are a potentially powerful resource for determining how infection is acquired. In this paper MLST typing was used to distinguish the routes and risks of infection of humans with Campylobacter jejuni from poultry and ruminant sources METHODS: C. jejuni samples from ani...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3340322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22462563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-80 |
_version_ | 1782231447694737408 |
---|---|
author | Bessell, Paul R Rotariu, Ovidiu Innocent, Giles T Smith-Palmer, Alison Strachan, Norval JC Forbes, Ken J Cowden, John M Reid, Stuart WJ Matthews, Louise |
author_facet | Bessell, Paul R Rotariu, Ovidiu Innocent, Giles T Smith-Palmer, Alison Strachan, Norval JC Forbes, Ken J Cowden, John M Reid, Stuart WJ Matthews, Louise |
author_sort | Bessell, Paul R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genetic typing data are a potentially powerful resource for determining how infection is acquired. In this paper MLST typing was used to distinguish the routes and risks of infection of humans with Campylobacter jejuni from poultry and ruminant sources METHODS: C. jejuni samples from animal and environmental sources and from reported human cases confirmed between June 2005 and September 2006 were typed using MLST. The STRUCTURE software was used to assign the specific sequence types of the sporadic human cases to a particular source. We then used mixed case-case logistic regression analysis to compare the risk factors for being infected with C. jejuni from different sources. RESULTS: A total of 1,599 (46.3%) cases were assigned to poultry, 1,070 (31.0%) to ruminant and 67 (1.9%) to wild bird sources; the remaining 715 (20.7%) did not have a source that could be assigned with a probability of greater than 0.95. Compared to ruminant sources, cases attributed to poultry sources were typically among adults (odds ratio (OR) = 1.497, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.211, 1.852), not among males (OR = 0.834, 95% CIs = 0.712, 0.977), in areas with population density of greater than 500 people/km(2 )(OR = 1.213, 95% CIs = 1.030, 1.431), reported in the winter (OR = 1.272, 95% CIs = 1.067, 1.517) and had undertaken recent overseas travel (OR = 1.618, 95% CIs = 1.056, 2.481). The poultry assigned strains had a similar epidemiology to the unassigned strains, with the exception of a significantly higher likelihood of reporting overseas travel in unassigned strains. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than estimate relative risks for acquiring infection, our analyses show that individuals acquire C. jejuni infection from different sources have different associated risk factors. By enhancing our ability to identify at-risk groups and the times at which these groups are likely to be at risk, this work allows public health messages to be targeted more effectively. The rapidly increasing capacity to conduct genetic typing of pathogens makes such traced epidemiological analysis more accessible and has the potential to substantially enhance epidemiological risk factor studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3340322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33403222012-05-01 Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland Bessell, Paul R Rotariu, Ovidiu Innocent, Giles T Smith-Palmer, Alison Strachan, Norval JC Forbes, Ken J Cowden, John M Reid, Stuart WJ Matthews, Louise BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Genetic typing data are a potentially powerful resource for determining how infection is acquired. In this paper MLST typing was used to distinguish the routes and risks of infection of humans with Campylobacter jejuni from poultry and ruminant sources METHODS: C. jejuni samples from animal and environmental sources and from reported human cases confirmed between June 2005 and September 2006 were typed using MLST. The STRUCTURE software was used to assign the specific sequence types of the sporadic human cases to a particular source. We then used mixed case-case logistic regression analysis to compare the risk factors for being infected with C. jejuni from different sources. RESULTS: A total of 1,599 (46.3%) cases were assigned to poultry, 1,070 (31.0%) to ruminant and 67 (1.9%) to wild bird sources; the remaining 715 (20.7%) did not have a source that could be assigned with a probability of greater than 0.95. Compared to ruminant sources, cases attributed to poultry sources were typically among adults (odds ratio (OR) = 1.497, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.211, 1.852), not among males (OR = 0.834, 95% CIs = 0.712, 0.977), in areas with population density of greater than 500 people/km(2 )(OR = 1.213, 95% CIs = 1.030, 1.431), reported in the winter (OR = 1.272, 95% CIs = 1.067, 1.517) and had undertaken recent overseas travel (OR = 1.618, 95% CIs = 1.056, 2.481). The poultry assigned strains had a similar epidemiology to the unassigned strains, with the exception of a significantly higher likelihood of reporting overseas travel in unassigned strains. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than estimate relative risks for acquiring infection, our analyses show that individuals acquire C. jejuni infection from different sources have different associated risk factors. By enhancing our ability to identify at-risk groups and the times at which these groups are likely to be at risk, this work allows public health messages to be targeted more effectively. The rapidly increasing capacity to conduct genetic typing of pathogens makes such traced epidemiological analysis more accessible and has the potential to substantially enhance epidemiological risk factor studies. BioMed Central 2012-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3340322/ /pubmed/22462563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-80 Text en Copyright ©2012 Bessell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bessell, Paul R Rotariu, Ovidiu Innocent, Giles T Smith-Palmer, Alison Strachan, Norval JC Forbes, Ken J Cowden, John M Reid, Stuart WJ Matthews, Louise Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland |
title | Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland |
title_full | Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland |
title_fullStr | Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland |
title_full_unstemmed | Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland |
title_short | Using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in Scotland |
title_sort | using sequence data to identify alternative routes and risk of infection: a case-study of campylobacter in scotland |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3340322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22462563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-80 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bessellpaulr usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland AT rotariuovidiu usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland AT innocentgilest usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland AT smithpalmeralison usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland AT strachannorvaljc usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland AT forbeskenj usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland AT cowdenjohnm usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland AT reidstuartwj usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland AT matthewslouise usingsequencedatatoidentifyalternativeroutesandriskofinfectionacasestudyofcampylobacterinscotland |